(1)In this Part—
“literary work” means any work, other than a dramatic or musical work, which is written, spoken or sung, and accordingly includes—
(a)a table or compilation other than a database , . . .
(b)a computer program; . . . (c) preparatory design material for a computer program and
(d)a database
“dramatic work” includes a work of dance or mime; and
“musical work” means a work consisting of music, exclusive of any words or action intended to be sung, spoken or performed with the music.
(2)Copyright does not subsist in a literary, dramatic or musical work unless and until it is recorded, in writing or otherwise; and references in this Part to the time at which such a work is made are to the time at which it is so recorded.
(3)It is immaterial for the purposes of subsection (2) whether the work is recorded by or with the permission of the author; and where it is not recorded by the author, nothing in that subsection affects the question whether copyright subsists in the record as distinct from the work recorded.
Cases considering section 3 37
[2023] EWCA Civ 868 · 20 July 2023Interprets
If the Bitcoin File Format was a work, it was capable of being a literary work in view of the broad statutory concept of writing (see para [62]).
The provision confirms that a computer program is included within the statutory category of literary works (see para [38]).
Fixation is a condition precedent to copyright subsistence but remains distinct from the work. A structure may satisfy the provision if recorded completely and unambiguously; descriptive content and permanence are unnecessary (see paras [50]; [59]; [68]-[75]).
Read with section 3(2), the provision confirms that the fixation need not be made or authorised by the author. No causal link is required between the subsistence fixation and the later copying (see paras [74]-[75]).
[2011] EWCA Civ 890 · 27 July 2011Defines
Defines the literary-work framework applied to headlines and newspaper articles (see paras [12]; [19]-[22]).
Applies the definition of literary work to written newspaper headlines and articles (see paras [12]; [19]-[22]).
Cited only.
[2006] EWCA Civ 1044 · 25 July 2006Defines
The court noted that s.3 already treated computer programs as literary works and had been amended to include preparatory design material. It regarded the amendment as unlikely to have made a major change to UK law. (see para. [10])
17 more judgments, and what each says about section 3, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.