Council Decision
of 19 December 2002
establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC
(2003/33/EC)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste(1), and in particular Article 16 thereof and Annex II thereto,
Whereas:
(1)Pursuant to Article 16 of Directive 1999/31/EC, the Commission is to adopt specific criteria and/or test methods and associated limit values for each class of landfill.
(2)A procedure should be laid down to determine the acceptability of waste at landfills.
(3)Limit values and other criteria should be set for waste acceptable at the different classes of landfills.
(4)The test methods to be used for determining the acceptability of waste at landfills should be determined.
(5)It is appropriate from a technical point of view to exempt from the criteria and procedures set out in the Annex to this Decision those wastes generated by the extractive industry that are deposited on-site.
(6)A suitably short transition period should be granted to Member States to develop the necessary system to apply this Decision and a further brief transition period may be necessary for Member States to ensure the application of the limit values.
(7)The measures provided for in this Decision are not in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 18 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste(2). They therefore have to be adopted by the Council in accordance with Article 18(4) of that Directive,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article A1
1.In this Decision—
(a)“appropriate agency” means—
(i)in relation to England, the Environment Agency;
(ii)in relation to Wales, the Natural Resources Body for Wales;
(iii)in relation to Northern Ireland—
— for the purposes of this Article, the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs;
— otherwise, the Department for Infrastructure;
(b)“appropriate authority” means—
(i)in relation to England, the Secretary of State;
(ii)in relation to Wales, the Welsh Ministers;
(iii)in relation to Northern Ireland—
— for the purposes of this Article, the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs;
— otherwise, the Department for Infrastructure;
(c)“local authority” means—
(i)in England outside Greater London—
— a district council,
— a county council, or
— the Council of the Isles of Scilly;
(ii)in Greater London—
— the council of a London borough,
— the Common Council of the City of London,
— the Sub-Treasurer of the Inner Temple, or
— the Under-Treasurer of the Middle Temple;
(iii)in Wales—
— a county council, or
— a county borough council;
(iv)in Northern Ireland, a district council established under section 1 of the Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1972.
2.In this Decision, “the Landfill Directive” means Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, as last amended by Directive (EU) 2018/850, and read in accordance with paragraphs 3 to 12.
3.A reference to one or more member States in a provision imposing an obligation or conferring a discretion on a member State or member States is to be read as a reference to the appropriate authority, appropriate agency or local authority which, immediately before IP completion day, was responsible for the United Kingdom's compliance with that obligation or able to exercise that discretion in respect of England, Wales or Northern Ireland.
4.Article 1 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 1, the words from “With a view” to “thereof,” were omitted;
(b)in paragraph 2, for “Directive 96/61/EC”, in both places it occurs, there were substituted “ Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions ”.
5.Article 2 is to be read as if—
( a) in point (a)—
(i)“‘waste’,” were omitted; and
(ii)for “Directive 2008/98/EC” there were substituted “the Waste Framework Directive”;
(b)after point (a) there were inserted—
“(aa)“waste” means anything that—
(i)is waste within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the Waste Framework Directive, as read with Articles 5 and 6 of that Directive, and
(ii)is not excluded from the scope of that Directive by Article 2(1), (2) or (3) of that Directive;”;
(c)for point (l) there were substituted—
“(l)“operator”—
(i)in relation to England and Wales, has the meaning given in regulation 7 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016;
(ii)in relation to Northern Ireland, has the meaning given in regulation 2(1) of the Pollution Prevention and Control (Industrial Emissions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013;”.
5A.Article 3 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 2, “Without prejudice to existing Community legislation” were omitted;
(b)for paragraph 3 there were substituted—
“3.The management of extractive waste is excluded from the scope of this Directive—
(a)in relation to England and Wales, where it falls within the scope of Schedule 20, or paragraph 8(a) or (b) of Schedule 22, to the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016(“the 2016 Regulations”);
(b)in relation to Northern Ireland, where it falls within the scope of the Planning (Management of Waste from Extractive Industries) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015 (“the 2015 Regulations”).
In this paragraph, “extractive waste”—
(a)in relation to England and Wales, has the meaning given in regulation 2(1) of the 2016 Regulations;
(b)in relation to Northern Ireland, has the meaning given in regulation 2(2) of the 2015 Regulations.”.
6.Article 5(3) is to be read as if—
(a)in point (b), for “Annex III to Directive 91/689/EEC” there were substituted “ Annex 3 to the Waste Framework Directive ”;
(b)in point (c), for the words from “(property H9” to the end there were substituted “ in Annex 3 to the Waste Framework Directive ”;
(c)in point (d)—
(i)for “two years from the date laid down in Article 18(1)” there were substituted “ 16th July 2001 ”;
(ii)for “five years from the date laid down in Article 18(1)” there were substituted “ from 16th July 2004 ”.
(d)in point (f)—
(i)after “waste”, in the first place it occurs, there were inserted “paper, metal, plastic and glass”;
(ii)the words from “pursuant” to “Article 22 of that Directive” were omitted;
(iii)for “Article 4 of that Directive” there were substituted “Article 4 of the Waste Framework Directive”;
6A.Article 6(a) is to be read as if—
(a)in the first paragraph, in the second sentence, for “may” there were substituted “does”;
(b)in the second paragraph, for the words from “of Directive 2008/98/EC” to the end, there were substituted “set out in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011, or any objectives in assimilated law relating to the increase of preparing for re-use and recycling”.
7.Article 9 is to be read as if, in the words before point (a), the words from “Specifying” to “Directive 96/61/EC,” were omitted.
8.Article 11(1)(b) is to be read as if—
(a)in the first indent—
(i)for “Article 5(3) of Directive 91/689/EEC” there were substituted “ Article 19(2) of the Waste Framework Directive ”;
(ii)for the words from “Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93” to the end there were substituted “ Regulation (EC) 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on shipments of waste ”;
(b)in the third indent, in the second sentence, “and Community” was omitted.
9.Article 13(d) is to be read as if the words from “and without prejudice” to “waste holder” were omitted.
10.Annex 1 is to be read as if—
(a)in point 3.4, for “Directive 80/68/EEC”, there were substituted “ Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy”.
