Nursing and Midwidfery Council, R (on the application of) v Boulton

[2012] EWHC 2598 (Admin)

Case details

Case citations
[2012] EWHC 2598 (Admin)
Court
High Court (Administrative Court)
Judgment date
20 July 2012
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Administrative Professional regulation Interim protective orders
Keywords
Nursing and Midwifery Council interim suspension order article 31.8 protection of the public public interest fitness to practise
Outcome
application granted (interim suspension order extended)
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

An interim suspension order may be extended where the court is satisfied that the extension is necessary for the protection of the public and is otherwise in the public interest. An extension may be granted for a further defined period, subject to the statutory framework governing the order.

Factual background

The Nursing and Midwifery Council applied to extend an interim suspension order made on 26 July 2010 under article 31.8 of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001. The defendant did not appear. The application sought a further six-month period from 24 July 2012.

Held

  1. The application to extend the interim suspension order was granted.
  2. Under article 31.8 of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001, the relevant question was whether continuation of the order was necessary for the protection of the public and otherwise in the public interest.
  3. Having considered the supporting witness statement and the claimant’s submissions, the court was entirely satisfied that the extension was necessary for those purposes.
  4. The suspension order was extended for six months, until 23 January 2013.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

This was a first-instance application. The judgment records that an interim order had previously been made on 26 July 2010.

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.