25
An administrator of a company may not be appointed under paragraph 22 if—
(a)
a petition for the winding up of the company has been presented and is not yet disposed of,
(b)
an administration application has been made and is not yet disposed of, or
(c)
an administrative receiver of the company is in office.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 25 6
[2011] EWHC 2860 (Ch) · 2 November 2011Interprets
Interpreted as preventing an out-of-court appointment under paragraph 22 where a winding-up petition has been presented and remains undisposed of. It does not prevent filing a notice of intention to appoint under paragraph 27.
[2011] EWHC 3959 (Ch) · 26 August 2011Interprets
The court interpreted paragraph 25 as excluding a winding-up petition presented in contravention of the interim moratorium. That construction prevented the petition from defeating an otherwise valid appointment under paragraph 22 (see paras [2], [7]-[10]).
[2009] EWHC 3838 (Ch) · 3 July 2009
Applied to prevent the directors from proceeding with the appointment of administrators while the winding-up petition remained issued and undisposed of (see para [16]).
What each judgment says about Schedule B1, paragraph 25 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.