Insolvency Act 1986, section 224

Inability to pay debts: other cases

Part V Winding Up of Unregistered Companies

(1)An unregistered company is deemed (for purposes of section 221) unable to pay its debts—

(a)if in England and Wales execution or other process issued on a judgment, decree or order obtained in any court in favour of a creditor against the company, or any member of it as such, or any person authorised to be sued as nominal defendant on behalf of the company, is returned unsatisfied;

(b)if in Scotland the induciae of a charge for payment on an extract decree, or an extract registered bond, or an extract registered protest, have expired without payment being made;

(c)if in Northern Ireland a certificate of unenforceability has been granted in respect of any judgment, decree or order obtained as mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d)if it is otherwise proved to the satisfaction of the court that the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due.

(2)An unregistered company is also deemed unable to pay its debts if it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the value of the company’s assets is less than the amount of its liabilities, taking into account its contingent and prospective liabilities.

Definitions used in section 224 2

unregistered company

For the purposes of this Part “unregistered company” includes any association and any company, with the exception of a company registered under the Companies Act 2006 in any part of the United Kingdom.

Defined in s.220 · see it in the full Act
the company

2 Section 233B does not apply in relation to a contract for the supply of goods or services to a company (“the company”) where any of paragraphs 3 to 11 applies.

Defined in Sch.4ZZA para.2 · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 224 4

Town & Country Properties (GB) Ltd & Ors v Black Capital & Ors

[2022] EWHC 2914 (Ch) · 17 November 2022

Confirms that section 224 provides alternative methods of establishing inability to pay debts under article 7, without requiring a statutory demand. (see para [46]) Confirms that inability to pay debts as they fall due is an available ground under the article 7 regime. (see para [46]) Confirms that balance-sheet insolvency is also available under the article 7 regime. (see para [46])

A Company v Andy Thornton Contracts Ltd

[2013] EWHC 4291 (Ch) · 20 November 2013Defines

The judgment adopts the distinction that a creditor whose debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds cannot establish the standing required to present a winding-up petition under the statutory scheme. The point supports the refusal to use winding-up proceedings to adjudicate the disputed debt (see para [9]).

National Westminster Bank Plc v Msaada Group (a firm) & Ors

[2011] EWHC 3423 (Ch) · 21 December 2011

Applies the cash-flow test in section 224 and finds the partnership unable to pay its debts as they fell due. The common ground and evidence satisfied the requirement for an administration order (see paras [64], [69]).

What each judgment says about section 224 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Amendments and notes

2 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Modifications

  1. C720S. 224 applied (with modifications) by S.I. 1994/2759, reg. 3, Sch. 3 para. 91A(6)
  2. C721S. 224 applied (with modifications) (6.6.2013) by The Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (Contractual Scheme) Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/1388), Pt. 3 reg. 1, Sch. 2 paras. 3, 5 Table (with reg. 24)