Finance Act 2003, section 18

Joint and several liability for unpaid VAT of another trader

Part 2 Value added tax

(1)In Part 4 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (c. 23) (administration, collection and enforcement), after section 77 insert—

“Liability for unpaid VAT of another

77A Joint and several liability of traders in supply chain where tax unpaid

(1)This section applies to goods of any of the following descriptions—

(a)telephones and any other equipment, including parts and accessories, made or adapted for use in connection with telephones or telecommunication;

(b)computers and any other equipment, including parts, accessories and software, made or adapted for use in connection with computers or computer systems.

(2)Where—

(a)a taxable supply of goods to which this section applies has been made to a taxable person, and

(b)at the time of the supply the person knew or had reasonable grounds to suspect that some or all of the VAT payable in respect of that supply, or on any previous or subsequent supply of those goods, would go unpaid,

the Commissioners may serve on him a notice specifying the amount of the VAT so payable that is unpaid, and stating the effect of the notice.

(3)The effect of a notice under this section is that—

(a)the person served with the notice, and

(b)the person liable, apart from this section, for the amount specified in the notice,

are jointly and severally liable to the Commissioners for that amount.

(4)For the purposes of subsection (2) above the amount of VAT that is payable in respect of a supply is the lesser of—

(a)the amount chargeable on the supply, and

(b)the amount shown as due on the supplier’s return for the prescribed accounting period in question (if he has made one) together with any amount assessed as due from him for that period (subject to any appeal by him).

(5)The reference in subsection (4)(b) above to assessing an amount as due from a person includes a reference to the case where, because it is impracticable to do so, the amount is not notified to him.

(6)For the purposes of subsection (2) above, a person shall be presumed to have reasonable grounds for suspecting matters to be as mentioned in paragraph (b) of that subsection if the price payable by him for the goods in question—

(a)was less than the lowest price that might reasonably be expected to be payable for them on the open market, or

(b)was less than the price payable on any previous supply of those goods.

(7)The presumption provided for by subsection (6) above is rebuttable on proof that the low price payable for the goods was due to circumstances unconnected with failure to pay VAT.

(8)Subsection (6) above is without prejudice to any other way of establishing reasonable grounds for suspicion.

(9)The Treasury may by order amend subsection (1) above; and any such order may make such incidental, supplemental, consequential or transitional provision as the Treasury think fit.

(10)For the purposes of this section—

(a)“goods” includes services;

(b)an amount of VAT counts as unpaid only to the extent that it exceeds the amount of any refund due.”.

(2)In section 83 of that Act (appeals) after paragraph (r) insert—

“(ra)any liability arising by virtue of section 77A;”.

(3) In section 84(3) of that Act (appeals not to be entertained unless the VAT has been paid or deposited, except where that would cause hardship) for “or (q)” substitute “, (q) or (ra)” .

(4)This section shall be deemed to have come into force on 10th April 2003 except subsection (3) which applies in relation to any appeal notice of which is given on or after the day on which this Act is passed.

Cases considering section 18 4

Customs and Excise & Anor v Federation of Technological Industries & Ors

[2004] EWCA Civ 1020 · 30 July 2004

Section 18 inserted section 77A into the Value Added Tax Act 1994, creating the joint and several liability provision. Whether the Directive authorised that provision was referred without final determination. (see paras [22]-[31], [74])

Federation of Technological Industries & Ors, R (on the application of) v Customs and Excise & Anor

[2004] EWHC 254 (Admin) · 18 February 2004

Section 18 inserted section 77A, permitting joint and several liability for unpaid VAT in specified telephone and computer transactions. Its Community-law authorisation was referred, while proportionality and Convention objections were rejected. (see paras [1], [4], [28]-[40])

Red 12 Trading Ltd v Revenue & Customs

[2009] EWHC 2563 (Ch) · 20 October 2009

Confirms that section 18 introduced section 77A into the Value Added Tax Act 1994 for specified goods associated with MTIC fraud. The provision was described as the legislative source of the joint-liability regime.

What each judgment says about section 18 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Amendments and notes

1 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Commencement

  1. I1S. 18 wholly in force at Royal Assent; s. 18(1)(2)(4) in force retrospective to 10.4.2003 and s. 18(3) in force at Royal Assent see s. 18(4)