| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jan 2010 |
[2009] EWHC 3482 (Pat)
Patent claims are construed as the skilled person would understand them. Specific embodiments do not ordinarily add limitations omitted from general claim…
|
13 |
| 25 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2992 (Pat)
On a summary judgment application, a claim has a realistic prospect of success only where it carries some degree of conviction. The court must avoid a…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2952 (Pat)
For obviousness, the question is whether the claimed invention, considered as claimed, would have been obvious to the skilled person. A product or formulation…
|
7 |
| 3 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2691 (Pat)
A patent claim must be construed through the eyes of the skilled person, without importing limitations from a preferred embodiment or the drawings. For an…
|
1 |
| 29 Oct 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2690 (Pat)
Patent claims are construed by asking what the skilled person would understand the patentee to mean in context. Where a two-part claim is expressly based on…
|
1 |
| 17 Sep 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2361 (Pat)
An indemnity in an intellectual property licence agreement may protect a licensee against third-party claims that exploitation of the licensed rights infringes…
|
1 |
| 28 Aug 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2204 (Pat)
For anticipation, the prior art must clearly describe, or clearly instruct the skilled person to make, something that would necessarily infringe, and must be…
|
1 |
| 31 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1938 (Pat)
A patent claim term should ordinarily have a consistent meaning across the claims. A skilled person may understand a claimed device to include a combination of…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1929 (Pat)
Patent claims directed to applying glue to a roll by rolling the roll over a slit require the rolling movement to play an active part in picking up the glue. A…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1916 (Pat)
For Article 3(a) of the Council Regulation 1768/92/EEC, the relevant question is which active ingredients of a combination product are protected by the claims…
|
3 |
| 29 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2029 (Pat)
Costs in patent litigation are governed by the general discretion under CPR 44.3. The unsuccessful party will usually pay the successful party’s general costs…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1829 (Pat)
A product claim using “for” may be construed as requiring suitability for the stated purpose. The product must be capable of producing a real beneficial effect…
|
5 |
| 10 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1671 (Pat)
A patent claim defined by functional results must be enabled across its full scope. It is insufficient to identify desirable parameters if the skilled person…
|
5 |
| 7 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1588 (Pat)
Patent claims are construed purposively through the eyes of the skilled addressee, but deliberate claim limitations remain significant and there is no general…
|
3 |
| 16 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1312 (Pat)
A patent claim directed to the use of an impurity to control crystal habit is construed according to its substance. “Control” may include monitoring, checking…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1294 (Pat)
A product claim using the word “for” ordinarily claims a product suitable for the stated purpose, rather than a product actually intended for that purpose. A…
|
4 |
| 12 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1443 (Pat)
In exercising its discretion as to costs, the court must consider all the circumstances, including party conduct, success on individual issues and…
|
|
| 12 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1304 (Pat)
Patent claims must be construed as the skilled person would understand the patentee’s language in context. A stent is radially expandable if it can be…
|
5 |
| 9 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1221 (Pat)
Patent claims must be construed purposively, by reading the claims in the context of the specification and asking what the skilled person would understand the…
|
8 |
| 20 May 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1160 (Pat)
A properly constituted and arguable patent revocation claim is not an abuse merely because the claimant lacks a commercial interest or has been offered a…
|
6 |
| 15 May 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)
Anticipation by inevitable result requires proof that every relevant way of carrying out the prior-art teaching would produce the patented subject matter. A…
|
2 |
| 14 May 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1302 (Pat)
Where an earlier judgment has held patent claims excluded because they concern computer implementation, amended dependent claims remain caught by that decision…
|
|
| 13 May 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1213 (Pat)
A preliminary issue should be ordered only where it is likely to dispose of the proceedings or a substantial aspect of them, materially reduce costs or trial…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 931 (Pat)
The discretion to stay national patent proceedings because parallel EPO or foreign proceedings are pending is wide and must secure the balance of justice in…
|
|
| 2 Apr 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 656 (Pat)
The court referred questions concerning the interpretation of the supplementary protection certificate regime to the Court of Justice. Its provisional view was…
|
1 |
| 27 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 631 (Pat)
In assessing obviousness, the court must identify the skilled person, the relevant common general knowledge, the inventive concept and the differences from the…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 418 (Pat)
For an infringement claim under section 60(1)(b) of the Patents Act 1977, offering a device with user-settable parameters can amount to offering a range of…
|
|
| 3 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 343 (Pat)
The Aerotel four-stage approach remains the governing framework for computer-program and business-method exclusions, although it should not be applied…
|
9 |
| 3 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 336 (Pat)
Patent claims must be construed from the perspective of the skilled person, having regard to the technical purpose of the claimed elements. A microemulsion…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 213 (Pat)
A patent claim for a fentanyl patch is construed through the eyes of the skilled person and given a practical meaning. A monolithic patch has one functional…
|
1 |
| 11 Feb 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 181 (Pat)
Under section 40(1) of the Patents Act 1977, an employee inventor may obtain compensation where the employer owns the patented invention, the patent has been…
|
7 |
| 30 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 59 (Pat)
Restoration of a lapsed patent under section 28(3) of the Patents Act 1977 requires the proprietor to show that it took reasonable care to secure payment of…
|
1 |
| 23 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 131 (Pat)
Case management must balance overlapping issues and the risk of inconsistent evidence against proportionality, equality of arms and the efficient use of…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 102 (Pat)
A patent specification must identify the technical benefit said to support the invention. A general assertion of an unexpectedly beneficial therapeutic effect…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 55 (Pat)
For novelty, prior art must disclose subject matter which would necessarily infringe the claim and must disclose it sufficiently to enable the skilled person…
|
3 |
| 21 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 26 (Pat)
Unregistered design right protects copying of an embodied design, not an abstract concept or general design idea. Similarity may support an inference of…
|
9 |
| 13 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 45 (Pat)
On an application for an interim patent injunction, the court must assess whether there is a serious issue to be tried and then consider the adequacy of…
|
1 |
| 9 Jan 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 6 (Pat)
A patent specification need enable the skilled person to construct the claimed device, but need not provide a complete clinical manual for using it. A claim…
|
2 |