Burlo v Langley & Anor

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the Employment Appeal Tribunal and upheld the EAT’s decision and order. The supplied judgment text records the formal disposition and costs order but does not reproduce the reasons or identify any substantive legal principle. No extractable ratio beyond the formal orders can therefore be stated.

Burlo v Langley & Anor was an appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) from the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The EAT decision and order dated 6 March 2006 were under challenge. The supplied text does not state the underlying facts, grounds of appeal or central legal issues.

1. The appeal was dismissed. The decision and order of the Employment Appeal Tribunal dated 6 March 2006 were upheld.
2. By agreement, there was no order as to costs, save for CLS assessment of the appellant’s costs.
3. The appellant was given until 4 pm on 11 January 2007 to lodge a written application for permission to appeal to the House of Lords. The respondent was given until 4 pm on 15 January 2007 to respond.

The supplied text records the formal order only and does not contain the reasons referred to by the court.

1. Employment Appeal Tribunal: decision and order dated 6 March 2006.
2. Court of Appeal (Civil Division): appeal dismissed and the EAT decision and order upheld.