Statutory Instruments
2024 No. 514
Investigatory Powers
The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (Remedial) Order 2024
Made
15th April 2024
Coming into force
16th April 2024
It appears to the Secretary of State, following a finding of the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against the United Kingdom( 1 ), that section 154 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016( 2 ) is incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention( 3 ).
The Secretary of State considers that there are compelling reasons for proceeding by way of a remedial order( 4 ) to make such amendments to section 154 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 as the Secretary of State considers necessary to remove the incompatibility.
In accordance with paragraph 2(a) of Schedule 2 to the Human Rights Act 1998( 5 ), a draft of this instrument was laid before Parliament and was approved by resolution of each House of Parliament, a document containing a draft of this instrument having previously been laid before Parliament in accordance with paragraph 3(1) of that Schedule.
Accordingly, the Secretary of State makes this Order, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10(2) of, and paragraph 1(1)(a), (2)(a) and (3) of Schedule 2 to, the Human Rights Act 1998.
Citation, commencement and extent
1. —(1) This Order may be cited as the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (Remedial) Order 2024 and comes into force on the day after the day on which it is made.
(2) This Order extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Substitution of section 154 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016
2. For section 154 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, substitute—
“ 154 Additional safeguards for confidential journalistic material etc
(1) Subsection (2) applies if, in a case where intercepted content or secondary data obtained under a bulk interception warrant is to be selected for examination—
(a) the purpose, or one of the purposes, of using those criteria to be used for the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination (“the relevant criteria”) is to identify any confidential journalistic material or to identify or confirm a source of journalistic information, or
(b) the use of the relevant criteria is highly likely to identify such material or identify or confirm such a source.
(2) The intercepted content or secondary data may be selected for examination using the relevant criteria only if the use of those criteria has been approved by—
(a) the Investigatory Powers Commissioner; or
(b) in a case where a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State considers there is an urgent need to do so, the senior official.
(3) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner or a senior official may give an approval under subsection (2) only if the Commissioner or official considers that—
(a) the public interest in obtaining the information that would be obtained by the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information, and
(b) there are no less intrusive means by which the information may reasonably be obtained.
(4) Subsection (5) applies where—
(a) intercepted content or secondary data obtained under a bulk interception warrant (“the relevant material”) is retained, following its examination, for purposes other than the destruction of the relevant material, and
(b) the person to whom the warrant is addressed considers that the relevant material contains confidential journalistic material or material that would identify or confirm a source of journalistic information.
(5) The person to whom the warrant is addressed must inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner of the retention of the relevant material as soon as reasonably practicable.
(6) Unless the Investigatory Powers Commissioner considers that subsection (8) applies to the relevant material, the Commissioner must direct that the relevant material is destroyed.
(7) If the Investigatory Powers Commissioner considers that subsection (8) applies to the relevant material, the Commissioner may impose such conditions as to the use or retention of the relevant material as the Commissioner considers necessary for the purpose of protecting the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information.
(8) This subsection applies to material containing—
(a) confidential journalistic material, or
(b) material identifying or confirming a source of journalistic information,
if the public interest in retaining the material outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information.
(9) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner—
(a) may require an affected party to make representations about how the Commissioner should exercise any function under subsections (6) and (7), and
(b) must have regard to any such representations made by an affected party (whether or not as a result of a requirement imposed under paragraph (a)).
(10) “ Affected party ” has the meaning given by section 153(14).
(For provision about the grounds for retaining material obtained under a warrant, see section 150.)
154A Section 154: procedure where use of criteria approved by senior official
(1) This section applies where intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination using criteria the use of which was approved by a senior official under section 154(2).
(2) The Secretary of State must, as soon as reasonably practicable, inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner that the approval has been given.
(3) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner must, as soon as reasonably practicable—
(a) consider whether the relevant condition is met as regards the use of the criteria for the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination, and
(b) notify the Secretary of State of their decision.
(4) For this purpose, “the relevant condition” is that—
(a) the public interest in obtaining the information that would be obtained by the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of confidential journalistic material or sources of journalistic information, and
(b) there are no less intrusive means by which the information may reasonably be obtained.
(5) On the giving of a notification of a decision that the relevant condition is not met, the senior official’s approval ceases to have effect.
(6) Nothing in subsection (5) affects the lawfulness of—
(a) anything done by virtue of the approval before it ceases to have effect, or
(b) if anything is in the process of being done by virtue of the approval when it ceases to have effect—
(i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
(ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop. ” .
Amendment to section 229 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016
3. —(1) Section 229( 6 ) of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is amended as follows.
(2) After subsection (8)(f), insert—
“ (fa) deciding whether—
(i) to approve the use of criteria under section 154(2)(a),
(ii) subsection 154(8) applies for the purposes of subsection 154(6) and (7),
(iii) the relevant condition is met for the purposes of subsection 154A(3)(a). ” .
Tom Tugendhat
Minister of State
Home Office
15th April 2024
Big Brother Watch and Others v the United Kingdom (application numbers 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) 25th May 2021.
See section 21(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (c.42) for the meaning of “the Convention”.
See section 21(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the definition of “remedial order”.
1998 c. 42 . There are amendments to Schedule 2, none of which are relevant to this Order.
Section 229 was amended by section 7(1) and (2) of the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021 (c. 4) ; S.I. 2018/1123 and by S.I. 2020/1009 .