11.Annex 2 is to be read as if—
(a)point 1 were omitted;
(b)in point 2, in the second paragraph, the third sentence were omitted;
(c)in point 4, in the fourth and fifth paragraphs, for “covered by Directive 91/689/EEC” there were substituted “ classified as hazardous waste ”.
12.Annex 3 is to be read as if—
(a) Annex 3 is to be read as if—
(ii)in the table, for “14.00h CET” in both places it occurs there were substituted “1 p.m.”;
(b)in point 3, in the fourth paragraph, in the table, in table footnote (7), the words from “, and will report” to the end were omitted.
Article A2
1.In this Decision, “the Waste Framework Directive” means Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste, as last amended by Directive (EU) 2018/851, and read in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 8.
2.A reference to one or more member States in a provision imposing an obligation or conferring a discretion on a member State or member States is to be read as a reference to the appropriate authority, appropriate agency or local authority which, immediately before IP completion day, was responsible for the United Kingdom's compliance with that obligation or able to exercise that discretion in respect of England, Wales or Northern Ireland.
3.Article 2 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 2—
(i)in the words before point (a), for “other Community legislation” there were substituted “assimilated law”;
(ii)in points (b) and (c), for “Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002” there were substituted “ Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 ”;
(iii)in point (d), as it extends to England and Wales, for the words from “Directive 2006/21/EC” to the end there were substituted “ the Mining Waste Directive ”;
(iv)for point (d), as it extends to Northern Ireland, there were substituted—
“(d)extractive waste, which has the same meaning as in regulation 2(2) of the Planning (Management of Waste from Extractive Industries) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015.”;
(b)in paragraph 3, the words from “Without prejudice” to “Community legislation,” were omitted;
(c)paragraph 4 were omitted.
4. Article 5 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 1, “Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that” were omitted;
(b)after paragraph 1 there were inserted—
“1A.Any decision as to whether a substance or object is a by-product must be made—
(a)in accordance with any regulations setting out detailed criteria on the application of the conditions in paragraph 1 to specific substances or objects; and
(b)having regard to any guidance published by the appropriate authority or the appropriate agency for the purposes of this Article.”;
(c)paragraphs 2 and 3 were omitted..
5.Article 6 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 1, “Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that” were omitted;
(b)after paragraph 1 there were inserted—
“1A.Any decision as to whether a substance or object has ceased to be waste must be made—
(a)in accordance with any regulations or assimilated direct legislation setting out detailed criteria on the application of the conditions in paragraph 1 to specific types of waste; and
(b)having regard to any guidance published by the appropriate authority or the appropriate agency for the purposes of this Article.”;
(c)in paragraph 2—
(i)the first subparagraph were omitted;
(ii)in the second subparagraph, for “Those detailed criteria” there were substituted “Any detailed criteria set out in guidance as referred to in paragraph 1A”;
(iii)the third and fourth subparagraphs were omitted;
(d)paragraph 3 were omitted;
(e)in paragraph 4—
(i)in the first subparagraph—
(aa)in the first sentence, for the words from the beginning to “Member State”, there were substituted “Where criteria have not been set out as referred to in paragraph 1A(a), the appropriate agency”;
(bb)the second sentence were omitted;
(ii)in the second subparagraph—
(aa)for “Member States” there were substituted “The appropriate agency”;
(bb)“by competent authorities” were omitted.
6.Article 7 is to be read as if—
(a)before paragraph 1 there were inserted—
“A1.In this Article, the “list of waste” means the list contained in the Annex to Commission Decision 2000/532/EC, as that list has effect in England, Wales or Northern Ireland (as the case may be).”;
(b)in paragraph 1—
(i)the first and second sentences were omitted;
(ii)for the third sentence there were substituted “The list of waste shall, except as provided in Commission Decision 2000/532/EC, be binding as regards determination of the waste which is to be considered as hazardous waste or as non-hazardous waste.”;
(c)paragraphs 2, 3, 6 and 7 were omitted.
7.Article 19(2) is to be read as if, for “a Member State” there was substituted “ the United Kingdom ”.
8.Annex 3 is to be read as if, in entry HP 9, in the second sentence, “in the Member States” were omitted.
Article A3
1.In Article A2(3)(a)(iii), the “Mining Waste Directive” means Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from extractive industries, read in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3.
2.Article 2 is to be read as if—
(a)in paragraph 2(c), the reference to Article 11(3)(j) of Directive 2000/60/EC were a reference to that Article read in accordance with paragraph 7 of this Article;
(b)paragraphs 3 and 4 were omitted.
3.Article 3(1) is to be read as if, for “Article 1(a) of Directive 75/442/EEC” there were substituted “ Article 3(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC, as read with Articles 5 and 6 of that Directive ”.
4.For the purposes of paragraph 2(a), Article 11(3)(j) of Directive 2000/60/EC is to be read as if—
(a)the reference to “Member States” were a reference to the competent authority or appropriate agency;
(b)in the words after the final indent, “environmental objectives”—
(i)in relation to the Northumbria River Basin District, means the environmental objectives referred to in the WFD Regulations as applied by regulation 5 of the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (Northumbria River Basin District) Regulations 2003;
(ii)in relation to the Solway Tweed River Basin District, has the same meaning as in regulation 2 of the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (Solway Tweed River Basin District) Regulations 2004;
(iii)in relation to a river basin district within the meaning of the WFD Regulations, has the same meaning as in those Regulations.
5.In paragraph 4(b), “the WFD Regulations” means the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Regulations 2017.
Article 1
1.This Decision establishes the criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills in accordance with the principles set out in Directive 1999/31/EC and in particular Annex II thereto.
2.This Decision does not extend to Scotland.
Article 2
The appropriate agency shall apply the procedure as set out in section 1 of the Annex to this Decision to determine the acceptability of waste at landfills.
Article 3
The appropriate agency shall ensure that waste is accepted at a landfill only if it fulfils the acceptance criteria of the relevant landfill class as set out in section 2 of the Annex to this Decision.
Article 4
The sampling and testing methods listed in section 3 of the Annex to this Decision shall be used for determining the acceptability of waste at landfills.
Article 5
... The criteria and procedures as set out in the Annex to this Decision shall not apply to waste resulting from prospecting, extraction, treatment and storage of mineral resources nor from the working of quarries, when they are deposited on-site. ...
Article 6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 7
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Done at Brussels, 19 December 2002.
