🔆 📖 👤

Statutory Instruments

2004 No. 66

DEFENCE

The Naval Discipline Act 1957 (Remedial) Order 2004

Made

14th January 2004

Laid before Parliament

15th January 2004

Coming into force

16th January 2004

Whereas it appears to the Secretary of State that, having regard to a finding of the European Court of Human Rights( 1 ) made after the coming into force of section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998( 2 ) in proceedings against the United Kingdom, certain provisions of the Naval Discipline Act 1957( 3 ) are incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention( 4 );

And whereas the Secretary of State considers that there are compelling reasons for proceeding by way of a remedial order( 5 ) to make such amendments to the Naval Discipline Act 1957 as he considers necessary to remove the incompatibility;

And whereas it appears to the Secretary of State that, because of the urgency of the matter, it is necessary to make the order without a draft being approved by resolution of each House of Parliament;

Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 10(2) of, and paragraph 1(1)(a), (2) and (3) of Schedule 2 to, the Human Rights Act 1998, hereby makes the following Order:

Citation and Commencement

1. This Order may be cited as the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (Remedial) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 16th January 2004.

Amendment of the Naval Discipline Act 1957

2. —(1)The Naval Discipline Act 1957 is amended as follows.

(2) In section 47M(1) and (2)(c), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 6 ).

(3) In section 52FG(1), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 7 ).

(4) In section 52FJ(3), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 8 ).

(5) In section 53B(1), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 9 ).

(6) In section 53C(2), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 10 ).

(7) In section 59(4A), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”( 11 ).

Amendment of the Courts-Martial (Royal Navy) Rules 1997

3. —(1) The Courts-Martial (Royal Navy) Rules 1997( 12 ) are amended as follows.

(2) In rule 2 in the definition of “the judge advocate”, for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(3) In rule 8(2)(b), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(4) In rule 9—

(a) in paragraph (1), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate, or an officer” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet, or a person”; and

(b) in paragraph (2), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

Amendment of the Naval Custody Rules 2000

4. —(1) The Naval Custody Rules 2000( 13 ) are amended as follows.

(2) In rule 2(3), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(3) In rule 16(1), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(4) In rule 18(1), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

Amendment of the Summary Appeal Court (Navy) Rules 2000

5. —(1) The Summary Appeal Court (Navy) Rules 2000( 14 ) are amended as follows.

(2) In rule 2(2), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(3) In rule 12(5)(a), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(4) In rule 15(3)(c), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

(5) In rule 22(1)(d), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

Amendment of the Administration of Oaths (Summary Appeal Court) (Navy) Order 2000

6. In article 2(1)(a) of the Administration of Oaths (Summary Appeal Court) (Navy) Order 2000( 15 ), for “Chief Naval Judge Advocate” there is substituted “Judge Advocate of Her Majesty’s Fleet”.

Ivor Caplin

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence

14th January 2004

( 1 )

In the case of Mark Grieves v United Kingdom (Application No. 57067/00), judgment of 16th December 2003.

( 2 )

1998 c. 42 .

( 3 )

1957 c. 53 .

( 4 )

See section 21(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the meaning of “the Convention”.

( 5 )

See section 21(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the meaning of “remedial order”.

( 6 )

Section 47M was inserted by section 7(2) of the Armed Forces Discipline Act 2000 (c. 4) and subsection (2) was amended by paragraph 36(2) of Schedule 6 to the Armed Forces Act 2001 (c. 19) .

( 7 )

Section 52FG was inserted by section 15(2) of the Armed Forces Discipline Act 2000 (c. 4) .

( 8 )

Section 52FJ was inserted by section 17(2) of the Armed Forces Discipline Act 2000 (c. 4) .

( 9 )

Section 53B was inserted by paragraph 51 of Schedule 1 to the Armed Forces Act 1996 (c. 46) .

( 10 )

Section 53C was inserted by paragraph 51 of Schedule 1 to the Armed Forces Act 1996 (c. 46) and was amended by paragraph 15 of Schedule 2 to the Armed Forces Act 2001 (c. 19) .

( 11 )

Section 59(4A) was inserted by paragraph 58(6) of Schedule 1 to the Armed Forces Act 1996 (c. 46) .

( 12 )

S.I. 1997/170 , amended by S.I. 2000/2373 , 2002/231 .

( 13 )

S.I. 2000/2367 .

( 14 )

S.I. 2000/2370 .

( 15 )

S.I. 2000/2376 .

Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
The Naval Discipline Act 1957 (Remedial) Order 2004 (2004/66)

Displaying information

Status of this instrument

footnotecommentarytransitional and savingsin force statusrelated provisionsgeo extentinsert/omitsource countin force adj
Defined TermSection/ArticleIDScope of Application

Status of changes to instrument text

The list includes made instruments, both those in force and those yet to come into force. Typically, instruments that are not yet in force (hence their changes are not incorporated into the text above) are indicated by description 'not yet' in the changes made column.