Afshin Sajedi & Ors The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] UKUT 102 (TCC)

Case details

Case citations
[2026] UKUT 102 (TCC)
Court
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Judgment date
29 January 2026
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Tax Stamp Duty Land Tax Appeals from tribunals
Keywords
Stamp Duty Land Tax SDLT overpayment relief closure notices material error of law consent order Upper Tribunal appeal costs
Outcome
appeal allowed; ftt decision set aside and remade; sdlt overpayment relief allowed
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

An appeal may be disposed of by consent order without a hearing where the parties agree the outcome and the Upper Tribunal considers that disposal appropriate, just and fair under the overriding objective. The Upper Tribunal may set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision for material error of law and remake the decision. Where the remade decision allows claims for SDLT overpayment relief, the appellants are entitled to that relief as claimed.

Factual background

The appellants appealed to the Upper Tribunal from a decision of the First-tier Tribunal released on 5 March 2025, reported as [2025] UKFTT 297 (TC). Permission to appeal had been granted in September 2025.

The appeal concerned claims for overpayment relief in respect of Stamp Duty Land Tax. The parties agreed that the appeal should be determined without a hearing by consent order and without reasons under rule 40(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008. The central issue was whether the FTT decision should be set aside for material error of law and the appellants’ claims allowed.

Held

  1. The appeal was allowed by consent and without a hearing. The Upper Tribunal considered that disposal by consent order was appropriate, just and fair in accordance with the overriding objective.
  2. The FTT decision released on 5 March 2025, [2025] UKFTT 297 (TC), was set aside for material error of law.
  3. The Upper Tribunal remade the FTT decision. The appellants’ appeals against HMRC’s closure notices refusing their claims for SDLT overpayment relief were allowed.
  4. The appellants were entitled to overpayment relief in respect of SDLT as claimed.
  5. HMRC was ordered to pay the appellants’ reasonable costs of the Upper Tribunal proceedings, including the costs of preparing the application for permission to appeal.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

  • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber): The appeal was allowed by consent. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal was set aside for material error of law and remade.
  • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber): Decision released on 5 March 2025, [2025] UKFTT 297 (TC).

Lower court decision

Judgment appealed:
[2025] UKFTT 297 (TC)
Outcome:
appeal allowed; ftt decision set aside and remade; sdlt overpayment relief allowed

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.