For the Council
The President
M. Fischer Boel
ANNEXCRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF WASTE AT LANDFILLS
Introduction
This Annex lays down the uniform waste classification and acceptance procedure according to Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste (the "Landfill Directive").
...
Section 1 of this Annex lays down the procedure to determine the acceptability of waste at landfills. This procedure consists of the basic characterisation, compliance testing and on-site verification as defined in section 3 of Annex II to the Landfill Directive.
Section 2 of this Annex lays down the acceptance criteria for each landfill class. Waste may be accepted at a landfill only if it fulfils the acceptance criteria of the relevant landfill class as laid down in section 2 of this Annex.
Section 3 of this Annex lists the methods to be used for the sampling and testing of waste.
Appendix A defines the safety assessment to be carried out for underground storage.
...
1.PROCEDURE FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF WASTE AT LANDFILLS
1.1.Basic characterisation
Basic characterisation is the first step in the acceptance procedure and constitutes a full characterisation of the waste by gathering all the necessary information for a safe disposal of the waste in the long term. Basic characterisation is required for each type of waste.
1.1.1.Functions of basic characterisation
Basic information on the waste (type and origin, composition, consistency, leachability and - where necessary and available - other characteristic properties)
Basic information for understanding the behaviour of waste in landfills and options for treatment as laid out in Article 6(a) of the Landfill Directive
Assessing waste against limit values
Detection of key variables (critical parameters) for compliance testing and options for simplification of compliance testing (leading to a significant decrease of constituents to be measured, but only after demonstration of relevant information). Characterisation may deliver ratios between basic characterisation and results of simplified test procedures as well as frequency for compliance testing.
If the basic characterisation of waste shows that the waste fulfils the criteria for a landfill class as laid down in section 2 of this Annex, the waste is deemed to be acceptable at this landfill class. If this is not the case, the waste is not acceptable at this landfill class.
The producer of the waste or, in default, the person responsible for its management, is responsible for ensuring that the characterisation information is correct.
The operator shall keep records of the required information for a period to be defined by the appropriate authority .
1.1.2.Fundamental requirements for basic characterisation of the waste
Source and origin of the waste
Information on the process producing the waste (description and characteristics of raw materials and products)
Description of the waste treatment applied in compliance with Article 6(a) of the Landfill Directive, or a statement of reasons why such treatment is not considered necessary
Data on the composition of the waste and the leaching behaviour, where relevant
Appearance of the waste (smell, colour, physical form)
Code according to Commission Decision 2000/532/EC
For hazardous waste in case of mirror entries: the relevant hazard properties according to Annex 3 to the Waste Framework Directive
Information to prove that the waste does not fall under the exclusions of Article 5(3) of the Landfill Directive
The landfill class at which the waste may be accepted
If necessary, additional precautions to be taken at the landfill
Check if the waste can be recycled or recovered.
1.1.3.Testing
As a general rule waste must be tested to obtain the above information. In addition to the leaching behaviour, the composition of the waste must be known or determined by testing. The tests used for basic characterisation must always include those to be used for compliance testing.
The content of the characterisation, the extent of laboratory testing required and the relationship between basic characterisation and compliance checking depends on the type of waste. A differentiation can be made between:
wastes that are regularly generated in the same process;
wastes that are not regularly generated.
The characterisations outlined in points (a) and (b) will provide information that can be directly compared with acceptance criteria for the relevant class of landfill and, in addition, descriptive information can be supplied (e.g. the consequences of depositing with municipal waste).
Wastes regularly generated in the same process
These are individual and consistent wastes regularly generated in the same process, where:
the installation and the process generating the waste are well known and the input materials to the process and the process itself are well defined,
the operator of the installation provides all necessary information and informs the operator of the landfill of changes to the process (especially changes to the input material).
The process will often be at a single installation. The waste can also be from different installations, if it can be identified as single stream with common characteristics within known boundaries (e.g. bottom ash from the incineration of municipal waste).
For these wastes the basic characterisation will comprise the fundamental requirements listed in section 1.1.2 and especially the following:
compositional range for the individual wastes,
range and variability of characteristic properties,
if required, the leachability of the wastes determined by a batch leaching test and/or a percolation test and/or a pH dependence test,
key variables to be tested on a regular basis.
If the waste is produced in the same process in different installations, information must be given on the scope of the evaluation. Consequently, a sufficient number of measurements must be taken to show the range and variability of the characteristic properties of the waste. The waste can then be considered characterised and shall subsequently be subject to compliance testing only, unless significant change in the generation processes occur.
For wastes from the same process in the same installation, the results of the measurements may show only minor variations of the properties of the waste in comparison with the appropriate limit values. The waste can then be considered characterised, and shall subsequently be subject to compliance testing only, unless significant changes in the generation process occur.
Waste from facilities for the bulking or mixing of waste, from waste transfer stations or mixed waste streams from waste collectors, can vary considerably in their properties. This must be taken into consideration in the basic characterisation. Such wastes may fall under case (b).
Wastes that are not regularly generated
These wastes are not regularly generated in the same process in the same installation and are not part of a well-characterised waste stream. Each batch produced of such waste will need to be characterised. The basic characterisation shall include the fundamental requirements for basic characterisation. As each batch produced has to be characterised, no compliance testing is needed.
1.1.4.Cases where testing is not required
Testing for basic characterisation can be dispensed with in the following cases:
the waste is on a list of wastes not requiring testing as laid down in section 2 of this Annex;
all the necessary information, for the basic characterisation, is known and duly justified to the full satisfaction of the competent authority;
certain waste types where testing is impractical or where appropriate testing procedures and acceptance criteria are unavailable. This must be justified and documented, including the reasons why the waste is deemed acceptable at this landfill class.
1.2.Compliance testing
When waste has been deemed acceptable for a landfill class on the basis of a basic characterisation pursuant to section 1, it shall subsequently be subject to compliance testing to determine if it complies with the results of the basic characterisation and the relevant acceptance criteria as laid down in section 2.
The function of compliance testing is periodically to check regularly arising waste streams.
The relevant parameters to be tested are determined in the basic characterisation. Parameters should be related to basic characterisation information; only a check on critical parameters (key variables), as determined in the basic characterisation, is necessary. The check has to show that the waste meets the limit values for the critical parameters.
