(1)A member of a company may apply to the court by petition for an order under this Part on the ground—
(a)that the company's affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members generally or of some part of its members (including at least himself), or
(b)that an actual or proposed act or omission of the company (including an act or omission on its behalf) is or would be so prejudicial.
(1A)For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), a removal of the company's auditor from office—
(a)on grounds of divergence of opinions on accounting treatments or audit procedures, or
(b)on any other improper grounds,
shall be treated as being unfairly prejudicial to the interests of some part of the company's members.
(2)The provisions of this Part apply to a person who is not a member of a company but to whom shares in the company have been transferred or transmitted by operation of law as they apply to a member of a company.
(3) In this section, and so far as applicable for the purposes of this section in the other provisions of this Part, “company” means—
(a)a company within the meaning of this Act, or
(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cases considering section 994 (346)
[2026] UKSC 6 · 25 February 2026Interprets
Creates a petitioning jurisdiction responding to a state of affairs that is unfairly prejudicial. It does not create or enforce a substantive obligation and is not subject to sections 8 or 9 of the Limitation Act 1980. Delay may nevertheless affect relief (see paras [116]-[117]; [155]-[158]; [170]-[172]).
The subsection permits a member to petition where company affairs, or an actual or proposed company act or omission, are unfairly prejudicial. It creates access to a discretionary remedy rather than a substantive statutory obligation (see paras [10]; [116]).
[2023] UKPC 33 · 20 September 2023
Confirms, by comparison with Cayman law, that an inter partes share-purchase remedy for unfairly prejudicial conduct may be granted by an arbitral tribunal where the tribunal has jurisdiction and third-party interests are not engaged. (see paras [15]; [33]; [76])
[2026] EWCA Civ 719 · 9 June 2026
The judgment applies section 994 by requiring unfair prejudice to the Petitioners in their capacity as members. Financial prejudice depends on whether the alleged wrongdoing would have given value to their shares, subject to broader forms of prejudice. (see paras [2]; [58]-[61]; [116]-[120])
326 more judgments, and what each says about section 994, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.