Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 16 April 2014
on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee(1),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure(2),
Whereas:
(1) Statutory auditors and audit firms are entrusted by law to conduct statutory audits of public-interest entities with a view to enhancing the degree of confidence of the public in the annual and consolidated financial statements of such entities. The public-interest function of statutory audit means that a broad community of people and institutions rely on the quality of a statutory auditor's or an audit firm's work. Good audit quality contributes to the orderly functioning of markets by enhancing the integrity and efficiency of financial statements. Thus, statutory auditors fulfil a particularly important societal role.
(2) Union legislation requires that the financial statements, comprising annual financial statements or consolidated financial statements, of credit institutions, insurance undertakings, issuers of securities admitted to trading on a regulated market, payment institutions, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), electronic money institutions and alternative investment funds be audited by one or more persons entitled to carry out such audits in accordance with Union law, namely: Article 1(1) of Council Directive 86/635/EEC(3), Article 1(1) of Council Directive 91/674/EEC(4), Article 4(4) of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5), Article 15(2) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), Article 73 of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(7), Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8), and Article 22(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(9). Moreover, point (1) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10) also requires that the annual financial statements of investment firms be audited when Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(11) is not applicable.
(3) The conditions for the approval of the persons responsible for carrying out the statutory audit as well as the minimum requirements for carrying out such statutory audit are laid down in Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(12).
(4) On 13 October 2010 the Commission published a Green Paper entitled ‘Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis’, which launched a wide public consultation, in the general context of financial market regulatory reform, on the role and scope of audit and how the audit function could be enhanced in order to contribute to increased financial stability. That public consultation showed that the rules of Directive 2006/43/EC regarding the carrying out of the statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements of public-interest entities could be improved. The European Parliament issued an own-initiative report on the Green Paper on 13 September 2011. The European Economic and Social Committee also adopted a report on that Green Paper on 16 June 2011.
(5) It is important to lay down detailed rules with a view to ensuring that the statutory audits of public-interest entities are of adequate quality and are carried out by statutory auditors and audit firms subject to stringent requirements. A common regulatory approach should enhance the integrity, independence, objectivity, responsibility, transparency and reliability of statutory auditors and audit firms carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities, contributing to the quality of statutory audits in the Union, thus to the smooth functioning of the internal market, while achieving a high level of consumer and investor protection. The development of a separate act for public-interest entities should also ensure consistent harmonisation and uniform application of the rules and thus contribute to a more effective functioning of the internal market. These strict requirements should be applicable to statutory auditors and audit firms only insofar as they carry out statutory audits of public-interest entities.
(6) The statutory audit of cooperatives and savings banks is characterised in some Member States by a system that does not allow them to choose their statutory auditor or audit firm freely. The audit association to which the cooperative or savings bank belongs as a member is obliged by law to carry out the statutory audit. Such audit associations act on a non-profit-making basis without pursuing commercial interests, as results from their legal nature. In addition, the organisational units of these associations are not associated with a common economic interest, which could jeopardise their independence. Accordingly, Member States should have the possibility to exempt cooperatives within the meaning of point (14) of Article 2 of Directive 2006/43/EC, savings banks or similar entities as referred to in Article 45 of Directive 86/635/EEC or their subsidiaries or legal successors from this Regulation provided that the principles of independence laid down in Directive 2006/43/EC are complied with.
(7) The level of fees received from one audited entity and the structure of fees can threaten the independence of a statutory auditor or an audit firm. Thus, it is important to ensure that audit fees are not based on any form of contingency and that, when the audit fees from a single client including its subsidiaries are significant, a specific procedure involving the audit committee is established to secure the quality of the audit. If the statutory auditor or the audit firm becomes excessively dependent on a single client, the audit committee should decide on the basis of proper grounds whether the statutory auditor or the audit firm may continue to carry out the statutory audit. When taking such decision, the audit committee should take into consideration, inter alia, the threats to independence and the consequences of such decision.
(8) The provision of certain services other than statutory audit (non-audit services) to audited entities by statutory auditors, audit firms or members of their networks may compromise their independence. Therefore, it is appropriate to prohibit the provision of certain non-audit services such as specific tax, consultancy and advisory services to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings within the Union. The services that involve playing any part in the management or decision-making of the audited entity might include working capital management, providing financial information, business process optimisation, cash management, transfer pricing, creating supply chain efficiency and the like. Services linked to the financing, capital structure and allocation, and investment strategy of the audited entity should be prohibited except the provision of services such as due diligence services, issuing comfort letters in connection with prospectuses issued by the audited entity and other assurance services.
(9) It should be possible for Member States to decide to allow the statutory auditors and the audit firms to provide certain tax and valuation services when such services are immaterial or have no direct effect, separately or in the aggregate, on the audited financial statements. Where such services involve aggressive tax planning, they should not be considered as immaterial. Accordingly, a statutory auditor or an audit firm should not provide such services to the audited entity. A statutory auditor or an audit firm should be able to provide non-audit services which are not prohibited under this Regulation, if the provision of those services has been approved in advance by the audit committee and if the statutory auditor or the audit firm has satisfied itself that provision of those services does not pose a threat to the independence of the statutory auditor or the audit firm that cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards.
(10) With a view to avoiding conflicts of interest it is important that the statutory auditor or the audit firm, before accepting or continuing an engagement for a statutory audit of a public-interest entity, assess whether the independence requirements are met, and in particular whether any threats to independence arise as a result of the relationship with that entity. The statutory auditor or the audit firm should confirm its independence annually to the audit committee of the audited entity and should discuss with that committee any threat to its independence as well as the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats.
(11) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13) should govern the processing of personal data carried out in the Member States in the context of this Regulation and such processing of personal data should be subject to the supervision of the Member States' competent authorities, in particular the public independent authorities designated by the Member States. Any exchange or transmission of information by competent authorities should comply with the rules on the transfer of personal data as laid down in Directive 95/46/EC.
(12) A sound engagement quality control review of the work carried out in each statutory audit engagement should be conducive to high audit quality. Therefore, the statutory auditor or the audit firm should not issue his, her or its audit report until such an engagement quality control review has been completed.
(13) The results of the statutory audit of a public-interest entity should be presented to the stakeholders in the audit report. In order to increase the confidence of stakeholders in the financial statements of the audited entity, it is particularly important that the audit report be well-founded and solidly substantiated. In addition to the information required to be provided under Article 28 of Directive 2006/43/EC, the audit report should in particular include sufficient information on the independence of the statutory auditor or the audit firm and on whether the statutory audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud.
(14) The value of statutory audit for the audited entity would be particularly enhanced if the communication between the statutory auditor or the audit firm, on the one hand, and the audit committee, on the other hand, were reinforced. Further to the regular dialogue during the carrying out of the statutory audit, it is important that the statutory auditor or the audit firm submit to the audit committee an additional and more detailed report on the results of the statutory audit. This additional report should be submitted to the audit committee no later than the audit report. Upon request, the statutory auditor or the audit firm should discuss key matters which have been mentioned in the additional report with the audit committee. In addition, it should be possible to make such additional detailed report available to competent authorities responsible for the oversight of statutory auditors and audit firms upon their request, and to third parties where national law so provides.
(15) Statutory auditors or audit firms already provide competent authorities supervising public-interest entities with information on facts or decisions which could constitute a breach of the rules governing the activities of the audited entity or an impairment of the continuous functioning of the audited entity. However, supervisory tasks would be facilitated if supervisors of credit institutions and insurance undertakings and their statutory auditors and audit firms were required to establish an effective dialogue with each other.
