29(1)A person who appoints an administrator of a company under paragraph 22 shall file with the court—
(a)a notice of appointment, and
(b)such other documents as may be prescribed.
(2)The notice of appointment must include a statutory declaration by or on behalf of the person who makes the appointment—
(a)that the person is entitled to make an appointment under paragraph 22,
(b)that the appointment is in accordance with this Schedule, and
(c)that, so far as the person making the statement is able to ascertain, the statements made and information given in the statutory declaration filed with the notice of intention to appoint remain accurate.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 29 23
[2020] EWHC 2649 (Ch) · 8 October 2020
The provision is applied to the prescribed notice of an out-of-court appointment and the directors’ statutory declaration process. (see paras [35]; [40]; [100]-[101])
[2020] EWHC 1133 (Ch) · 7 May 2020Interprets
Paragraph 29 governs filing of the notice of appointment and associated documents and is read with section 362A to determine when an appointment can become effective (see paras [27], [94]-[107]).
Paragraph 29(1) requires filing of the notice of appointment and prescribed documents. It supports the conclusion that regulator consent must be lodged by the time the notice of appointment is filed (see paras [27], [94], [99], [107]).
Paragraph 29(2) identifies the statutory declaration accompanying the notice of appointment. It supports treating regulator consent as a prescribed document required before the appointment can become effective (see paras [27], [99]).
Paragraph 29(3) requires the administrator’s consent and statement concerning the purpose of administration. It is used in analysing when the appointment takes effect and when all required documents must have been filed (see paras [27], [98]-[100]).
[2020] EWHC 317 (Ch) · 5 February 2020
Applies the requirement that a person appointing an administrator under paragraph 22 must file a notice of appointment and prescribed documents. The filing requirement was not satisfied at the time of the out-of-hours electronic transmission (see paras [7]-[9]).
3 more judgments, and what each says about Schedule B1, paragraph 29, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.