(1)A limited company must not acquire its own shares, whether by purchase, subscription or otherwise, except in accordance with the provisions of this Part.
(2)If a company purports to act in contravention of this section—
(a)an offence is committed by—
(i)the company, and
(ii)every officer of the company who is in default, and
(b)the purported acquisition is void.
(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine (or both);
(b)on summary conviction—
(i)in England and Wales, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or both);
(ii)in Scotland or Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or both).
Cases considering section 658 (3)
[2019] EWHC 311 (Ch) · 27 February 2019
Applies section 658(2)(b) in finding that the proposed company purchase of Cotton’s shares was void for non-compliance. The court nevertheless granted equitable relief based on estoppel between the relevant parties. (see paras [58], [74])
[2018] EWHC 1203 (QB) · 18 May 2018Interprets
Section 658(1) prohibits a limited company acquiring its own shares except in accordance with Part 18 and makes a purported acquisition void. The ISA contemplated such an acquisition, but the prohibition applied only to performance funded by the Company; lawful performance by Raghbir remained available. (see paras [216]; [224]-[226]; [232])
[2019] EWCA Civ 2146 · 3 December 2019
Applies the general prohibition on a company acquiring its own shares except in accordance with Part 18, providing the statutory setting for the voidness consequence. (see para [50])
Confirms that a limited company must not acquire its own shares except in accordance with Part 18. The provision frames the statutory invalidity of a non-compliant acquisition. (see para [50])
Confirms that a purported acquisition in contravention of the statutory prohibition is void. The Court applied the related payment requirement in section 691 to the buy-back. (see paras [50]; [60])
What each judgment says about section 658 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.