The tests used for compliance testing shall be one or more of those used in the basic characterisation. The testing shall consist at least of a batch leaching test. For this purpose the methods listed under section 3 shall be used.
Wastes that are exempted from the testing requirements for basic characterisation in section 1.1.4(a) and section 1.1.4(c) are also exempted from compliance testing. They will, however, need checking for compliance with basic characterisation information other than testing.
Compliance testing shall be carried out at least once a year and the operator must, in any event, ensure that compliance testing is carried out in the scope and frequency determined by basic characterisation.
Records of the test results shall be kept for a period that will be determined by the appropriate authority .
1.3.On-site verification
Each load of waste delivered to a landfill shall be visually inspected before and after unloading. The required documentation shall be checked.
For waste deposited by the waste producer at a landfill in his control, this verification may be made at the point of dispatch.
The waste may be accepted at the landfill, if it is the same as that which has been subjected to basic characterisation and compliance testing and which is described in the accompanying documents. If this is not the case, the waste must not be accepted.
The appropriate authority shall determine the testing requirements for on-site verification, including where appropriate rapid test methods.
Upon delivery, samples shall be taken periodically. The samples taken shall be kept after acceptance of the waste for a period that will be determined by the appropriate authority (not less than one month; see Article 11(1)(b) of the Landfill Directive.
2.WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
This section sets out the criteria for the acceptance of waste at each landfill class, including criteria for underground storage.
In certain circumstances, up to three times higher limit values for specific parameters listed in this section (other than dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in sections 2.1.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3.1 and 2.4.1, BTEX, PCBs and mineral oil in section 2.1.2.2, total organic carbon (TOC) and pH in section 2.3.2 and loss on ignition (LOI) and/or TOC in section 2.4.2, and restricting the possible increase of the limit value for TOC in section 2.1.2.2 to only two times the limit value) are acceptable, if
the competent authority gives a permit for specified wastes on a case-by-case basis for the recipient landfill, taking into account the characteristics of the landfill and its surroundings, and
emissions (including leachate) from the landfill, taking into account the limits for those specific parameters in this section, will present no additional risk to the environment according to a risk assessment.
The Secretary of State must publish information on the annual number of permits issued in relation to England under this provision. The Welsh Ministers must publish information on the annual number of permits issued in relation to Wales under this provision. The first information under the first and second sentences must be published before 1st April 2022. Subsequent information must be published at intervals not exceeding 3 years.
The appropriate authority shall define criteria for compliance with the limit values set out in this section.
2.1.Criteria for landfills for inert waste
2.1.1.List of wastes acceptable at landfills for inert waste without testing
Wastes on the following short list are assumed to fulfil the criteria as set out in the definition of inert waste in Article 2(e) of the Landfill Directive and the criteria listed in section 2.1.2. The wastes can be admitted without testing at a landfill for inert waste.
The waste must be a single stream (only one source) of a single waste type. Different wastes contained in the list may be accepted together, provided they are from the same source.
In case of suspicion of contamination (either from visual inspection or from knowledge of the origin of the waste) testing should be applied or the waste refused. If the listed wastes are contaminated or contain other material or substances such as metals, asbestos, plastics, chemicals, etc. to an extent which increases the risk associated with the waste sufficiently to justify their disposal in other classes of landfills, they may not be accepted in a landfill for inert waste.
If there is a doubt that the waste fulfils the definition of inert waste according to Article 2(e) of the Landfill Directive and the criteria listed in section 2.1.2 or about the lack of contamination of the waste, testing must be applied. For this purpose the methods listed under section 3 shall be used.
| EWC code | Description | Restrictions |
|---|---|---|
* Selected construction and demolition waste (C & D waste): with low contents of other types of materials (like metals, plastic, soil, organics, wood, rubber, etc). The origin of the waste must be known.
| ||
| 1011 03 | Waste glass-based fibrous materials | Only without organic binders |
| 1501 07 | Glass packagingGlas | |
| 1701 01 | Concrete | Selected C & D waste only * |
| 1701 02 | Bricks | Selected C & D waste only * |
| 1701 03 | Tiles and ceramics | Selected C & D waste only * |
| 1701 07 | Mixtures of concrete,bricks, tiles and ceramics | Selected C & D waste only * |
| 1702 02 | Glass | |
| 1705 04 | Soil and stones | Excluding topsoil, peat; excluding soil and stones from contaminated sites |
| 1912 05 | Glass | |
| 2001 02 | Glass | Separately collected glass only |
| 2002 02 | Soil and stones | Only from garden and parks waste; Excluding top soil, peat |
Waste not appearing on this list must be subject to testing as laid down under section 1 to determine if it fulfils the criteria for waste acceptable at landfills for inert waste as set out in section 2.1.2.
2.1.2.Limit values for waste acceptable at landfills for inert waste
2.1.2.1.Leaching limit values
The following leaching limit values apply for waste acceptable at landfills for inert waste, calculated at liquid to solid ratios (L/S) of 2 l/kg and 10 l/kg for total release and directly expressed in mg/l for C0 (the first eluate of percolation test at L/S = 0,1 l/kg). The appropriate authority shall determine which of the test methods (see section 3) and corresponding limit values in the table should be used.
| Component | L/S = 2 l/kg | L/S = 10 l/kg | C0 (percolation test) |
|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg dry substance | mg/kg dry substance | mg/l | |
* ** *** | |||
| As | 0,1 | 0,5 | 0,06 |
| Ba | 7 | 20 | 4 |
| Cd | 0,03 | 0,04 | 0,02 |
| Cr total | 0,2 | 0,5 | 0,1 |
| Cu | 0,9 | 2 | 0,6 |
| Hg | 0,003 | 0,01 | 0,002 |
| Mo | 0,3 | 0,5 | 0,2 |
| Ni | 0,2 | 0,4 | 0,12 |
| Pb | 0,2 | 0,5 | 0,15 |
| Sb | 0,02 | 0,06 | 0,1 |
| Se | 0,06 | 0,1 | 0,04 |
| Zn | 2 | 4 | 1,2 |
| Chloride | 550 | 800 | 460 |
| Fluoride | 4 | 10 | 2,5 |
| Sulphate | 560 * | 1 000 * | 1 500 |
| Phenol index | 0,5 | 1 | 0,3 |
| DOC ** | 240 | 500 | 160 |
| TDS *** | 2 500 | 4 000 | — |
2.1.2.2.Limit values for total content of organic parameters
In addition to the leaching limit values under section 2.1.2.1, inert wastes must meet the following additional limit values:
| Parameter | Value mg/kg |
|---|---|
* In the case of soils, a higher limit value may be admitted by the competent authority, provided the DOC value of 500mg/kg is achieved at L/S = 10 l/kg, either at the soil's own pH or at a pH value between 7,5 and 8,0. | |
| TOC (total organic carbon) | 30 000 * |
| BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes) | 6 |
| PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls, 7 congeners) | 1 |
| Mineral oil (C10 to C40) | 500 |
| PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) | The appropriate authority to set limit value |
2.2.Criteria for landfills for non-hazardous waste
The appropriate authority may create subcategories of landfills for non-hazardous waste.
