(1)The court may, on an application under this subsection, order a meeting of the creditors or class of creditors, or of the members of the company or class of members (as the case may be), to be summoned in such manner as the court directs.
(2)An application under subsection (1) may be made by—
(a)the company,
(b)any creditor or member of the company,
(c)if the company is being wound up, the liquidator, or
(d)if the company is in administration, the administrator.
(3)Every creditor or member of the company whose rights are affected by the compromise or arrangement must be permitted to participate in a meeting ordered to be summoned under subsection (1).
(4)But subsection (3) does not apply in relation to a class of creditors or members of the company if, on an application under this subsection, the court is satisfied that none of the members of that class has a genuine economic interest in the company.
(5)An application under subsection (4) is to be made by the person who made the application under subsection (1) in respect of the compromise or arrangement.
(6)Section 323 (representation of corporations at meetings) applies to a meeting of creditors under this section as to a meeting of the company (references to a member of the company being read as references to a creditor).
(7)This section is subject to section 901H (moratorium debts, etc).
Cases considering section 901C (51)
[2025] EWCA Civ 475 · 15 April 2025Interprets
The provision empowers the court to summon creditor or member meetings in the manner it considers appropriate. (see paras [29]–[30])
The provision removes the voting veto of a class having no genuine economic interest. That does not create a rigid rule excluding its treatment from the discretionary assessment of fair allocation. The meaning of economic interest for this purpose was left open. (see paras [131]–[156])
[2024] EWCA Civ 24 · 23 January 2024Interprets
Excluding economically uninterested classes from voting removes their veto. Provisionally, that procedural power supplies no authority for uncompensated extinction of their rights; the economic assessment rests on probabilistic valuation evidence. (see paras [251]; [275]–[276])
A class may be excluded from voting where none of its members has a genuine economic interest. This removes a potential veto; it does not establish a power to confiscate rights without consideration. (see paras [8]; [251]; [275])
[2026] EWHC 1438 (Ch) · 12 June 2026Interprets
The court treated a meeting summoned under section 901C as sufficient for section 901G purposes, even where attendance did not satisfy a more restrictive judicial conception of a meeting. (see paras [96]-[97], [101]-[104])
- Argo Blockchain plc, Re[2025] EWHC 3395 (Ch) · 23 December 2025
- Argo Blockchain Plc, Re[2025] EWHC 2951 (Ch) · 6 November 2025
- Poundland Limited, Re[2025] EWHC 1822 (Ch) · 8 July 2025
- Madagascar Oil Limited, Re[2025] EWHC 1015 (Ch) · 28 April 2025
- Petrofac Limited & Anor, Re[2025] EWHC 859 (Ch) · 20 March 2025
- Enzen Global Limited & Anor, Re[2025] EWHC 684 (Ch) · 26 February 2025
- OutsideClinic Ltd (The Companies Act 2006), Re[2025] EWHC 1560 (Ch) · 24 February 2025
- Ambatovy Minerals Societe Anonyme & Anor, Re[2025] EWHC 279 (Ch) · 11 February 2025
- Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited, Re[2025] EWHC 205 (Ch) · 3 February 2025
- Revolution Bars Limited, Re[2024] EWHC 2949 (Ch) · 8 August 2024
- Consort Healthcare (Tameside) Plc, Re[2024] EWHC 1438 (Ch) · 20 May 2024
- Project Lietzenburger Straße Holdco SARL, Re[2024] EWHC 563 (Ch) · 7 March 2024
- Project Lietzenburger Straße Holdco SARL, Re[2024] EWHC 468 (Ch) · 4 March 2024
- Project Lietzenburger Strasse HoldCo SARL, Re[2023] EWHC 2849 (Ch) · 1 November 2023
- Atento UK Limited & Anor, Re[2023] EWHC 2754 (Ch) · 20 October 2023
- Galapagos Bidco S.A.R.L v Dr Frank Kebekus & Ors[2023] EWHC 1931 (Ch) · 28 July 2023
- In The Matter Of Cimolai SPA[2023] EWHC 1819 (Ch) · 14 July 2023
31 more judgments, and what each says about section 901C, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.