(16) Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council(14) established the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). The role of the ESRB is to monitor the build-up of systemic risk in the Union. Given the information that statutory auditors and audit firms of systemically important financial institutions have access to, their experience could help the ESRB in its work. Therefore an annual forum for dialogue between statutory auditors and audit firms, on the one hand, and ESRB, on the other, on a sectoral, anonymised basis should be facilitated by this Regulation.
(17) In order to increase the confidence in, and the liability of, the statutory auditors and the audit firms carrying out the statutory audit of public-interest entities, it is important that the transparency reporting by statutory auditors and audit firms be increased. Therefore, statutory auditors and audit firms should be required to disclose financial information, showing in particular their total turnover divided into audit fees paid by public-interest entities, audit fees paid by other entities and fees for other services. They should also disclose financial information at the level of the network to which they belong. Statutory auditors and audit firms should provide additional supplementary information on audit fees to competent authorities with a view to facilitating their supervisory tasks.
(18) It is important that the role of the audit committee in the selection of a new statutory auditor or audit firm be reinforced, in the interest of a more informed decision of the general meeting of shareholders or members of the audited entity. Hence, when making a proposal to the general meeting, the administrative or supervisory body should explain whether it follows the preference of the audit committee and, if not, why. The recommendation of the audit committee should include at least two possible choices for the audit engagement and a duly justified preference for one of them, so that a real choice can be made. In order to provide a fair and proper justification in its recommendation, the audit committee should use the results of a mandatory selection procedure organised by the audited entity, under the responsibility of the audit committee. In such selection procedure, the audited entity should not restrict statutory auditors or audit firms with a low market share from presenting proposals for the audit engagement. Tender documents should contain transparent and non-discriminatory selection criteria to be used for the evaluation of proposals. Considering, however, that this selection procedure could entail disproportionate costs for undertakings with reduced market capitalisation or small and medium-sized public-interest entities having regard to their size, it is appropriate to relieve such undertakings and entities from the obligation of organising a procedure for the selection of a new statutory auditor or audit firm.
(19) The right of the general meeting of shareholders or members of the audited entity to choose the statutory auditor or the audit firm would be of no value if the audited entity were to enter into a contract with a third party providing for a restriction of such choice. Therefore, any clause of a contract entered into by the audited entity with a third party regarding the appointment or restricting the choice to particular statutory auditors or audit firms should be considered null and void.
(20) The appointment of more than one statutory auditor or audit firm by public-interest entities would reinforce the professional scepticism and help to increase audit quality. Also, this measure, combined with the presence of smaller audit firms in the audit market would facilitate the development of the capacity of such firms, thus broadening the choice of statutory auditors and audit firms for public-interest entities. Therefore, the latter should be encouraged and incentivised to appoint more than one statutory auditor or audit firm to carry out the statutory audit.
(21) In order to address the familiarity threat and therefore reinforce the independence of statutory auditors and audit firms, it is important to establish a maximum duration of the audit engagement of a statutory auditor or an audit firm in a particular audited entity. In addition, as a means of strengthening the independence of the statutory auditor or the audit firm, reinforcing professional scepticism, and increasing audit quality, this Regulation provides for the following alternatives for an extension of the maximum duration: regular and open mandatory retendering or the appointment of more than one statutory auditor or audit firm by public-interest entities. Also, the involvement of smaller audit firms in these measures would facilitate the development of the capacity of such firms, thus broadening the choice of statutory auditors and audit firms for public-interest entities. An appropriate gradual rotation mechanism should also be established with regard to the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm. It is also important to provide for an appropriate period within which such statutory auditor or audit firm may not carry out the statutory audit of the same entity. In order to ensure a smooth transition, the former statutory auditor should transfer a handover file with relevant information to the incoming statutory auditor.
(22) In order to ensure a high level of investor and consumer confidence in the internal market by avoiding conflicts of interests, statutory auditors and audit firms should be subject to appropriate oversight by competent authorities which are independent from the audit profession and which have adequate capacity, expertise and resources. Member States should be able to delegate or allow their competent authorities to delegate any of the tasks of those competent authorities to other authorities or bodies except those related to the quality assurance system, investigations and disciplinary systems. However, Member States should be able to choose to delegate tasks related to disciplinary systems to other authorities and bodies provided that the majority of the persons involved in the governance of the authority or body concerned are independent from the audit profession. The national competent authorities should have the necessary powers to undertake their supervisory tasks, including the capacity to access data, obtain information and carry out inspections. They should specialise in the supervision of financial markets, in the compliance with financial reporting obligations or in statutory audit oversight. However, it should be possible for the supervision of the compliance with the obligations imposed on public-interest entities to be carried out by the competent authorities responsible for the supervision of those entities. The funding of the competent authorities should be free from any undue influence by statutory auditors or audit firms.
(23) The quality of supervision should improve if there is effective cooperation between authorities charged with different tasks at national level. Therefore, the authorities competent to supervise compliance with the obligations regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities should cooperate with the authorities responsible for the tasks provided for in Directive 2006/43/EC, with those supervising public-interest entities and with the financial intelligence units referred to in Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(15).
(24) External quality assurance for the statutory audit is fundamental for high quality audit. It adds credibility to published financial information and provides better protection for shareholders, investors, creditors and other interested parties. Statutory auditors and audit firms should therefore be subject to a system of quality assurance under the responsibility of the competent authorities, thus ensuring objectivity and independence from the audit profession. Quality assurance reviews should be organised in such a manner that each statutory auditor or each audit firm carrying out audits of public-interest entities is subject to a quality assurance review on the basis of an analysis of the risks. In the case of statutory auditors and audit firms carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities other than those defined in points (17) and (18) of Article 2 of Directive 2006/43/EC, that review should take place at least every three years and, in other cases, at least every six years. The Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2008 on external quality assurance for statutory auditors and audit firms auditing public-interest entities(16) provides information on how inspections should be undertaken. Quality assurance reviews should be appropriate and proportionate in view of the scale and complexity of the business of the reviewed statutory auditor or audit firm.
(25) The market for the provision of statutory audit services to public-interest entities evolves over time. It is therefore necessary that competent authorities monitor the developments in the market, particularly as regards the risks that arise from high market concentration, including within specific sectors, and the performance of audit committees.
(26) The transparency of the activities of competent authorities should help to increase the confidence of investors and consumers in the internal market. Therefore, competent authorities should be required to report regularly on their activities and to publish information in aggregated form on findings and conclusions of inspections, or in individual form where Member States so provide.
(27) Cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States can make an important contribution to ensuring consistently high quality of statutory audit in the Union. Therefore, the competent authorities of the Member States should cooperate with each other, where necessary, for the purpose of carrying out their supervisory duties regarding statutory audits. They should respect the principle of home-country regulation and oversight by the Member State in which the statutory auditor or the audit firm is approved and in which the audited entity has its registered office. The cooperation between competent authorities should be organised within the framework of a Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies (CEAOB), which should be composed of high-level representatives of the competent authorities. In order to enhance consistent application of this Regulation, the CEAOB should be able to adopt non-binding guidelines or opinions. In addition, it should facilitate the exchange of information, provide advice to the Commission and contribute to technical assessments and technical examinations. For the purpose of carrying out the technical assessment of public oversight systems of third countries and to the international cooperation between Member States and third countries in this area, the CEAOB should establish a sub-group chaired by the member appointed by the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority — ESMA)(17) and should request the assistance from ESMA, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority — EBA)(18) or the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — EIOPA)(19) insofar as its request is related to the international cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of statutory audit of public-interest entities supervised by these European Supervisory Authorities. The Secretariat of the CEAOB should be provided by the Commission and, based on the work programme agreed by the CEAOB, should include related expenses in its estimates for the next year.
