Pervaiz v Chelsea Building Society

[2001] EWCA Civ 767

Case details

Case citations
[2001] EWCA Civ 767
Court
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment date
1 May 2001
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Civil procedure Appellate jurisdiction Permission to appeal
Keywords
refusal of permission to appeal no appeal against refusal of permission Court of Appeal jurisdiction stay of execution application to set aside
Outcome
application refused for want of jurisdiction
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

There is no appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal. The Court of Appeal therefore has no jurisdiction to entertain an application framed as an application to set aside an order refusing permission to appeal.

Factual background

The applicant applied for permission to appeal and a stay of execution, presenting the application as one to set aside an order made by Mr Justice Rougier on 7 March 2001. That order had refused permission to appeal against orders made by Master Trench on 4 October 2000. The central issue was whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to entertain the application.

Held

  1. Application refused. The application was, in substance, an attempt to challenge Mr Justice Rougier’s refusal of permission to appeal.
  2. Lord Justice Latham held that there is no appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction to deal with the application before it.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

  1. Court of Appeal (Civil Division): The application to set aside the order of Mr Justice Rougier dated 7 March 2001, together with the application for permission to appeal and a stay of execution, was refused for want of jurisdiction.
  2. High Court: Mr Justice Rougier refused permission to appeal against orders made by Master Trench on 4 October 2000.
  3. Master Trench: Orders were made on 4 October 2000.

Lower court decision

Judgment appealed:
Not stated in the judgment
Outcome:
application refused for want of jurisdiction

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.