| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Dec 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4019 (IPEC)
In an inquiry into damages for infringement of registered and unregistered design rights, loss must be caused by the infringement. A claimant seeking lost…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4034 (IPEC)
UK unregistered design right may protect a specifically identified design embodied in the whole or part of an article. A pleading that lists significant…
|
5 |
| 21 Nov 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3779 (IPEC)
Copyright infringement in a design requires proof of copying and copying of the whole work or a substantial part. Similarities may support a prima facie…
|
2 |
| 17 Nov 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3762 (IPEC)
Copyright infringement may occur where a website is targeted at the UK, even though it is also targeted at another country. Targeting is a multi-factorial…
|
8 |
| 5 Nov 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3572 (IPEC)
User-principle damages are compensatory. The court assesses the sum that reasonable parties would have negotiated for permission to carry out the infringing…
|
2 |
| 3 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3087 (IPEC)
Damages for infringement of intellectual property rights remain compensatory. A claimant may recover the reasonable royalty that would have been agreed for a…
|
13 |
| 19 Sep 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2999 (IPEC)
A descriptive educational name may support passing off only if it has acquired a secondary meaning identifying the claimant’s services to the relevant public.…
|
4 |
| 4 Sep 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2924 (IPEC)
In an account of profits for patent infringement, the defendant is accountable only for profits legally caused by the infringement. The court must assess the…
|
4 |
| 22 Aug 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2845 (IPEC)
Patent claims must be construed by giving effect to their language and limitations. The word “toy” limited the claims to products of a scale that a child might…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2625 (IPEC)
In an account of profits for unregistered design-right infringement, the court may adopt a broad-brush assessment where the evidence does not permit precise…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2836 (IPEC)
In an inquiry as to damages, the claimant must prove loss, but damages may be assessed broadly where exact quantification is impossible. The court must…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3019 (IPEC)
Failure to comply with directions for costs submissions or election of an inquiry may justify striking out the outstanding claim where the breach is serious…
|
|
| 7 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2221 (IPEC)
Where parties settle pleaded trade mark infringement proceedings, the settlement generally concludes claims falling within the pleaded case. It does not…
|
1 |
| 3 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2084 (IPEC)
In an inquiry into damages for groundless patent threats, compensation is assessed to place the claimant in the position it would have occupied absent the…
|
5 |
| 18 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1970 (IPEC)
An implied contractual term must reflect what the agreement, read objectively and in context, would reasonably be understood to mean. The court must adopt a…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1931 (IPEC)
In an inquiry into damages for infringement of unregistered design right, recovery is not limited to losses relating to products protected by the infringed…
|
3 |
| 9 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1874 (IPEC)
Under the Brussels I Regulation, jurisdiction over a cross-border dispute is distinct from the internal allocation of proceedings between domestic tribunals. A…
|
|
| 2 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2077 (IPEC)
On a summary-judgment application, the court must decide whether the defence has a realistic prospect of success, without conducting a mini-trial. The court…
|
1 |
| 29 May 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1686 (IPEC)
Passing off requires the classic trinity of goodwill, a material misrepresentation and damage. Misrepresentation means an assumption by the relevant public of…
|
7 |
| 27 May 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2135 (IPEC)
Relief from a judgment in default requires a defendant to satisfy the conditions in Civil Procedure Rules 1998, CPR 13.3. The defendant must show a real…
|
|
| 16 May 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC)
For invalidity under art 3(1)(c) of the Trade Mark Directive, the question is whether the average consumer would immediately perceive the sign, without further…
|
|
| 1 May 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1306 (IPEC)
For inventive step, the skilled person may differ according to the task being performed. Obviousness through the eyes of either a person drawn from the prior…
|
1 |
| 10 Apr 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1117 (IPEC)
In an issue-based costs assessment, the overall winner is ordinarily entitled to its general costs, subject to adjustment for issues on which it lost. Any…
|
|
| 2 Apr 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 979 (IPEC)
In the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, the transitional costs regime applies by reference to the claim form commencing the relevant claim. An…
|
3 |
| 18 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 670 (IPEC)
Liability for infringement or passing off is not established merely because a publisher or website provider uses a claimant’s mark in advertising a defendant’s…
|
2 |
| 12 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 610 (IPEC)
A claim may be an abuse of process where the maximum recoverable benefit is plainly disproportionate to the court resources required to determine it. There is…
|
2 |
| 6 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 475 (IPEC)
A communication constitutes a threat of patent infringement proceedings where a reasonable recipient, considering the communication as a whole and the relevant…
|
1 |
| 28 Feb 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 431 (IPEC)
Service at an individual’s last known residence may be effective even without actual receipt. The relevant knowledge is actual or constructive knowledge…
|
2 |
| 17 Feb 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 349 (IPEC)
In the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, the disclosure-report provisions in CPR rule 31.5 do not apply. Although IPEC claims are generally multi-track…
|
|
| 3 Feb 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 99 (IPEC)
A de facto directorship is determined by considering all relevant circumstances. There is no single decisive test. Important factors include whether the…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2013 |
[2014] EWHC 26 (IPEC)
In the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, costs must reflect both the successful party’s entitlement to recover reasonable costs and the objective of…
|