(28) The scope of cooperation between the competent authorities of Member States should include cooperation with regard to quality assurance reviews and assistance with investigations related to the carrying-out of statutory audits of public-interest entities, including in cases where the conduct under investigation does not constitute an infringement of any legislative or regulatory provision in force in the Member States concerned. The detailed arrangements for cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States should include the possibility of creating colleges of competent authorities and the delegation of tasks among themselves. The concept of a network in which statutory auditors and audit firms operate should be taken into account in such cooperation. Competent authorities should respect appropriate confidentiality and professional secrecy rules.
(29) The interrelation of capital markets gives rise to the need to empower competent authorities to cooperate with supervisory authorities and bodies of third countries regarding the exchange of information or quality assurance reviews. However, where the cooperation with third country authorities is related to audit working papers or other documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms, the procedures laid down by Directive 2006/43/EC should apply.
(30) Sustainable audit capacity and a competitive market for statutory audit services in which there is a sufficient choice of statutory auditors and audit firms capable of carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities are required in order to ensure a smooth functioning of capital markets. The competent authorities and the European Competition Network (ECN) should report on the changes brought in the audit market structure introduced by this Regulation.
(31) The alignment of the procedures for the adoption of delegated acts by the Commission to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and, in particular, to Article 290 and 291 thereof, should be effected on a case-by-case basis. In order to take into account the developments in auditing and in the audit profession, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. In particular, delegated acts are necessary for the purpose of adopting international auditing standards in the area of audit practice, independence of and internal controls of statutory auditors and audit firms. The international auditing standards adopted should not amend any requirements of this Regulation or supplement any of those requirements, except for those precisely defined. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including consultations at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
(32) In order to ensure legal certainty and the smooth transition to the regime introduced by this Regulation, it is important to introduce a transitional period regarding the entry into force of the obligation to rotate statutory auditors and audit firms and the obligation to organise a selection procedure for the choice of statutory auditors and audit firms.
(33) References to provisions of Directive 2006/43/EC should be understood as references to the national provisions transposing those provisions of Directive 2006/43/EC. The new European audit framework as established by this Regulation and Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(20) replaces existing requirements laid down in Directive 2006/43/EC and should be interpreted without referring to any preceding instruments such as Commission recommendations adopted under the previous framework.
(34) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely clarifying and better defining the role of statutory audit regarding public-interest entities, improving the information that the statutory auditor or the audit firm provides to the audited entity, investors and other stakeholders, improving the communication channels between auditors and supervisors of public-interest entities, preventing any conflict of interest arising from the provision of non-audit services to public-interest entities, mitigating the risk of any potential conflict of interest due to the existing system whereby the auditee selects and pays the auditor or the familiarity threat, facilitating the switching of, and the choice of a statutory auditor or an audit firm to public-interest entities, broadening the choice of statutory auditors and audit firms for public-interest entities and improving the effectiveness, independence and consistency of the regulation and oversight of statutory auditors and audit firms providing statutory audits to public-interest entities including as regards cooperation at Union level, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of their scale, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
(35) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the right to respect for private and family life, the right to the protection of personal data, and the freedom to conduct a business, and has to be applied in accordance with those rights and principles.
(36) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and delivered an opinion on 23 April 2012(21).
(37) A new legal framework of statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements should be established by this Regulation and Directive 2014/56/EU, therefore Commission Decision 2005/909/EC(22) should be repealed,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
TITLE I SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
Article 1 Subject matter
F3,F3This Regulation lays down requirements for the carrying out of the statutory audit of [F1accounts and consolidated accountsF1] of public-interest entities, rules on the [F2organisation of statutory auditors and selection of persons for appointment asF2] statutory auditors ... by public-interest entities to promote their independence and the avoidance of conflicts of interest and rules on the supervision of compliance by statutory auditors ... with those requirements.
Article 2 Scope
1.This Regulation shall apply to the following:
(a)F4statutory auditors ... carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities;
(b)public-interest entities.
[F5 2.This Regulation shall apply without prejudice to—
(a)Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and any corresponding provision in Part 6 of the Friendly Societies Act 1992 and Part 8 of the Building Societies Act 1986,
(b)Part 42 of the Companies Act 2006,
(c)any subordinate legislation made under legislation in subparagraphs (a) or (b), and
(d)the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016.F5]
F63.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F64.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F65.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[F7Article 3 Definitions
1.For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions laid down in the following legislation apply—
(a)Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and any corresponding provision in Part 6 of the Friendly Societies Act 1992 and Part 8 of the Building Societies Act 1986,
(b)Part 42 of the Companies Act 2006,
(c)any subordinate legislation made under legislation in subparagraphs (a) or (b), and
(d)the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016.
2.The following definitions also apply—
-
“ the competent authority's tasks ” means the competent authority's tasks under—
(a)this Regulation,
(b)the provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors of public interest entities,
(c)the public interest entity audit reporting requirements,
(d)Part 42 of the Companies Act 2006 and any subordinate legislation made under that Part, or
(e)the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016;
-
“ management body ” means, in relation to a company, the board of directors, and in relation to any other kind of undertaking, the persons or body of persons responsible for the management of the undertaking concerned;
-
“ public interest entity audit reporting requirements ” means the audit reporting requirements applicable to public interest entities, excluding the reference to Articles 10 and 11 of this Regulation;
-
“ provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors by public interest entities ” means—
(a)for a company, sections 485A to 485C, 489A to 489C, and 494ZA of the Companies Act 2006;
(b)for a building society, paragraphs 3B to 3E of Schedule 11 to the Building Societies Act 1986;
(c)for a friendly society that is subject to special requirements, paragraphs 2 to 5 of Schedule 14A to the Friendly Societies Act 1992;
(d)for an insurance undertaking under the Insurance Accounts Directive (Miscellaneous Insurance Undertakings) Regulations 2008, sections 485A to 485C, and 494ZA of the Companies Act 2006 as applied by regulation 6(1A) of those Regulations;
(e)for a limited liability partnership, sections 485A to 485C, and 494ZA of the Companies Act 2006 as applied by regulation 36 and 38A of the Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application of the Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2008.F7]
TITLE II CONDITIONS FOR CARRYING OUT STATUTORY AUDIT OF PUBLIC INTEREST ENTITIES
Article 4 Audit fees
1.F8...
F9 ... For the purposes of [F10 paragraph 13 of Schedule 1 to the Statutory Auditor and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 , F10] fees [F11 “based on any form of contingency” F11] means fees for audit engagements calculated on a predetermined basis relating to the outcome or result of a transaction or the result of the work performed. Fees shall not be regarded as [F12 being based on any form of contingency F12] if a court or [F13 the competent authority F13] has established them.
2.F14When the statutory auditor ... provides to the [F15audited personF15] , its parent undertaking or its [F16subsidiary undertakingsF16] , for a period of three or more consecutive financial years, non-audit services other than those referred to in Article 5(1) of this Regulation, the total fees for such services shall be limited to no more than 70 % of the average of the fees paid in the last three consecutive financial years for the statutory audit(s) of the [F15audited personF15] and, where applicable, of its parent undertaking, of its [F16subsidiary undertakingsF16] and of the consolidated [F17accountsF17] of that group of undertakings.
