Equality Act 2010, section 79

Comparators

Part 5 Work

(1)This section applies for the purposes of this Chapter.

(2)If A is employed, B is a comparator if subsection [F81(3), (4), (4A) or (4B)F81] applies.

(3)This subsection applies if—

(a)B is employed by A's employer or by an associate of A's employer, and

(b)A and B work at the same establishment.

(4)This subsection applies if—

(a)B is employed by A's employer or an associate of A's employer,

(b)B works at an establishment other than the one at which A works, and

(c)common terms apply at the establishments (either generally or as between A and B).

[F82 (4A)This subsection applies if a single body—

(a)is responsible for setting or continuing the terms on which A and B are employed, and

(b)is in a position to ensure equal treatment between A and B in respect of such terms.

(4B)This subsection applies if the terms on which A and B are employed are governed by the same collective agreement.F82]

(5)If A holds a personal or public office, B is a comparator if—

(a)B holds a personal or public office, and

(b)the person responsible for paying A is also responsible for paying B.

(6)If A is a relevant member of the House of Commons staff, B is a comparator if—

(a)B is employed by the person who is A's employer under subsection (6) of section 195 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, or

(b)if subsection (7) of that section applies in A's case, B is employed by the person who is A's employer under that subsection.

(7)If A is a relevant member of the House of Lords staff, B is a comparator if B is also a relevant member of the House of Lords staff.

(8)Section 42 does not apply to this Chapter; accordingly, for the purposes of this Chapter only, holding the office of constable is to be treated as holding a personal office.

(9)For the purposes of this section, employers are associated if—

(a)one is a company of which the other (directly or indirectly) has control, or

(b)both are companies of which a third person (directly or indirectly) has control.

[F83 (10) In subsection (4B) “collective agreement” has the same meaning as in the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (see section 178 of that Act ). F83]

Definitions used in section 79 2

Relevant member of the House of Commons staff

(5) “Relevant member of the House of Commons staff” has the meaning given in section 195 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 ; and such a member of staff is an employee of—

(a)the person who is the employer of that member under subsection (6) of that section, or

(b)if subsection (7) of that section applies in the case of that member, the person who is the employer of that member under that subsection.

Defined in s.83(5) · see it in the full Act
Relevant member of the House of Lords staff

(6) “Relevant member of the House of Lords staff” has the meaning given in section 194 of that Act (which provides that such a member of staff is an employee of the Corporate Officer of the House of Lords) .

Defined in s.83(6) · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 79 5

Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and others

[2021] UKSC 10 · 26 March 2021Interprets

The provision governs comparators under the current equal pay legislation. A claimant may compare herself with an employee working at another establishment when the statutory common terms condition is met (see paras [16]-[18]; [59]-[67]). For a comparator at another establishment, the provision imposes a limited threshold requiring common terms at the establishments. The Court inclined, without deciding, to the view that this requirement has the same meaning as under the earlier legislation (see paras [16]-[18]; [59]-[67]). Common terms apply where the comparators would work on the same or substantially the same terms at the claimants’ establishment as at their own. The condition does not require identical terms or a comparison of the two groups’ individual terms (see paras [17]-[19]; [59]-[67]).

Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley & Ors

[2019] EWCA Civ 44 · 31 January 2019Interprets

The court interpreted section 79(2)-(4) as prescribing the permitted comparator relationship. For cross-establishment claims, the operative inquiry is whether common terms apply at the two establishments, generally or for the relevant classes. (see paras. [15]-[16], [63]-[80]) The court treated subsection 79(4) as containing the cross-establishment conditions and analysed paragraph (c) as the substantive common-terms gateway. (see paras. [15], [23], [74]-[80]) The court held that common terms apply where the relevant classes are subject to terms that apply irrespective of establishment, with broad commonality sufficient. The wording “as between A and B” did not require comparison of their actual contracts. (see paras. [66]-[80], [113])

City of London Police v Geldart

[2021] EWCA Civ 611 · 28 April 2021Defines

The court referred to section 79 with section 66 when outlining the statutory sex equality clause. It formed part of the explanatory context for construing section 71. (see para [86])

1 more judgment, and what each says about section 79, are in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Explanatory note

275.This section sets out the circumstances in which employees and others are taken to be comparators for the purposes of Chapter 3. A person who claims the benefit of a sex equality clause or sex equality rule must be able to show that his or her work is equal to that of the chosen comparator. The application of Article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which has direct effect, will ensure that existing case law on the breadth of possible comparisons is carried forward, so that, for example, in relevant circumstances the concept of a comparator will include a predecessor doing the same job.

276.If two persons share the same employer and work at the same establishment, each may be a comparator for the other.

277.If two persons work at different establishments but share the same employer and common terms and conditions of employment apply, each may be a comparator for the other.

278.A person can also be a comparator for another in either of the above circumstances if one is employed by a company associated with the other’s employer. Subsection (9) defines when employers are taken to be associated.

279.A person holding a personal or public office may be a comparator for another person holding a personal or public office if the same person is responsible for paying both of them.

280.A person holding the office of constable is treated for the purposes of Chapter 3 as holding a personal office for the purpose of determining who can be that person’s comparator.

281.The section also defines when staff of the Houses of Parliament may be taken to be each other’s comparators.

282.These provisions generally reflect the effect of provisions in previous legislation.

All the explanatory notes for the Act

Amendments and notes

3 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Amendments

  1. F81Words in s. 79(2) substituted (1.1.2024) by The Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (S.I. 2023/1425), regs. 1(2), 5(2)
  2. F82S. 79(4A)(4B) inserted (1.1.2024) by The Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (S.I. 2023/1425), regs. 1(2), 5(3)
  3. F83S. 79(10) inserted (1.1.2024) by The Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (S.I. 2023/1425), regs. 1(2), 5(4)