Citation, commencement and interpretation

1. This Scheme may be cited as the War Pensions (Mercantile Marine) (Amendment) Scheme 2001 and, subject to article 3, shall come into force on 9th April 2001.

2. This Scheme shall be read as one with the War Pensions (Mercantile Marine) Scheme 1964( 3 ) (“the principal Scheme”).

Amendments to the principal Scheme

3. —(1) Schedule 7 to the principal Scheme (commencing dates of awards of benefit)( 4 ) shall be amended as provided in this article for the purposes of decisions made and notified on or after 9th April 2001.

(2) In paragraph 1—

(a) omit sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (4)(c);

(b) in sub-paragraph 4(iii) omit “of issue”, for “claim, review” substitute “claim or review” and omit from “or, as appropriate” to the end;

(c) in sub-paragraph (6) before “Where” insert “Subject to sub-paragraph (7)”; and

(d) after sub-paragraph (6) insert—

“ (7) Where an award is reviewed as a result of a decision (“the original decision”) which arose from an official error, the reviewed decision shall take effect from the effective date of the original decision and for this purpose “official error” means an error made by the Secretary of State, or any officer of his carrying out functions in connection with war pensions, defence, or foreign and commonwealth affairs, to which no other person materially contributed, including reliance on erroneous medical advice but excluding any error of law which is only shown to have been an error by virtue of a subsequent decision of a court. ” .

(3) In paragraph 4 omit sub-paragraph (a).

(4) In paragraph 5—

(a) in sub-paragraph (a) for “claim, an application” substitute “claim or an application” and omit “or, as the case may be, an application for an appeal”; and

(b) in the full-out words for “claim, application” substitute “claim or an application” and omit “or application for an appeal”.

(5) In paragraph 9—

(a) for sub-paragraph (a) substitute—

“ (a) he would have made a claim or an application for a review on an earlier date than he actually did but for an act or omission of the Secretary of State or any officer of his carrying out functions in connection with war pensions, defence, or foreign and commonwealth affairs, which wrongly caused him to delay the claim or application and that act or omission was the dominant cause of the delay; ”

(b) in sub-paragraph (b) for “error” substitute “act or omission”; and

(c) in the full-out words for “an appeal” substitute “a review”.