For the purposes of the limits specified in the first subparagraph, non-audit services, other than those referred to in Article 5(1), required by [F18legislation of any part of the United KingdomF18] shall be excluded.
F19...
3.F20,F21,F23When the total fees received from a public-interest entity in each of the last three consecutive financial years are more than 15 % of the total fees received by the statutory auditor ... in each of those financial years, such a statutory auditor ... shall disclose that fact to the audit committee and discuss with the audit committee the threats to [F22its independenceF22] and the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats. The audit committee shall consider whether the audit ... should be subject to an engagement quality control review by another [F24person who is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditorF24] prior to the issuance of the audit report.
F25Where the fees received from such a public-interest entity continue to exceed 15 % of the total fees received by such a statutory auditor ..., the audit committee shall decide on the basis of objective grounds whether the statutory auditor [F26of the public interest entityF26] may continue to carry out the statutory audit for an additional period which shall not, in any case, exceed two years.
F274.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 5 Prohibition of the provision of non-audit services
1.F28,F29,F33A statutory auditor ... carrying out the statutory audit of a public-interest entity, or any member of the network to which the statutory auditor ... belongs, shall not directly or indirectly provide to the [F30audited personF30] , to its parent undertaking [F31(incorporated or formed in any part of the United Kingdom)F31] or to its [F32subsidiary undertakingsF32] ... any prohibited non-audit services in:
(a)the period between the beginning of the [F34financial year of the accounts to be auditedF34] and the issuing of the audit report; and
[X1 (b)the financial year immediately preceding [F35 that periodF35] in relation to the services listed in point (e) of the second subparagraph.X1]
For the purposes of this Article, prohibited non-audit services shall mean:
(a)tax services relating to:
preparation of tax forms;
payroll tax;
customs duties;
F36 identification of public subsidies and tax incentives unless support from the statutory auditor ... in respect of such services is required by law;
F37 support regarding tax inspections by tax authorities unless support from the statutory auditor ... in respect of such inspections is required by law;
calculation of direct and indirect tax and deferred tax;
provision of tax advice;
(b)services that involve playing any part in the management or decision-making of the [F38audited personF38] ;
(c)bookkeeping and preparing accounting records and [F39accountsF39] ;
(d)payroll services;
(e)designing and implementing internal control or risk management procedures related to the preparation and/or control of financial information or designing and implementing financial information technology systems;
(f)valuation services, including valuations performed in connection with actuarial services or litigation support services;
(g)legal services, with respect to:
the provision of general counsel;
negotiating on behalf of the [F40audited personF40] ; and
acting in an advocacy role in the resolution of litigation;
(h)services related to the [F41audited person'sF41] internal audit function;
(i)services linked to the financing, capital structure and allocation, and investment strategy of the [F42audited personF42] , except providing assurance services in relation to the [F43accountsF43] , such as the issuing of comfort letters in connection with prospectuses issued by the audited entity;
(j)promoting, dealing in, or underwriting shares in the [F44audited personF44] ;
(k)human resources services, with respect to:
management in a position to exert significant influence over the preparation of the accounting records or [F45the accountsF45] which are the subject of the statutory audit, where such services involve:
-
searching for or seeking out candidates for such position; or
-
undertaking reference checks of candidates for such positions;
structuring the organisation design; and
cost control.
F462.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F473.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.F48,F49,F54A statutory auditor ... carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities and, where the statutory auditor ... belongs to a network, any member of such network, may provide to the [F50audited personF50] , to its parent undertaking [F51(incorporated or formed in any part of the United Kingdom)F51] or to its [F52subsidiary undertakingsF52] non-audit services other than the prohibited non-audit services referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 subject to the approval of the audit committee after it has properly assessed threats to independence and the safeguards applied in accordance with [F53paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 to the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016F53] . ...
F55...
F565.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 6 Preparation for the statutory audit and assessment of threats to independence
1.Before [F57appointment as a statutory auditor for theF57] statutory audit of a public- interest entity, [F58a person who is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditor mustF58] assess and document, in addition to [F59what is required by paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 to the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016F59] , the following:
(a)whether [F60the person who is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditorF60] complies with the requirements of Articles 4 and 5 of this Regulation;
(b)whether the conditions of [F61the provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors by public interest entities and Article 17(7)F61] are complied with;
(c)without prejudice to [F62the relevant legislationF62] , the integrity of the members of the [F63management bodyF63] of the public-interest entity.
[F64 1A. In point (c) of paragraph 1, “ relevant legislation ” means—
(a)the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017;
(b)sections 330(6), 330(7A), 333A and 342 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002;
(c)sections 45 and 46 of the Criminal Finances Act 2017;
(d)the Terrorism Act 2000.
1B.The reference to appointment as a statutory auditor for the statutory audit of a public interest entity in paragraph 1 means any appointment of the auditor by public interest entities and includes any deemed reappointment of the statutory auditor under section 487 of the Companies Act 2006.F64]
2.F65A statutory auditor ... shall:
(a)F66confirm annually in writing to the audit committee that the statutory auditor, ... [F67and, where the statutory auditor is a firm, any associated personsF67] , conducting the statutory audit are independent from the [F68audited personF68] ;
(b)discuss with the audit committee the threats to [F69the statutory auditor's independenceF69] and the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats, as documented [F70by the statutory auditorF70] pursuant to paragraph 1.
[F71 3. In this Article, “ associated persons ” means—
(a)partners if the firm is a partnership, general partners if the firm is a limited partnership, or members if the firm is a limited liability partnership;
(b)members of the management body of the firm; or
(c)individuals who are responsible for statutory audit work on behalf of the firm.F71]
Article 7 Irregularities cross-notes
F73Without prejudice to [F72relevant legislationF72] , when a statutory auditor ... carrying out the statutory audit of a public-interest entity suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that irregularities, including fraud with regard to the [F74accountsF74] of the [F75audited personF75] , may occur or have occurred, [F76the statutory auditorF76] shall inform the audited entity and invite it to investigate the matter and take appropriate measures to deal with such irregularities and to prevent any recurrence of such irregularities in the future.
F78,F79Where the [F77audited personF77] does not investigate the matter, the statutory auditor ... shall inform the authorities ... responsible for investigating such irregularities.
F80The disclosure in good faith to those authorities, by the statutory auditor ..., of any irregularities referred to in the first subparagraph shall not constitute a breach of any contractual or legal restriction on disclosure of information.
[F81 In this Article, “ relevant legislation ” means—
(a)any rules made under section 340 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
(b)the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Communications by Auditors) Regulations 2001;
(c)the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on Payer) Regulations 2017;
(d)sections 330(6), 330(7A), 333A and 342 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002;
(e)sections 45 and 46 of the Criminal Finances Act 2017;
(f)the Terrorism Act 2000.F81]
Article 8 Engagement quality control review cross-notes
1.Before the reports referred to in Articles 10 and 11 are issued, an engagement quality control review (in this Article hereinafter referred to as: review) shall be performed to assess whether the statutory auditor or the key audit partner could reasonably have come to the opinion and conclusions expressed in the draft of these reports.
2.The review shall be performed by an engagement quality control reviewer (in this Article hereinafter referred to as: reviewer). The reviewer shall be [F82person who is eligible for appointment as aF82] a statutory auditor who is not involved in the performance of the statutory audit to which the review relates.
