Insolvency Act 1986, section 15

Power to deal with charged property, etc

Part II Administration Orders

(1)The administrator of a company may dispose of or otherwise exercise his powers in relation to any property of the company which is subject to a security to which this subsection applies as if the property were not subject to the security.

(2)Where, on an application by the administrator, the court is satisifed that the disposal (with or without other assets) of—

(a)any property of the company subject to a security to which this subsection applies, or

(b)any goods in the possession of the company under a hire-purchase agreement,

would be likely to promote the purpose or one or more of the purposes specified in the administration order, the court may by order authorise the administrator to dispose of the property as if it were not subject to the security or to dispose of the goods as if all rights of the owner under the hire-purchase agreement were vested in the company.

(3)Subsection (1) applies to any security which, as created, was a floating charge; and subsection (2) applies to any other security.

(4)Where property is disposed of under subsection (1), the holder of the security has the same priority in respect of any property of the company directly or indirectly representing the property disposed of as he would have had in respect of the property subject to the security.

(5)It shall be a condition of an order under subsection (2) that—

(a)the net proceeds of the disposal, and

(b)where those proceeds are less than such amount as may be determined by the court to be the net amount which would be realised on a sale of the property or goods in the open market by a willing vendor, such sums as may be required to make good the deficiency,

shall be applied towards discharging the sums secured by the security or payable under the hire-purchase agreement.

(6)Where a condition imposed in pursuance of subsection (5) relates to two or more securities, that condition requires the net proceeds of the disposal and, where paragraph (b) of that subsection applies, the sums mentioned in that paragraph to be applied towards discharging the sums secured by those securities in the order of their priorities.

(7)An office copy of an order under subsection (2) shall, within 14 days after the making of the order, be sent by the administrator to the registrar of companies.

(8)If the administrator without reasonable excuse fails to comply with subsection (7), he is liable to a fine and, for continued contravention, to a daily default fine.

(9)References in this section to hire-purchase agreements include conditional sale agreements, chattel leasing agreements and retention of title agreements.

Definitions used in section 15 3

administrator

1 (1) For the purposes of this Act “administrator” of a company means a person appointed under this Schedule to manage the company’s affairs, business and property.

Defined in Sch.B1 para.1(1) · see it in the full Act
the company

2 Section 233B does not apply in relation to a contract for the supply of goods or services to a company (“the company”) where any of paragraphs 3 to 11 applies.

Defined in Sch.4ZZA para.2 · see it in the full Act
agreement

4 For the purposes of sections 72B and 72E and this Schedule “agreement” includes an agreement or undertaking effected by—

(a)contract,

(b)deed, or

(c)any other instrument intended to have effect in accordance with the law of England and Wales, Scotland or another jurisdiction.

Defined in Sch.2A para.4 · see it in the full Act

(2) “Agreement” includes any agreement or undertaking effected by—

(a)contract,

(b)deed, or

(c)any other instrument intended to have effect in accordance with the law of England and Wales, Scotland or another jurisdiction.

Defined in Sch.ZA1 para.19(2) · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 15 3

Munday & Anor v Hilburn & Anor

[2014] EWHC 4496 (Ch) · 17 December 2014

The court considered the provision as part of the reasoning that annulment does not retrospectively remove liability arising from conduct during bankruptcy. It supported the distinction between revesting property and changing the character of past acts. (see paras [60]; [62])

Thorniley & Anor v HM Revenue & Customs & Anor

[2008] EWHC 124 (Ch) · 5 February 2008

The court referred to s 15(4) to explain that an administrator’s sale of fixed-charge assets did not displace secured-creditor priority, but transferred it to the sale proceeds (see para [10]).

1 more judgment, and what each says about section 15, are in the case-law panel in the full Act.