PART 1 General

Citation, commencement and interpretation

1. —(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Restraint Orders (Legal Aid Exception and Relevant Legal Aid Payments) Regulations 2015 and, (subject to paragraphs (2) and (3)) they come into force on 1st June 2015.

(2) Regulation 5(3) and (4) comes into force on the day on which section 55 of the 2009 Act( 4 ), so far as it inserts sections 47B and 47C into the 2002 Act, comes into force.

(3) Regulation 5(7) comes into force on the day on which section 58 of the 2009 Act, so far as it inserts section 67D into the 2002 Act, comes into force.

(4) In these Regulations—

“the 2002 Act” means the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002;

“the 2009 Act” means the Policing and Crime Act 2009;

“confiscation order” means a confiscation order made under Part 2 of the 2002 Act (confiscation: England and Wales);

“legal aid exception” has the meaning given in section 41(2A) of the 2002 Act (restraint orders)( 5 );

“realisable property” has the meaning given in section 83 of the 2002 Act (realisable property);

“relevant legal aid payment” has the meaning given in section 41(2B) of the 2002 Act( 6 );

“restraint order” means a restraint order made under Part 2 of the 2002 Act.

PART 2 Legal aid exception

Prescribed restriction

2. —(1) A person specified in a restraint order may not deal with realisable property that is subject to the restraint order for the purpose of making a relevant legal aid payment unless—

(a) a confiscation order has been made against the person in proceedings for an offence to which the relevant legal aid payment relates, and

(b) the confiscation order has been discharged or satisfied.

(2) For the purposes of this regulation, a relevant legal aid payment relates to an offence if the person specified in the restraint order is obliged to make the payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the offence.

PART 3 Relevant legal aid payments: continuation of restraint

Interpretation

3. In this Part “the relevant offence” and “the specified person” have the meaning given in regulation 4.

Application of modifications of the 2002 Act in relation to restraint orders and relevant legal aid payments

4. —(1)Regulation 5 (which modifies Part 2 of the 2002 Act) has effect in relation to cases where all of the following conditions are satisfied.

(2) The first condition is that a restraint order has been made and contains a legal aid exception.

(3) The second condition is that, after that restraint order was made but before its discharge—

(a) a confiscation order was made against the person specified in the restraint order (“the specified person”), and

(b) that confiscation order has been discharged or satisfied.

(4) The third condition is that the restraint order and the confiscation order were both made in proceedings that were entirely or partly for the same offence (“the relevant offence”).

(5) The fourth condition is that, when the confiscation order was discharged or satisfied—

(a) the person specified in the restraint order was under an obligation to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence, and

(b) there was realisable property to which the restraint order applied.

(6) In regulation 5, the references to an obligation to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided in relation to the relevant offence are to any such obligation, whether it arises before or after the confiscation order was discharged or satisfied.

Modifications of the 2002 Act in relation to restraint orders and relevant legal aid payments

5. —(1) In a case where this regulation has effect, Part 2 of the 2002 Act (confiscation: England and Wales) applies with the following modifications.

(2)Section 42(6) (application, discharge and variation)( 7 ) applies as if for “on the conclusion of the proceedings or of the application (as the case may be)” there were substituted “if the specified person has satisfied his or her obligation to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence”.

(3)Section 47B (conditions for exercise of powers to seize property)( 8 ) applies as if for subsection (5) there were substituted—

“ (5) The fourth condition is that a restraint order made in connection with proceedings for an indictable offence in England and Wales is in force in respect of any realisable property. ”

(4)Section 47C(1)(a) (power to seize property)( 9 ) applies as if for the words “for satisfying any confiscation order that has been or may be made against the defendant” there were substituted “for satisfying the obligation of the specified person to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence”.

(5)Section 54 (enforcement receivers)( 10 ) applies as if—

(a) in subsection (2)(c), for “the confiscation order” there were substituted “the obligation of the specified person to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence”, and

(b) in subsection (3), for “the amount payable under the confiscation order has been fully paid” there were substituted “the obligation described in subsection (2)(c) has been satisfied”.

(6)Section 63(3)(a) (discharge and variation of orders relating to management receivers)( 11 ) applies as if for “on the conclusion of the proceedings or of the application (as the case may be)” there were substituted “if the specified person has satisfied his or her obligation to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence”.

(7)Section 67D (proceeds of realisation)( 12 ) applies as if—

(a) in subsection (2)(c), for “the amount payable under the confiscation order” there were substituted “the obligation of the specified person to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided in relation to the relevant offence”, and

(b) in subsection (3), for “the amount payable under the confiscation order has been fully paid” there were substituted “the obligation described in subsection (2)(c) has been satisfied”.

(8) In section 69(2) (powers of court and receiver)( 13 ), each of paragraphs (a) and (c) apply as if for the words from “any confiscation order that has been or may be made against the defendant” there were substituted “any obligation of the specified person to make a relevant legal aid payment in connection with services provided entirely or partly in relation to the relevant offence”.