[F83 3.By way of derogation from paragraph 2, where—
(a)the statutory auditor is a firm and all the individuals who were able to sign audit reports on behalf of the firm were involved in carrying out the statutory audit, or
(b)the statutory auditor is an individual,
the statutory auditor must arrange for another person who is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditor to perform a review. The disclosure of documents or information to the independent reviewer for the purposes of this Article does not constitute a breach of the statutory auditor's duty of confidentiality. Documents or information disclosed to the reviewer for the purposes of this Article must be subject to that duty.F83]
4.When performing the review, the reviewer shall record at least the following:
(a)F84the oral and written information provided by the ... key audit partner to support the significant judgements as well as the main findings of the audit procedures carried out and the conclusions drawn from those findings, whether or not at the request of the reviewer;
(b)F85the opinions of the ... key audit partner, as expressed in the draft of the reports referred to in Articles 10 and 11;
5.The review shall at least assess the following elements:
(a)F86the independence of the statutory auditor ... from the [F87audited personF87] ;
(b)F88the significant risks which are relevant to the statutory audit and which the ... key audit partner has identified during the performance of the statutory audit and the measures that [F89the key audit partnerF89] has taken to adequately manage those risks;
(c)F90the reasoning of the ... key audit partner, in particular with regard to the level of materiality and the significant risks referred to in point (b);
(d)any request for advice to external experts and the implementation of such advice;
(e)the nature and scope of the corrected and uncorrected misstatements in the [F91accountsF91] that were identified during the carrying out of the audit;
(f)the subjects discussed with the audit committee and [F92, where applicable,F92] the [F93management bodyF93] of the [F94audited personF94] ;
(g)the subjects discussed with [F95regulatory authoritiesF95] and, where applicable, with other third parties;
(h)F96whether the documents and information selected from the file by the reviewer support the opinion of the ... key audit partner as expressed in the draft of the reports referred to in Articles 10 and 11.
6.F97The reviewer shall discuss the results of the review with the ... key audit partner. [F98Where the statutory auditor is a firm, itF98] shall establish procedures for determining the manner in which any disagreement between the key audit partner and the reviewer are to be resolved.
7.F99The statutory auditor ... and the reviewer shall keep a record of the results of the review, together with the considerations underlying those results.
F100Article 9 International auditing standards
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 10 Audit report
1.The statutory [F101auditorF101] shall present the results of the statutory audit of the public-interest entity in an audit report.
2.The audit report shall be prepared in accordance with [F102the public interest entity audit reporting requirementsF102] and in addition shall at least:
(a)F104state by whom or by which body the statutory [F103auditorF103] was ... appointed;
(b)indicate the date of the appointment and the period of total uninterrupted [F105consecutive reappointments of the statutory auditorF105] ;
(c)provide, in support of the audit opinion, the following:
a description of the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement, including assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud;
a summary of the auditor's response to those risks; and
where relevant, key observations arising with respect to those risks.
Where relevant to the above information provided in the audit report concerning each significant assessed risk of material misstatement, the audit report shall include a clear reference to the relevant disclosures in the [F106accountsF106] .
(d)explain to what extent the statutory audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud;
(e)confirm that the audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee referred to in Article 11;
(f)declare that the prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) were not provided and that the statutory [F107auditorF107] remained independent of the [F108audited personF108] in conducting the audit;
(g)F109indicate any services, in addition to the statutory audit, which were provided by the statutory auditor ... to the [F110audited personF110] and its [F111subsidiary undertakingsF111] , and which have not been disclosed in the [F112accounts or the reports required to be prepared by the management body of the audited person to accompany the accountsF112] .
F113...
3.Except as required by point (e) of paragraph 2 the audit report shall not contain any cross-references to the additional report to the audit committee referred to in Article 11. The audit report shall be in clear and unambiguous language.
4.F114The statutory auditor ... shall not use the name of [F115the competent authorityF115] in a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by [F116the authorityF116] of the audit report.
Article 11 Additional report to the audit committee
1.F117,F119Statutory auditors ... carrying out statutory audits of public-interest entities shall submit an additional report to the audit committee of the [F118audited personF118] not later than the date of submission of the audit report referred to in Article 10. ...
F122If the [F120audited personF120] does not have an audit committee, the additional report shall be submitted to [F121the management body of the audited personF121] . ...
2.The additional report to the audit committee shall be in writing. It shall explain the results of the statutory audit carried out and shall at least:
(a)include the declaration of independence referred to in point (a) of Article 6(2);
(b)where the statutory audit was carried out by [F123a firmF123] , the report shall identify each key audit partner involved in the audit;
[F124 (c)where the statutory auditor has made arrangements for audit activities to be conducted by another person who is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditor and who is not a member of the same network, by a third country auditor who is not a member of the same network, or by an external expert, the report must indicate this and confirm that the statutory auditor received confirmation from the other auditor or from the external expert of their independence;F124]
(d)F126describe the nature, frequency and extent of communication with the audit committee [F125andF125] the management body ... of the [F127audited personF127] , including the dates of meetings with those bodies;
(e)include a description of the scope and timing of the audit;
(f)F129where more than one statutory auditor [F128hasF128] been appointed, describe the distribution of tasks among the statutory auditors ...;
(g)describe the methodology used, including which categories of the balance sheet have been directly verified and which categories have been verified based on system and compliance testing, including an explanation of any substantial variation in the weighting of system and compliance testing when compared to the previous year, even if the previous year's statutory audit was carried out by [F130anotherF130] statutory [F131auditorF131] ;
(h)disclose the quantitative level of materiality applied to perform the statutory audit for the [F132accountsF132] as a whole and where applicable the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and disclose the qualitative factors which were considered when setting the level of materiality;
(i)report and explain judgements about events or conditions identified in the course of the audit that may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern and whether they constitute a material uncertainty, and provide a summary of all guarantees, comfort letters, undertakings of public intervention and other support measures that have been taken into account when making a going concern assessment;
(j)report on any significant deficiencies in the [F133audited person'sF133] or, in the case of consolidated [F134accountsF134] , the parent undertaking's internal financial control system, [F135orF135] in the accounting system. For each such significant deficiency, the additional report shall state whether or not the deficiency in question has been resolved by the management;
(k)report any significant matters involving actual or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations or articles of association which were identified in the course of the audit, in so far as they are considered to be relevant in order to enable the audit committee to fulfil its tasks;
(l)report and assess the valuation methods applied to the various items in the annual or consolidated [F136accountsF136] including any impact of changes of such methods;
(m)in the case of a statutory audit of consolidated [F137accountsF137] , explain the scope of consolidation and the exclusion criteria applied by the [F138audited personF138] to the non-consolidated [F139members of the groupF139] , if any, and whether those criteria applied are in accordance with the financial reporting framework;
(n)where applicable, identify any audit work performed by [F140third country auditors or statutory auditorsF140] in relation to a statutory audit of consolidated [F141accountsF141] other than by members of the same network as [F142thatF142] to which the auditor of the consolidated [F141accountsF141] belongs;
(o)indicate whether all requested explanations and documents were provided by the [F143audited personF143] ;
(p)report:
any significant difficulties encountered in the course of the statutory audit;
any significant matters arising from the statutory audit that were discussed or were the subject of correspondence with management; and
any other matters arising from the statutory audit that in the [F144statutoryF144] auditor's professional judgement, are significant to the oversight of the financial reporting process.
F145 ...
F146 Upon request by a statutory auditor ... or the audit committee, the statutory [F147auditorF147] shall discuss key matters arising from the statutory audit, referred to in the additional report to the audit committee, and in particular in point (j) of the first subparagraph, with the audit committee, administrative body or, where applicable, supervisory body of the [F148audited personF148] .
