(1)If while a licensing scheme is in operation a dispute arises between the operator of the scheme and—
(a)a person claiming that he requires a licence in a case of a description to which the scheme applies, or
(b)an organisation claiming to be representative of such persons,
that person or organisation may refer the scheme to the Copyright Tribunal in so far as it relates to cases of that description.
(2)A scheme which has been referred to the Tribunal under this section shall remain in operation until proceedings on the reference are concluded.
(3)The Tribunal shall consider the matter in dispute and make such order, either confirming or varying the scheme so far as it relates to cases of the description to which the reference relates, as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
(4)The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
Cases considering section 119 4
[2014] EWHC 1398 (Ch) · 5 March 2014
The judgment referred to section 119 as an example of the Copyright Tribunal’s jurisdiction to confirm or vary licensing schemes. The provision formed part of the statutory context for the Tribunal applications. (see para [17])
[2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch) · 26 November 2010
Permits a potential licensee to refer licensing-scheme terms to the Copyright Tribunal for determination of reasonableness. The judgment does not finally construe the scheme’s terms. (see paras [11]-[16])
Was relied on in argument concerning whether the licensing scheme remained operative during the Tribunal reference. The court did not decide that issue. (see para [47])
[2008] EWHC 2715 (Ch) · 21 November 2008
The provision is considered as part of the statutory mechanism governing references of schemes already in operation. Its interaction with section 128A supports the conclusion that a notified scheme should proceed through the relevant procedure as a whole. (see para [26])
1 more judgment, and what each says about section 119, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.