64
(1)
A company in administration or an officer of a company in administration may not exercise a management power without the consent of the administrator.
(2)
For the purpose of sub-paragraph (1)—
(a)
“management power” means a power which could be exercised so as to interfere with the exercise of the administrator’s powers,
(b)
it is immaterial whether the power is conferred by an enactment or an instrument, and
(c)
consent may be general or specific.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 64 16
[2023] UKSC 38 · 1 November 2023
The provision prevents a company in administration or its officers from exercising management powers without the administrator’s consent. It therefore distinguishes the administrator from the company’s officers (see paras [26]-[27]).
[2023] EWHC 829 (Ch) · 14 April 2023
The court applied paragraph 64 in confirming that the company remained outside the control of its directors during the administration. Maintaining that disability was one reason for keeping the administration in place, but it also reinforced the administrators’ continuing responsibilities (see para [19]).
[2020] EWHC 1932 (Ch) · 15 July 2020Interprets
Requires company officers to obtain the administrator’s consent before exercising a management power. The directors’ proposed distribution was treated as a management matter for which consent could properly be given. (see paras [16], [23]-[24], [37], [46]-[48])
Prohibits a company in administration or its officer from exercising a management power without the administrator’s consent. The court treated the directors’ proposed action as requiring, and capable of receiving, that consent. (see paras [16], [37], [46])
Defines the management-power restriction for paragraph 64 purposes. The court concluded that the statutory definition was sufficiently broad to encompass the proposed distribution. (see paras [16], [23]-[24], [37])
What each judgment says about Schedule B1, paragraph 64 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.