3.Where more than one statutory auditor [F149has been appointed and aF149] disagreement has arisen between them on auditing procedures, accounting rules or any other issue regarding the conduct of the statutory audit, the [F150nature of anyF150] disagreement [F151and the reasons for it mustF151] be explained in the additional report to the audit committee.
4.The additional report to the audit committee shall be signed and dated. Where [F152a firmF152] carries out the statutory audit, the additional report to the audit committee shall be signed by the statutory auditors carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of [F153that firmF153] .
5.F155,F157Upon request, and in accordance with [F154legislation of any part of the United KingdomF154] , the statutory auditors ... shall make available without delay the additional report to the [F156competent authorityF156] ....
F158,F159Article 12 Report to supervisors of public-interest entities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 13 Transparency report
1.F160,F162,F163A statutory auditor ... that carries out [F161the statutory audit of a public interest entityF161] shall make public an annual transparency report at the latest four months after the end of each financial year. That transparency report shall be published on the website of the statutory auditor ... and shall remain available on that website for at least five years from the day of its publication on the website. ...
F164,F165A statutory auditor ... shall be allowed to update its published annual transparency report. In such a case, the statutory auditor ... shall indicate that it is an updated version of the report and the original version of the report shall continue to remain available on the website.
F166,F167Statutory auditors ... shall communicate to the competent authorities that the transparency report has been published on the website of the statutory auditor ... or, as appropriate, that it has been updated.
2.The annual transparency report shall include at least the following:
(a)a description of the legal structure and ownership of the [F168statutory auditor, if it is a firmF168] ;
(b)F169where the statutory auditor ... is a member of a network:
a description of the network and the legal and structural arrangements in the network;
[F170 the name of each member of the network that is eligible for appointment as a statutory auditor, or is eligible for appointment as an auditor in an EEA State or in Gibraltar;F170]
[F171 for each of the members of the network identified under paragraph (ii), the countries in which they are eligible for appointment as auditors or in which they have a registered office, central administration or a principal place of business;F171]
[F172 the total turnover of the members of the network identified under paragraph (ii) resulting from statutory audit work or equivalent work in the EEA States or Gibraltar;F172]
(c)a description of the governance structure of the [F173statutory auditor, if it is a firmF173] ;
(d)F174,F175a description of the internal quality control system of the statutory auditor ... and a statement by the ... management body on the effectiveness of its functioning;
(e)an indication of when the last quality assurance review referred to in Article 26 was carried out;
(f)F176a list of public-interest entities for which the statutory auditor ... carried out statutory audits during the preceding financial year;
(g)F177a statement concerning the statutory auditor's ... independence practices which also confirms that an internal review of independence compliance has been conducted;
(h)F178a statement on the policy followed by the statutory auditor ... concerning the continuing education of statutory auditors referred to in [F179paragraph 11 of Schedule 10 to the Companies Act 2006F179] ;
(i)F180information concerning the basis for the ... remuneration [F181of members of the management body of the statutory auditor, where that statutory auditor is a firmF181] ;
(j)F182a description of the statutory auditor's ... policy concerning the rotation of key audit partners and staff in accordance with Article 17(7);
(k)F184where not disclosed in its [F183accountsF183] , information about the total turnover of the statutory auditor ..., divided into the following categories:
revenues from the statutory audit of [F185accountsF185] of public-interest entities and [F186members of groupsF186] of undertakings whose parent undertaking is a public-interest entity;
revenues from the statutory audit of [F187accountsF187] of other entities;
F188 revenues from permitted non-audit services to entities that are audited by the statutory auditor ...; and
revenues from non-audit services to other entities.
F189,F189 The statutory auditor ... may, in exceptional circumstances, decide not to disclose the information required in point (f) of the first subparagraph to the extent necessary to mitigate an imminent and significant threat to the personal security of any person. The statutory auditor ... shall be able to demonstrate to the competent authority the existence of such threat.
3.F190The transparency report shall be signed by the statutory auditor ....
Article 14 Information for competent authorities
F191Statutory auditors ... shall provide annually to [F192theF192] competent authority a list of the audited public-interest entities by revenue generated from them, dividing those revenues into:
revenues from statutory audit;
revenues from non-audit services other than those referred to in Article 5(1) which are required by [F193legislation of any part of the United KingdomF193] ; and,
revenues from non-audit services other than those referred to in Article 5(1) which are not required by [F194legislation of any part of the United KingdomF194] .
F195Article 15 Record keeping
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TITLE III F196THE APPOINTMENT OF STATUTORY AUDITORS ... BY PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES
Article 16 F197Appointment of statutory auditors ...
1.F199,F201For the purposes of the application of [F198the provisionsF198] , for the appointment of statutory auditors ... by public-interest entities, the conditions set out in [F200paragraph 3F200] of this Article shall apply, ....
F204Where [F202the provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors by public interest entities do not applyF202] , the public-interest entity shall inform the competent authority of the use of [F203applicable alternative systemsF203] or modalities .... In that event, [F205paragraph 3F205] of this Article shall not apply.
F2062.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.F208[F207 TheF207] recommendation of the audit committee ... shall be prepared following a selection procedure organised by the audited entity respecting the following criteria:
[F209 (a)the audited person is free to invite any persons who are eligible for appointment as statutory auditors to submit proposals for the provision of the statutory audit on the condition that—
(i)the maximum engagement periods in the provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors by public interest entities and the restrictions on appointments in those provisions are respected; and
(ii)that the organisation of the tender process does not in any way preclude the participation in the selection procedure of firms which received less than 15 % of the total audit fees from public-interest entities concerned in the previous calendar year;F209]
(b)F212the [F210audited personF210] shall prepare tender documents for the attention of the [F211invited personsF211] . Those tender documents shall allow them to understand the business of the [F210audited personF210] and the type of statutory audit that is to be carried out. The tender documents shall contain transparent and non-discriminatory selection criteria that shall be used by the [F210audited personF210] to evaluate the proposals made by statutory auditors ...;
(c)the [F213audited personF213] shall be free to determine the selection procedure and may conduct direct negotiations with [F214applicantsF214] in the course of the procedure;
(d)where, in accordance with [F215legislation of any part of the United KingdomF215] , the [F216competent authorityF216][F217 requires statutory auditorsF217] to comply with certain quality standards, those standards shall be included in the tender documents;
(e)F220the [F218audited personF218] shall evaluate the proposals made by the [F219applicantsF219] in accordance with the selection criteria predefined in the tender documents. The [F218audited personF218] shall prepare a report on the conclusions of the selection procedure, which shall be validated by the audit committee. The [F218audited personF218] and the audit committee shall take into consideration any findings or conclusions of any inspection report on the applicant ... referred to in Article 26(8) and published by the competent authority pursuant to point (d) of Article 28;
(f)F222the [F221audited personF221] shall be able to demonstrate, upon request, to the competent authority ... that the selection procedure was conducted in a fair manner.
The audit committee shall be responsible for the selection procedure referred to in the first subparagraph.
F223,F226For the purposes of point (a) of the first subparagraph, the competent authority ... shall make public a list of the [F224personsF224] concerned [F225who are eligible for appointment as statutory auditorsF225] which shall be updated on an annual basis. The competent authority shall use the information provided by statutory auditors ... pursuant to Article 14 to make the relevant calculations.