In this Annex limit values are laid down only for non-hazardous waste, which is landfilled in the same cell with stable, non-reactive hazardous waste.
2.2.1.Wastes acceptable at landfills for non-hazardous waste without testing
Municipal waste as defined in Article 3(2b) of the Waste Framework Directive that is classified as non-hazardous in Chapter 20 of the Commission Decision 2000/532/EC, separately collected non-hazardous fractions of household wastes and the same non-hazardous materials from other origins can be admitted without testing at landfills for non-hazardous waste.
The wastes may not be admitted if they have not been subjected to prior treatment according to Article 6(a) of the Landfill Directive, or if they are contaminated to an extent which increases the risk associated with the waste sufficiently to justify their disposal in other facilities.
They may not be accepted in cells, where stable, non-reactive hazardous waste is accepted pursuant to Article 6(c)(iii) of the Landfill Directive.
2.2.2.Limit values for non-hazardous waste
The following limit values apply to granular non-hazardous waste accepted in the same cell as stable, non-reactive hazardous waste, calculated at L/S = 2 and 10 l/kg for total release and directly expressed in mg/l for C0 (in the first eluate of percolation test at L/S = 0,1 l/kg). Granular wastes include all wastes that are not monolithic. The appropriate authority shall determine which of the test methods (see section 3) and corresponding limit values in the table should be used.
| Components | L/S = 2 l/kg | L/S = 10 l/kg | C0 (percolation test) |
|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg dry substance | mg/kg dry substance | mg/l | |
* ** | |||
| As | 0,4 | 2 | 0,3 |
| Ba | 30 | 100 | 20 |
| Cd | 0,6 | 1 | 0,3 |
| Cr total | 4 | 10 | 2,5 |
| Cu | 25 | 50 | 30 |
| Hg | 0,05 | 0,2 | 0,03 |
| Mo | 5 | 10 | 3,5 |
| Ni | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| Pb | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| Sb | 0,2 | 0,7 | 0,15 |
| Se | 0,3 | 0,5 | 0,2 |
| Zn | 25 | 50 | 15 |
| Chloride | 10 000 | 15 000 | 8 500 |
| Fluoride | 60 | 150 | 40 |
| Sulphate | 10 000 | 20 000 | 7 000 |
| DOC * | 380 | 800 | 250 |
| TDS ** | 40 000 | 60 000 | — |
The appropriate authority shall set criteria for monolithic waste to provide the same level of environmental protection given by the above limit values.
2.2.3.Gypsum waste
Non-hazardous gypsum-based materials should be disposed of only in landfills for non-hazardous waste in cells where no biodegradable waste is accepted. The limit values for TOC and DOC given in sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.1 shall apply to wastes landfilled together with gypsum-based materials.
2.3.Criteria for hazardous waste acceptable at landfills for non-hazardous waste pursuant to Article 6(c)(iii)
Stable, non-reactive means that the leaching behaviour of the waste will not change adversely in the long-term, under landfill design conditions or foreseeable accidents:
in the waste alone (for example, by biodegradation),
under the impact of long-term ambient conditions (for example, water, air, temperature, mechanical constraints),
by the impact of other wastes (including waste products such as leachate and gas).
2.3.1.Leaching limit values
The following leaching limit values apply to granular hazardous waste acceptable at landfills for non-hazardous waste, calculated at L/S = 2 and 10 l/kg for total release and directly expressed in mg/l for C0 ( the first eluate of percolation test at L/S = 0,1 l/kg). Granular wastes include all wastes that are not monolithic. The appropriate authority shall determine which of the test methods and corresponding limit values should be used.
| Components | L/S = 2 l/kg | L/S = 10 l/kg | C0 (percolation test) |
|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg dry substance | mg/kg dry substance | mg/l | |
* ** | |||
| As | 0,4 | 2 | 0,3 |
| Ba | 30 | 100 | 20 |
| Cd | 0,6 | 1 | 0,3 |
| Cr total | 4 | 10 | 2,5 |
| Cu | 25 | 50 | 30 |
| Hg | 0,05 | 0,2 | 0,03 |
| Mo | 5 | 10 | 3,5 |
| Ni | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| Pb | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| Sb | 0,2 | 0,7 | 0,15 |
| Se | 0,3 | 0,5 | 0,2 |
| Zn | 25 | 50 | 15 |
| Chloride | 10 000 | 15 000 | 8 500 |
| Fluoride | 60 | 150 | 40 |
| Sulphate | 10 000 | 20 000 | 7 000 |
| DOC * | 380 | 800 | 250 |
| TDS ** | 40 000 | 60 000 | — |
The appropriate authority shall set criteria for monolithic waste to provide the same level of environmental protection given by the above limit values.
2.3.2.Other criteria
In addition to the leaching limit values under section 2.3.1, granular wastes must meet the following additional criteria:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
* | |
| TOC (total organic carbon) | 5 % * |
| pH | Minimum 6 |
| ANC (acid neutralisation capacity) | Must be evaluated |
The appropriate authority must set criteria to ensure that the waste will have sufficient physical stability and bearing capacity.
The appropriate authority shall set criteria to ensure that hazardous monolithic wastes are stable and non-reactive before acceptance in landfills for non-hazardous waste.
2.3.3.Asbestos waste
Construction materials containing asbestos and other suitable asbestos waste may be landfilled at landfills for non-hazardous waste in accordance with Article 6(c)(iii) of the Landfill Directive without testing.
