Gorjacko, R (on the application of) v Public Prosecutor of Latvia

[2012] EWHC 3030 (Admin)

Case details

Case citations
[2012] EWHC 3030 (Admin)
Court
High Court (Administrative Court)
Judgment date
5 October 2012
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Administrative Civil procedure
Keywords
withdrawn appeal consent order formal dismissal Assange point
Outcome
appeal dismissed (withdrawn)
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

An appeal which has been withdrawn pursuant to a consent order should be formally dismissed by the court.

Factual background

The claimant brought an appeal concerning the point arising from Assange. The court recorded that the point had been decided against the appellant. A consent order made clear that the appeal had been withdrawn. The court therefore proceeded to determine the formal disposition of the appeal.

Held

  1. The court stated that the appeal raised the Assange point, which had already been decided against the appellant.
  2. The court found no substance in the matter before it.
  3. A consent order clearly established that the appeal had been withdrawn. Mr Justice Collins therefore formally dismissed the appeal.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

The judgment records that the appeal had been withdrawn by consent. No citation for the decision under appeal is stated.

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.