95
The court may replace an administrator on the application of a person listed in paragraph 91(1) if the court—
(a)
is satisfied that a person who is entitled to replace the administrator under any of paragraphs 92 to 94 is not taking reasonable steps to make a replacement, or
(b)
that for another reason it is right for the court to make the replacement.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 95 3
[2026] EWHC 362 (Ch) · 23 February 2026Limits
The court limits paragraph 95 to the replacement of an office-holder. It presupposes the continued existence of the office and does not displace the automatic termination produced by registration under paragraph 84(4). (see paras [18], [38]-[40])
[2024] EWHC 2740 (Ch) · 4 November 2024Interprets
Confirms that the court may order a replacement administrator where the statutory conditions are met, including where it is right to do so despite the wishes of the qualifying floating charge holder. (see para [53])
[2020] EWHC 3171 (Ch) · 14 October 2020
The court treats paragraph 95 as supporting the power to appoint replacement administrators as remedial relief following a procedural breach (see para [12]).
What each judgment says about Schedule B1, paragraph 95 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.