For landfills receiving construction materials containing asbestos and other suitable asbestos waste the following requirements must be fulfilled:
the waste contains no other hazardous substances than bound asbestos, including fibres bound by a binding agent or packed in plastic,
the landfill accepts only construction material containing asbestos and other suitable asbestos waste. These wastes may also be landfilled in a separate cell of a landfill for non-hazardous waste, if the cell is sufficiently self-contained,
in order to avoid dispersion of fibres, the zone of deposit is covered daily and before each compacting operation with appropriate material and, if the waste is not packed, it is regularly sprinkled,
a final top cover is put on the landfill/cell in order to avoid the dispersion of fibres,
no works are carried out on the landfill/cell that could lead to a release of fibres (e.g. drilling of holes),
after closure a plan is kept of the location of the landfill/cell indicating that asbestos wastes have been deposited,
appropriate measures are taken to limit the possible uses of the land after closure of the landfill in order to avoid human contact with the waste.
For landfills receiving only construction material containing asbestos, the requirements set out in Annex I, point 3.2 and 3.3 of the Landfill Directive can be reduced, if the above requirements are fulfilled.
2.4.Criteria for waste acceptable at landfills for hazardous waste
2.4.1.Leaching limit values
The following leaching limit values apply for granular waste acceptable at landfills for hazardous waste, calculated at L/S = 2 and 10 l/kg for total release and directly expressed in mg/l for C0 (in the first eluate of percolation test at L/S = 0,1 l/kg). Granular wastes include all wastes that are not monolithic. The appropriate authority shall determine which of the test methods and corresponding limit values in the table should be used.
| Components | L/S = 2 l/kg | L/S = 10 l/kg | C0 (percolation test) |
|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg dry substance | mg/kg dry substance | mg/l | |
* If the waste does not meet these values for DOC at its own pH, it may alternatively be tested at L/S = 10 l/kg and a pH of 7,5-8,0. The waste may be considered as complying with the acceptance criteria for DOC, if the result of this determination does not exceed 1 000 mg/kg. (A draft method based on prEN 14429 is available.) ** The values for TDS can be used alternatively to the values for sulphate and chloride. | |||
| As | 6 | 25 | 3 |
| Ba | 100 | 300 | 60 |
| Cd | 3 | 5 | 1,7 |
| Cr total | 25 | 70 | 15 |
| Cu | 50 | 100 | 60 |
| Hg | 0,5 | 2 | 0,3 |
| Mo | 20 | 30 | 10 |
| Ni | 20 | 40 | 12 |
| Pb | 25 | 50 | 15 |
| Sb | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Se | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Zn | 90 | 200 | 60 |
| Chloride | 17 000 | 25 000 | 15 000 |
| Fluoride | 200 | 500 | 120 |
| Sulphate | 25 000 | 50 000 | 17 000 |
| DOC * | 480 | 1 000 | 320 |
| TDS ** | 70 000 | 100 000 | — |
The appropriate authority shall set criteria for monolithic waste to provide the same level of environmental protection given by the above limit values.
2.4.2.Other criteria
In addition to the leaching limit values under section 2.4.1, hazardous wastes must meet the following additional criteria:
| Parameter | Value mg/kg |
|---|---|
* Either LOI or TOC must be used. ** If this value is not achieved, a higher limit value may be admitted by the competent authority, provided that the DOC value of 1 000 mg/kg is achieved at L/S = 10 l/kg, either at the material's own pH or at a pH value between 7,5 and 8,0. | |
| LOI * | 10 % |
| TOC * | 6 % ** |
| ANC (acid neutralisation capacity) | Must be evaluated |
2.5.Criteria for underground storage
For the acceptance of waste in underground storage sites, a site-specific safety assessment as defined in Annex A must be carried out. Waste may be accepted only if it is compatible with the site-specific safety assessment.
At underground storage sites for inert waste, only waste that fulfils the criteria set out in section 2.1 may be accepted.
At underground storage sites for non-hazardous waste, only waste that fulfils the criteria set out in section 2.2 or in section 2.3 may be accepted.
At underground storage sites for hazardous waste, waste may be accepted only if it is compatible with the site-specific safety assessment. In this case, the criteria set out in section 2.4 do not apply. However, the waste must be subject to the acceptance procedure as set out in section 1.
3.SAMPLING AND TEST METHODS
Sampling and testing for basic characterisation and compliance testing shall be carried out by independent and qualified persons and institutions. Laboratories shall have proven experience in waste testing and analysis and an efficient quality assurance system.
The appropriate authority may decide that:
the sampling may be carried out by producers of waste or operators under the condition that sufficient supervision of independent and qualified persons or institutions ensures that the objectives set out in this Decision are achieved;
the testing of the waste may be carried out by producers of waste or operators if they have set up an appropriate quality assurance system including periodic independent checking.
As long as a CEN standard is not available as formal EN, the appropriate authority will use either national standards or procedures or the draft CEN standard, when it has reached the prEN stage.
The following methods shall be used.
Sampling
For the sampling of waste - for basic characterisation, compliance testing and on-site verification testing - a sampling plan shall be developed according to part 1 of the sampling standard currently developed by CEN.
General waste properties
| EN 13137 | Determination of TOC in waste, sludge and sediments |
| prEN 14346 | Calculation of dry matter by determination of dry residue or water content |
Leaching tests
| prEN 14405 | Leaching behaviour test - Up-flow percolation test (Up-flow percolation test for inorganic constituents) |
| EN 12457/1-4 | Leaching — Compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges: |
| part 1: L/S = 2 l/kg, particle size < 4 mm | |
| part 2: L/S = 10 l/kg, particle size < 4 mm | |
| part 3: L/S = 2 and 8 l/kg, particle size < 4 mm | |
| part 4: L/S = 10 l/kg, particle size < 10 mm |
Digestion of raw waste
| EN 13657 | Digestion for subsequent determination of aqua regia soluble portion of elements (partial digestion of the solid waste prior to elementary analysis, leaving the silicate matrix intact) |
| EN 13656 | Microwave-assisted digestion with hydrofluoric (HF), nitric (HNO3) and hydrochloric (HCl) acid mixture for subsequent determination of elements (total digestion of the solid waste prior to elementary analysis) |
Analysis
| ENV 12506 | Analysis of eluates — Determination of pH, As, Ba, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, CrVI, Cu, Mo, Ni, NO2, Pb, total S, SO4, V and Zn (analysis of inorganic constituents of solid waste and/or its eluate; major, minor and trace elements) |
| ENV 13370 | Analysis of eluates — Determination of ammonium, AOX, conductivity, Hg, phenol index, TOC, easily liberatable CN, F (analysis of inorganic constituents of solid waste and/or its eluate (anions)) |
| prEN 14039 | Determination of hydrocarbon content in the range of C10 to C40 by gas chromatography |
This list will be amended when more CEN standards are available.
