(1)The court may—
(a)as to all matters relating to the winding up of a company, have regard to the wishes of the creditors or contributories (as proved to it by any sufficient evidence), and
(b)if it thinks fit, for the purpose of ascertaining those wishes, direct qualifying decision procedures to be instigated or the deemed consent procedure to be used in accordance with any directions given by the court, and appoint a person to report the result to the court .
(2)In the case of creditors, regard shall be had to the value of each creditor’s debt.
(3)In the case of contributories, regard shall be had to the number of votes conferred on each contributory . . . .
Cases considering section 195 8
[2025] EWHC 3054 (Ch) · 21 November 2025
The court considers section 195 as recognising the relevance of creditors’ wishes in winding-up matters, while holding that majority views are not conclusive and must be assessed in light of independence and other circumstances. (see paras [147]-[151]; [199]-[207])
[2024] EWHC 1601 (Ch) · 25 June 2024Limits
Applies section 195 as not expressly confined to a technical status, while holding that the appellant nevertheless lacked a sufficient connection and legitimate interest in seeking directions for a qualifying decision procedure (see paras [37], [55], [100]).
Confirms that the court may have regard to the wishes of creditors or contributories, but the provision did not give the appellant a right to compel a procedure where he lacked the necessary interest (see paras [37], [53], [100]).
Confirms the court’s power to direct qualifying decision procedures, while holding that the appellant could not use that power to advance a personal contractual objective or interests outside the liquidation (see paras [37], [94], [100]).
Confirms that the votes of contributories are relevant when the court considers their wishes. The appellant’s negligible holding and opposition from the other members meant that the proposed relief could not realistically succeed (see paras [37], [53], [55]-[57]).
[2020] EWHC 974 (Ch) · 24 April 2020Interprets
The court treated the petitioning creditor’s right to a bankruptcy order as a class right requiring discretionary consideration of creditors supporting and opposing the order (see paras [71]-[78]).
What each judgment says about section 195 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.