(1) In this Part a “work of joint authorship” means a work produced by the collaboration of two or more authors in which the contribution of each author is not distinct from that of the other author or authors.
( 1A )A film shall be treated as a work of joint authorship unless the producer and the principal director are the same person.
(2)A broadcast shall be treated as a work of joint authorship in any case where more than one person is to be taken as making the broadcast (see section 6(3)).
(3)References in this Part to the author of a work shall, except as otherwise provided, be construed in relation to a work of joint authorship as references to all the authors of the work.
Cases considering section 10 14
[2019] EWCA Civ 1645 · 9 October 2019Interprets
Joint authorship requires collaboration, authorship, sufficient authorial contribution and non-distinct contributions. Creative contributions extend beyond writing, and neither subjective joint intention nor equal control is required. Earlier collaboration does not itself establish authorship of a later draft analysed as a separate derivative work. (see paras [30]-[31]; [53]; [80]-[82])
Read with the statutory definition of author, references to the author of a jointly authored work encompass all its creators. This supports identifying joint authorship by the contributions to creation rather than by who performed the writing. (see para [36])
[2025] EWHC 3317 (IPEC) · 17 December 2025
Applies the definition of joint authorship requiring collaboration by two or more authors whose contributions are not distinct. The claimant failed to prove the required authorial contribution (see paras [30], [33]-[34], [79]-[91]).
[2025] EWHC 3381 (Comm) · 11 December 2025
The proposed pleading relied on joint authorship under s 10. The court treated the ownership and authorship issues as matters for trial rather than summary determination (see paras [183]-[189]).
What each judgment says about section 10 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.