For tests and analyses, for which CEN methods are not (yet) available, the methods used must be approved by the competent authorities.
Appendix ASAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE OF WASTE IN UNDERGROUND STORAGE
1.SAFETY PHILOSOPHY FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE: ALL TYPES
1.1.The importance of the geological barrier
Isolation of wastes from the biosphere is the ultimate objective for the final disposal of wastes in underground storage. The wastes, the geological barrier and the cavities, including any engineered structures constitute a system that together with all other technical aspects must fulfil the corresponding requirements.
...
1.2.Site-specific risk assessment
The assessment of risk requires the identification of:
the hazard (in this case the deposited wastes),
the receptors (in this case the biosphere and possibly groundwater),
the pathways by which substances from the wastes may reach the biosphere, and
the assessment of impact of substances that may reach the biosphere.
Acceptance criteria for underground storage are to be derived from, inter alia, the analysis of the host rock, so it must be confirmed that no site-related conditions specified in Annex I to the Landfill Directive (with an exemption of Annex I(2), (3), (4) and (5)) are of relevance.
The acceptance criteria for underground storage can be obtained only by referring to the local conditions. This requires a demonstration of the suitability of the strata for establishing a storage, i.e. an assessment of the risks to containment, taking into account the overall system of the waste, engineered structures and cavities and the host rock body.
The site specific risk assessment of the installation must be carried out for both the operational and post-operational phases. From these assessments, the required control and safety measures can be derived and the acceptance criteria can be developed.
An integrated performance assessment analysis shall be prepared, including the following components:
geological assessment;
geomechanical assessment;
hydrogeological assessment;
geochemical assessment;
biosphere impact assessment;
assessment of the operational phase;
long-term assessment;
assessment of the impact of all the surface facilities at the site.
1.2.1.Geological assessment
A thorough investigation or knowledge of the geological setting of a site is required. This includes investigations and analyses of kind of rocks, soils and the topography. The geological assessment should demonstrate the suitability of the site for underground storage. The location, frequency and structure of any faulting or fracturing in surrounding geological strata and the potential impact of seismic activity on these structures should be included. Alternative site locations should be considered.
1.2.2.Geomechanical assessment
The stability of the cavities must be demonstrated by appropriate investigations and predictions. The deposited waste must be part of this assessment. The processes should be analysed and documented in a systematic way.
The following should be demonstrated:
that during and after the formation of the cavities, no major deformation is to be expected either in the cavity itself or at the earth surface which could impair the operability of the underground storage or provide a pathway to the biosphere;
that the load-bearing capacity of the cavity is sufficient to prevent its collapse during operation;
that the deposited material must have the necessary stability compatible with the geo-mechanical properties of the host rock.
1.2.3.Hydrogeological assessment
A thorough investigation of the hydraulic properties is required to assess the groundwater flow pattern in the surrounding strata based on information on the hydraulic conductivity of the rock mass, fractures and the hydraulic gradients.
1.2.4.Geochemical assessment
A thorough investigation of the rock and the groundwater composition is required to assess the present groundwater composition and its potential evolution over time, the nature and abundance of fracture filling minerals, as well as a quantitative mineralogical description of the host rock. The impact of variability on the geochemical system should be assessed.
1.2.5.Biosphere impact assessment
An investigation of the biosphere that could be impacted by the underground storage is required. Baseline studies should be performed to define local natural background levels of relevant substances.
1.2.6.Assessment of the operational phase
For the operational phase, the analysis should demonstrate the following:
the stability of the cavities as in section 1.2.2;
no unacceptable risk of a pathway developing between the wastes and the biosphere;
no unacceptable risks affecting the operation of the facility.
When demonstrating operational safety, a systematic analysis of the operation of the facility must be made on the basis of specific data on the waste inventory, facility management and the scheme of operation. It is to be shown that the waste will not react with the rock in any chemical or physical way, which could impair the strength and tightness of the rock and endanger the storage itself. For these reasons, in addition to wastes that are banned by Article 5(3) of the Landfill Directive, wastes that are liable to spontaneous combustion under the storage conditions (temperature, humidity), gaseous products, volatile wastes, wastes coming from collections in the form of unidentified mixtures should not be accepted.
Particular incidents that might lead to the development of a pathway between the wastes and the biosphere in the operational phase should be identified. The different types of potential operational risks should be summarised in specific categories. Their possible effects should be evaluated. It should be shown that there is no unacceptable risk that the containment of the operation will be breached. Contingency measures should be provided.
1.2.7.Long-term assessment
In order to comply with the objectives of sustainable landfilling, risk assessment should cover the long-term. It must be ascertained that no pathways to the biosphere will be generated during the long-term post-operation of the underground storage.
The barriers of the underground storage site (e.g. the waste quality, engineered structures, back filling and sealing of shafts and drillings), the performance of the host rock, the surrounding strata and the overburden should be quantitatively assessed over the long-term and evaluated on the basis of site-specific data or sufficiently conservative assumptions. The geochemical and geohydrological conditions such as groundwater flow (see sections 1.2.3 and 1.2.4), barrier efficiency, natural attenuation as well as leaching of the deposited wastes should be taken into consideration.
The long-term safety of an underground storage should be demonstrated by a safety assessment comprising a description of the initial status at a specified time (e.g. time of closure) followed by a scenario outlining important changes that are expected over geological time. Finally, the consequences of the release of relevant substances from the underground storage should be assessed for different scenarios reflecting the possible long-term evolution of the biosphere, geosphere and the underground storage.
Containers and cavity lining should not be taken into account when assessing the long-term risks of waste deposits because of their limited lifetime.