F2274.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2275.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.F228,F229,F231Any clause of a contract entered into between a public-interest entity and a third party restricting the choice by the ... members of that entity, ... to certain categories or lists of [F230persons who are eligible for appointment as statutory auditorF230] , as regards the appointment of a particular statutory auditor ... to carry out the statutory audit of that entity shall be [F232of no effectF232] .
F234,F236The public-interest entity shall inform the [F233competent authorityF233] directly and without delay of any attempt by a third party to impose such a contractual clause or to otherwise improperly influence the decision of the ... members [F235of the public interest entityF235] on the selection of a statutory auditor ....
F2377.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2378.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 17 Duration of the audit engagement
1.F238...
Neither the initial engagement of a particular statutory auditor or audit firm, nor this in combination with any renewed engagements therewith shall exceed a maximum duration of 10 years.
F2392.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2403.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2414.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2425.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2426.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.The key audit partners responsible for carrying out a statutory audit shall cease their participation in the statutory audit of the [F243audited personF243] not later than seven years from the date of their appointment. They shall not participate again in the statutory audit of the [F243audited personF243] before three years have elapsed following that cessation.
F244...
F245,F245The statutory auditor ... shall establish an appropriate gradual rotation mechanism with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including at least the [F246individuals who are eligible for appointmentF246] as statutory auditors. The gradual rotation mechanism shall be applied in phases on the basis of individuals rather than of the entire engagement team. It shall be proportionate in view of the scale and the complexity of the activity of the statutory auditor ....
F247,F247The statutory auditor ... shall be able to demonstrate to the competent authority that such mechanism is effectively applied and adapted to the scale and the complexity of the activity of the statutory auditor ....
8.F249For the purposes of [F248the provisions for the appointment of statutory auditors by public interest entitiesF248] , the duration of the audit engagement shall be calculated as from the first financial year covered in the audit engagement letter in which the statutory auditor ... has been appointed for the first time for the carrying-out of consecutive statutory audits for the same public-interest entity.
For the purposes of this Article, [F250the statutory auditor is a firm it mustF250] include [F251any other statutory auditor that is also a firm and has been acquired by or has merged with the first statutory auditorF251] .
F252,F252If there is uncertainty as to the date on which the statutory auditor ... began carrying out consecutive statutory audits for the public-interest entity, for example due to firm mergers, acquisitions, or changes in ownership structure, the statutory auditor ... shall immediately report such uncertainties to the competent authority, which shall ultimately determine the relevant date for the purposes of the first subparagraph.
Article 18 Hand-over file cross-notes
F253...
F256,F257,F256Subject to [F254paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 to the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016F254] , [F255an outgoingF255] statutory auditor ... shall ... [F258grant anF258] incoming statutory auditor ... access to the additional reports referred to in Article 11 in respect of previous years and to any information transmitted to competent authorities pursuant to [F259Article 13, any rules made under section 340 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Communications by Auditors) Regulations 2001F259] .
F260,F260The former statutory auditor ... shall be able to demonstrate to the competent authority that such information has been provided to the incoming statutory auditor ....
F261Article 19 Dismissal and resignation of the statutory auditors or the audit firms
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TITLE IV F262SURVEILLANCE OF THE ACTIVITIES OF STATUTORY AUDITORS ... CARRYING OUT STATUTORY AUDIT OF PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES
CHAPTER I Competent authorities
F263Article 20 Designation of competent authorities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 21 Conditions of independence
F265The [F264competent authorityF264] shall be independent of statutory auditors ....
The [F266competent authorityF266] may consult experts, as referred to in point (c) of Article 26(1), for the purpose of carrying out specific tasks and may also be assisted by experts when this is essential for the proper fulfilment of their tasks. In such instances, the experts shall not be involved in any decision-making.
F267. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F269The funding of [F268the competent authorityF268] shall be secure and free from undue influence by statutory auditors ....
F270Article 22 Professional secrecy in relation to competent authorities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 23 Powers of competent authorities
[F271 1.Without prejudice to Article 26, in carrying out the competent authority's tasks, neither the competent authority nor any other regulatory authority or body [F272 of any part of the United KingdomF272] may interfere with the content of audit reports.F271]
F2732.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2733.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2734.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2735.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2736.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 24 Delegation of tasks
[F274 1.Where the competent authority delegates any of the competent authority's tasks to a recognised supervisory body under regulation 3 of the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016, this must not include tasks related to—
(a)the quality assurance system referred to in Article 26;
(b)investigations carried out under powers in the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 arising from that quality assurance system or from a referral by another authority; and
(c)the imposition of sanctions and the taking of measures under regulations 5 to 8 of the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 related to the quality assurance reviews or investigation of statutory audits of public interest entities.F274]
F2752.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F275,F2763.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F2774.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Article 25 Cooperation with other competent authorities at national level
F281[F278 The competent authorityF278] and, where appropriate, [F279any bodyF279] to whom [F280theF280] competent authority has delegated tasks shall cooperate ... with:
[F282 the body designated by the Secretary of State under section 1252 of the Companies Act 2006;F282]
[F283 the Financial Conduct Authority;F283]
[F284 the body appointed to exercise the functions mentioned at section 14(2) of the Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act 2004;
the person authorised for the purposes of section 456 of the Companies Act 2006; or
the National Crime Agency and the supervisory authorities referred to in regulation 7 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.F284]
For the purposes of such cooperation, the [F285restrictions on disclosureF285] under [F286section 1224A of the Companies Act 2006F286] shall apply.
CHAPTER II Quality assurance, market monitoring, and transparency of competent authorities
Article 26 Quality assurance
1.For the purposes of this Article:
(a) F287 ‘inspections’ means quality assurance reviews of statutory auditors ..., which are led by an inspector and which do not constitute an investigation within the meaning of [F288 regulation 3(1)(l) of the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 F288] ;
(b) ‘inspector’ means [F289 an individual F289] who meets the requirements set out in point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 5 of this Article and who is employed or otherwise contracted by a competent authority;
(c) ‘expert’ means [F290 an individual F290] who has specific expertise in financial markets, [F291 accounting F291] , auditing or other fields relevant for inspections, including practising statutory auditors.
2.The [F292competent authorityF292] shall establish an effective system of audit quality assurance.
They shall carry out quality assurance reviews of [F293individuals and firmsF293] that carry out statutory audits of public-interest entities on the basis of an analysis of the risk and:
[F294 (a)in the case of statutory auditors carrying out audits of public interest entities, other than those which, but for being public interest entities, would qualify (or would if they were companies) as small or medium-sized under sections 382 and 383 or sections 465 and 467 of the Companies Act 2006, at least every three years; andF294]
(b)in cases other than those referred to in point (a), at least every six years.
3.The competent authority shall have the following responsibilities:
(a)approval and amendment of the inspection methodologies, including inspection and follow-up manuals, reporting methodologies and periodic inspection programmes;
(b)approval and amendment of inspection reports and follow-up reports;
(c)approval and assignment of inspectors for each inspection.
The competent authority shall allocate adequate resources to the quality assurance system.
4.F295The competent authority shall organise the quality assurance system in a manner that is independent of the ... statutory auditors [F296that are the subject of the inspectionF296] .
The competent authority shall ensure that appropriate policies and procedures related to the independence and objectivity of the staff, including inspectors, and the management of the quality assurance system are put in place.
5.The competent authority shall comply with the following criteria when appointing inspectors:
(a)inspectors shall have appropriate professional education and relevant experience in statutory audit and [F297accountingF297] combined with specific training on quality assurance reviews;
(b)F298a person who is a practising statutory auditor or is employed by or otherwise associated with a statutory auditor ... shall not be allowed to act as an inspector;
(c)F299,F300,F301a person shall not be allowed to act as an inspector in an inspection of a statutory auditor ... until at least three years have elapsed since that person ceased to be a partner or employee of that statutory auditor ... or to be otherwise associated with that statutory auditor ...;
(d)F302inspectors shall declare that there are no conflicts of interest between them and the statutory auditor ... to be inspected.
By way of derogation from point (b) of paragraph 1, [F303the competent authorityF303] may contract experts for carrying out specific inspections when the number of inspectors within the authority is insufficient. The competent authority may also be assisted by experts when this is essential for the proper conduct of an inspection. In such instances, [F304the competent authorityF304] and the experts shall comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Experts shall not be involved in the governance of, or employed or otherwise contracted by professional associations and bodies but may be members of such associations or bodies.
[F305 5A. In point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph (5), “ relevant experience ” means having experience of—
(a)statutory audit work;
(b)equivalent work, for the purposes of an appointment of a person to conduct inspections made prior to IP completion day, on the audit of accounts under the law of an EEA State, or part of an EEA State, or Gibraltar; or
(c)equivalent work, for the purposes of an appointment of a person to conduct inspections, on the audit of accounts under the law of—
(i)an equivalent third country, or part of an equivalent third country; or
(ii)a transitional third country, or part of a transitional third country.F305]
6.The scope of inspections shall at least cover:
(a)F306an assessment of the design of the internal quality control system of the statutory auditor ...;
(b)adequate compliance testing of procedures and a review of audit files of public-interest entities in order to verify the effectiveness of the internal quality control system;
(c)F307in the light of the findings of the inspection under points (a) and (b) of this paragraph, an assessment of the contents of the most recent annual transparency report published by a statutory auditor ... in accordance with Article 13.
7.F308At least the following internal quality control policies and procedures of the statutory auditor ... shall be reviewed:
(a)F309,F311compliance by the statutory auditor ... with applicable auditing and quality control standards, and ethical and independence requirements, including [F310the relevant standards listed in regulation 4(2) of the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016F310] and Articles 4 and 5 of this Regulation ...;
(b)the quantity and quality of resources used, including compliance with continuing education requirements as set out in [F312paragraph 11 of Schedule 10 to the Companies Act 2006F312] ;
(c)compliance with the requirements set out in Article 4 of this Regulation on the audit fees charged.
For the purposes of testing compliance, audit files shall be selected on the basis of an analysis of the risk of a failure to carry out a statutory audit adequately.
F314[F313 The competent authorityF313] shall also periodically review the methodologies used by statutory auditors ... to carry out statutory audits.
In addition to the inspection covered by the first subparagraph, [F315the competent authorityF315] shall have the power to perform other inspections.
8.F316The findings and conclusions of inspections on which recommendations are based, including the findings and conclusions related to a transparency report, shall be communicated to and discussed with the inspected statutory auditor ... before an inspection report is finalised.
F317,F318Recommendations of inspections shall be implemented by the inspected statutory auditor ... within a reasonable period set by the competent authority. Such period shall not exceed 12 months in the case of recommendations on the internal quality control system of the statutory auditor ....
9.The inspection shall be the subject of a report which shall contain the main conclusions and recommendations of the quality assurance review.
Article 27 Monitoring market quality and competition
1.The [F319competent authorityF319] shall regularly monitor the developments in the market for providing statutory audit services to public-interest entities and shall in particular assess the following:
(a)F320the risks arising from high incidence of quality deficiencies of a statutory auditor ..., including systematic deficiencies within [F321a networkF321] , which may lead to the demise of [F322any firm in the networkF322] , the disruption in the provision of statutory audit services whether in a specific sector or across sectors, the further accumulation of risk of audit deficiencies and the impact on the overall stability of the financial sector;
(b)the market concentration levels, including in specific sectors;
(c)the performance of audit committees;
(d)the need to adopt measures to mitigate the risks referred to in point (a).
2.F325By [F32317 June 2019F323] , and at least every three years thereafter, [F324the competent authorityF324] ... shall draw up a report on developments in the market for providing statutory audit services to public-interest entities and submit it to the [F326Secretary of StateF326] .
F327...
Article 28 Transparency of [F328competent authorityF328]
[F329 The competent authorityF329] shall be transparent and shall at least publish:
annual activity reports regarding [F330the competent authority's tasksF330] ;
annual work programmes regarding [F331the competent authority's tasksF331] ;
a report on the overall results of the quality assurance system on an annual basis. This report shall include information on recommendations issued, follow-up on the recommendations, supervisory measures taken and sanctions imposed. It shall also include quantitative information and other key performance information on financial resources and staffing, and the efficiency and effectiveness of the quality assurance system;
F332 the aggregated information on the findings and conclusions of inspections referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 26(8). ...
F333CHAPTER III Cooperation between competent authorities and relations with the european supervisory authorities
F333Article 29 Obligation to cooperate
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 30 Establishment of the CEAOB
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 31 Cooperation with regard to quality assurance reviews, investigations and on-site inspections
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 32 Colleges of competent authorities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 33 Delegation of tasks
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 34 Confidentiality and professional secrecy in relation to cooperation among competent authorities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F333Article 35 Protection of personal data
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334CHAPTER IV Cooperation with third-country authorities and with international organisations and bodies
F334Article 36 Agreement on exchange of information
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 37 Disclosure of information received from third countries
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 38 Disclosure of information transferred to third countries
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 39 Exercise of the delegation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 40 Review and reports
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 41 Transitional provisions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 42 National provisions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 43 Repeal of Commission Decision 2005/909/EC
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334Article 44 Entry into force
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F334 ...
OJ C 191, 29.6.2012, p. 61.
Position of the European Parliament of 3 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 14 April 2014.
Council Directive 86/635/EEC of 8 December 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions (OJ L 372, 31.12.1986, p. 1).
Council Directive 91/674/EEC of 19 December 1991 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (OJ L 374, 31.12.1991, p. 7).
Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC (OJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p. 38).
Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ L 319, 5.12.2007, p. 1).
Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).
Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).
Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010 (OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1).
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.)
Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 1.)
Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15.)
OJ L 120, 7.5.2008, p. 20.
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48).
Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (see page 196 of this Official Journal).
OJ C 336, 6.11.2012, p. 4.
Commission Decision 2005/909/EC of 14 December 2005 setting up a group of experts to advise the Commission and to facilitate cooperation between public oversight systems for statutory auditors and audit firms (OJ L 329, 16.12.2005, p. 38.)
OJ C 191, 29.6.2012, p. 61.
Position of the European Parliament of 3 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 14 April 2014.
Council Directive 86/635/EEC of 8 December 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions (OJ L 372, 31.12.1986, p. 1).
Council Directive 91/674/EEC of 19 December 1991 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (OJ L 374, 31.12.1991, p. 7).
Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC (OJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p. 38).
Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ L 319, 5.12.2007, p. 1).
Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).
Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).
Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010 (OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1).
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.)
Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 1.)
Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15.)
OJ L 120, 7.5.2008, p. 20.
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).
European Supervisory Authority established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48).
Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (see page 196 of this Official Journal).
OJ C 336, 6.11.2012, p. 4.
Commission Decision 2005/909/EC of 14 December 2005 setting up a group of experts to advise the Commission and to facilitate cooperation between public oversight systems for statutory auditors and audit firms (OJ L 329, 16.12.2005, p. 38.)