Nursing and Midwifery Council v Oyenuga

[2012] EWHC 2444 (Admin)

Case details

Case citations
[2012] EWHC 2444 (Admin)
Court
High Court (Administrative Court)
Judgment date
15 August 2012
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Administrative law Professional discipline Interim suspension orders
Keywords
Nursing regulation Interim suspension Public protection Public interest Conduct and Competence Committee Sanction hearing Professional misconduct
Outcome
application granted
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

Under article 31(8) of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001, an interim suspension order may be extended where this is necessary to protect the public or otherwise in the public interest. Serious charges having been proved, and the sanction hearing remaining outstanding, continuation of the suspension may be appropriate to allow that hearing to take place and to protect the public in the meantime.

Factual background

The Nursing and Midwifery Council applied for a further four-month extension of an interim suspension order made against the defendant on 23 February 2011. The Conduct and Competence Committee had found all outstanding charges proved after a three-day hearing, but had been unable to determine sanction. The defendant had notice of the application but did not respond or appear. The central issue was whether the suspension should continue pending the sanction hearing.

Held

  1. The application was granted. The interim suspension order was extended for a further four months under article 31(8) of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001.
  2. The Conduct and Competence Committee had found all the charges proved. The charges were serious and concerned a wide range of nursing practice.
  3. The outstanding sanction hearing was expected to take place in September or November. Extension of the order was therefore required to preserve public protection until the Committee determined the appropriate sanction.
  4. The court was satisfied, having considered the papers, that continuation of the order was appropriate for the protection of the public and otherwise in the public interest.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

The judgment describes an earlier interim suspension order made on 23 February 2011 and subsequent reviews, including a review in April 2012. The application for a further extension was determined by the High Court (Administrative Court).

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.