1.2.8.Impact assessment of the surface reception facilities
Although the wastes taken at the site may be destined for subsurface disposal, wastes will be unloaded, tested and possibly stored on the surface, before reaching their final destination. The reception facilities must be designed and operated in a manner that will prevent harm to human health and the local environment. They must fulfil the same requirements as any other waste reception facility.
1.2.9.Assessment of other risks
For reasons of protection of workers, wastes should be deposited only in an underground storage securely separated from mining activities. Waste should not be accepted if it contains, or could generate, hazardous substances which might harm human health, e.g. pathogenic germs of communicable diseases.
2.ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE: ALL TYPES
2.1.Excluded wastes
In the light of sections 1.2.1 to 1.2.8, wastes that may undergo undesired physical, chemical or biological transformation after they have been deposited must not be disposed of in underground storage. This includes the following:
wastes listed in Article 5(3) of the Landfill Directive;
wastes and their containers which might react with water or with the host rock under the storage conditions and lead to:
a change in the volume,
generation of auto-flammable or toxic or explosive substances or gases, or
any other reactions which could endanger the operational safety and/or the integrity of the barrier.
Wastes which might react with each other must be defined and classified in groups of compatibility; the different groups of compatibility must be physically separated in the storage;
wastes that are biodegradable;
wastes that have a pungent smell;
wastes that can generate a gas-air mixture which is toxic or explosive. This particularly refers to wastes that:
cause toxic gas concentrations due to the partial pressures of their components,
form concentrations when saturated within a container, which are higher than 10 % of the concentration which corresponds to the lower explosive limit;
wastes with insufficient stability to correspond to the geomechanical conditions;
wastes that are auto-flammable or liable to spontaneous combustion under the storage conditions, gaseous products, volatile wastes, wastes coming from collections in the form of unidentified mixtures;
wastes that contain, or could generate, pathogenic germs of communicable diseases (already provided for by Article 5(3)(c) of the Landfill Directive).
2.2.Lists of waste suitable for underground storage
Inert wastes, hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, not excluded by sections 2.1 and 2.2 may be suitable for underground storage.
The appropriate agency may produce lists of wastes acceptable at underground storage facilities in accordance with the classes given in Article 4 of the Landfill Directive.
2.3.Site-specific risk assessment
Acceptance of waste at a specific site must be subject to site-specific risk assessment.
The site-specific assessments outlined in section 1.2 for the wastes to be accepted at an underground storage should demonstrate that the level of isolation from the biosphere is acceptable. The criteria have to be fulfilled under storage conditions.
2.4.Acceptance conditions
Wastes can be deposited only in an underground storage securely separated from mining activities.
Wastes that might react with each other must be defined and classified in groups of compatibility; the different groups of compatibility must be physically separated in the storage.
3.ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: SALT MINES
3.1.Importance of the geological barrier
In the safety philosophy for salt mines, the rock surrounding the waste has a two-fold role:
it acts as host rock in which the wastes are encapsulated;
together with the overlying and underlying impermeable rock strata (e.g. anhydrite), it acts as a geological barrier intended to prevent groundwater entering the landfill and, where necessary, effectively to stop liquids or gases escaping from the disposal area. Where this geological barrier is pierced by shafts and boreholes, these must be sealed during operation to secure against ingress of water, and must be hermetically closed after the underground landfill ceases to operate. If mineral extraction continues longer than the landfill operation, the disposal area must, after the landfill has ceased operating, be sealed with a hydraulically impermeable dam which is constructed according to the calculated hydraulically operative pressure corresponding to the depth, so that water which may seep into the still operating mine cannot penetrate through to the landfill area;
in salt mines, the salt is considered to provide total containment. The wastes will only make contact with the biosphere in the case of an accident or an event in geological time such as earth movement or erosion (for example, associated with sea-level rise). The waste is unlikely to change in storage, and the consequences of such failure scenarios must be considered.
3.2.Long-term assessment
The demonstration of long-term safety of underground disposal in a salt rock should be principally undertaken by designating the salt rock as the barrier rock. Salt rock fulfils the requirement of being impermeable to gases and liquids, of being able to encase the waste because of its convergent behaviour and of confining it entirely at the end of the transformation process.
The convergent behaviour of the salt rock thus does not contradict the requirement to have stable cavities in the operation phase. The stability is important, in order to guarantee the operational safety and in order to maintain the integrity of the geological barrier over unlimited time, so that there is continued protection of the biosphere. The wastes should be isolated permanently from the biosphere. Controlled subsidence of the overburden or other defects over long time are acceptable only if it can be shown, that only rupture-free transformations will occur, the integrity of the geological barrier is maintained and no pathways are formed by which water would be able to contact the wastes or the wastes or components of the waste migrate to the biosphere.
4.ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: HARD ROCK
Deep storage in hard rock is here defined as an underground storage at several hundred metres depth, where hard rock includes various igneous rocks, e.g. granite or gneiss, it may also include sedimentary rocks, e.g. limestone and sandstone.
4.1.Safety philosophy
A deep storage in hard rock is a feasible way to avoid burdening future generations with the responsibility of the wastes since it should be constructed to be passive and with no need for maintenance. Furthermore, the construction should not obstruct recovery of the wastes or the ability to undertake future corrective measures. It should also be designed to ensure that negative environmental effects or liabilities resulting from the activities of present generations do not fall upon future generations.
In the safety philosophy of underground disposal of wastes, the main concept is isolation of the waste from the biosphere, as well as natural attenuation of any pollutants leaking from the waste. For certain types of hazardous substances and waste, a need has been identified to protect the society and the environment against sustained exposure over extended periods of time. An extended period of time implies several thousands of years. Such levels of protection can be achieved by deep storage in hard rock. A deep storage for waste in hard rock can be located either in a former mine, where the mining activities have come to an end, or in a new storage facility.
In the case of hard-rock storage, total containment is not possible. In this case, an underground storage needs to be constructed so that natural attenuation of the surrounding strata mediates the effect of pollutants to the extent that they have no irreversible negative effects on the environment. This means that the capacity of the near environment to attenuate and degrade pollutants will determine the acceptability of a release from such a facility.
...
Gas formation may occur in deep storage in hard rock due to long-term deterioration of waste, packaging and engineered structures. Therefore, this must be considered in the design of premises for a deep storage in hard rock.
Appendix B
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .