πŸ”† πŸ“– βž• πŸ‘€

Statutory Instruments

2008 No. 1639

Employment And Training

The Industrial Training Levy (Reasonable Steps) Regulations 2008

Made

21st June 2008

Laid before Parliament

27th June 2008

Coming into force

21st July 2008

The Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 11(6B) and (6C) of the Industrial Training Act 1982( 1 ).

In accordance with section 88(2) of the Scotland Act 1998( 2 ) the Secretary of State has consulted the Scottish Ministers.

Citation and commencement

1. These Regulations may be cited as the Industrial Training Levy (Reasonable Steps) Regulations 2008 and come into force on 21st July 2008.

Interpretation

2. In these Regulationsβ€”

β€œ1982 Act” means the Industrial Training Act 1982;

β€œboard” means an industrial training board;

β€œindependent research company” means a body carrying out research thatβ€”

(i)

is not funded wholly or mainly out of public funds; and

(ii)

does not have a proprietor, directors or shadow directors who are also members of the board appointing it to carry out the sample;

β€œlevy proposals” means levy proposals which a board intends to submit to the Secretary of State under section 11(1) of the 1982 Act;

β€œnecessary” means necessary to encourage adequate training in the industry to which the levy proposals relate;

β€œprescribed organisation” means an organisation of the description specified in regulation 4;

β€œpublic funds” means moneys provided by Parliament;

β€œrelevant person” means a person who is likely to be liable to make payments by way of levy in consequence of the levy proposals;

β€œshadow director” means a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors are accustomed to act, but a person is not to be regarded as a shadow director by reason only that the directors act on advice given by that person in a professional capacity; and

β€œunrepresented person” means a relevant person who is not represented by a prescribed organisation.

Reasonable steps to ascertain views

3. Any of the following combinations of steps in the Schedule constitutes β€œreasonable steps” for the purposes of section 11(6)(a) of the 1982 Actβ€”

(a) the steps in paragraphs 1 and 2;

(b) the steps inβ€”

(i) paragraphs 1 and 2; and

(ii) paragraph 3;

(c) the steps inβ€”

(i) paragraphs 1 and 2; and

(ii) paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 5;

(d) the steps in paragraphs 4(a) and 5.

Prescribed organisations

4. An organisation is of a description prescribed for the purposes of section 11(6C)(b) of the 1982 Act if it represents relevant persons.

David Lammy

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills

21st June 2008

Regulation 3

SCHEDULE REASONABLE STEPS

PART 1 ASCERTAINING VIEWS BY MEANS OF CONSULTATION

Consultation of prescribed organisations

1. It is a reasonable step for a board to consult prescribed organisations.

Relevant persons represented by prescribed organisations treated as having the same view as the organisation

2. β€”(1) Subject to sub-paragraph (2), where a boardβ€”

(a) has consulted a prescribed organisation in relation to levy proposals; and

(b) that organisation has formed a view as to whether the proposals are necessary,

the board may treat relevant persons represented by that organisation as having the same view about the proposals as the organisation.

(2) Sub-paragraph (1) does not apply where a prescribed organisation consulted by a board has not taken reasonably practicable steps to ascertain the views of relevant persons that it represents prior to forming its view on the levy proposals.

Consultation of unrepresented persons

3. Where a boardβ€”

(a) has consulted prescribed organisations in accordance with paragraph 1;

(b) is not relying on a sample obtained in accordance with Part 2; and

(c) considers it necessary to ascertain the views of further relevant persons,

it is a reasonable step for the board to endeavour to obtain the views of all unrepresented persons.

PART 2 ASCERTAINING VIEWS BY MEANS OF A SAMPLE

Persons whose views may be sampled

4. It is a reasonable step for a board to obtain by way of a sample the views of

(a) all relevant persons; or

(b) all unrepresented persons, where a board has consulted prescribed organisations in accordance with paragraph 1,

provided that sample complies with paragraph 5.

Samples

5. A sample must beβ€”

(a) obtained by an independent research company;

(b) designed to ascertainβ€”

(i) the number, expressed as a percentage, of relevant persons or unrepresented persons, as the case may be, who consider that the proposals are necessary; and

(ii) the value, expressed as a percentage, of the total amount of levy likely to be payable in consequence of the levy proposals by relevant persons or unrepresented persons, as the case may be, who consider that the proposals are necessary; and

(c) of a size sufficient to enable any conclusions reached to be stated with at least a 95% level of confidence.

( 1 )

1982 c.10 Sections 11 and 12 were amended by paragraphs 10 and 11 respectively of Schedule 4 to the Employment Act 1989 (c.38) . Section 11 was also amended by sections 24 and 25 of the Further Education and Training Act 2007 (c. 25) .

( 2 )

1998 c.46 These regulations relate to Scotland only so far as they are relevant to two industrial training boards which have been specified as cross-border public authorities for the purposes of section 88 of the Scotland Act 1998 by the Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) Specification Order 1999 ( S.I. 1999/1319 ). Those two authorities are: the Construction Industry Training Board and the Engineering Construction Industry Training Board.

Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
The Industrial Training Levy (Reasonable Steps) Regulations 2008 (2008/1639)

Displaying information

Status of this instrument

footnotecommentarytransitional and savingsin force statusrelated provisionsgeo extentinsert/omitsource countin force adj
Defined TermSection/ArticleIDScope of Application
1982 Actreg. 2.1982_Act_rtQ54q9
boardreg. 2.board_rt4yBrv
independent research companyreg. 2.independen_rt6E7Gq
levy proposalsreg. 2.levy_propo_rtWSEul
necessaryreg. 2.necessary_rtKaSwM
prescribed organisationreg. 2.prescribed_rtuDUTl
public fundsreg. 2.public_fun_rthStmR
reasonable stepsreg. 3.reasonable_rtnUxMK
relevant personreg. 2.relevant_p_rt25vtO
shadow directorreg. 2.shadow_dir_rtl71rx
unrepresented personreg. 2.unrepresen_rtrpFXo

Status of changes to instrument text

The list includes made instruments, both those in force and those yet to come into force. Typically, instruments that are not yet in force (hence their changes are not incorporated into the text above) are indicated by description 'not yet' in the changes made column.