(1)The court shall not make a bankruptcy order on a petition under section 264(1)(c) (supervisor of, or person bound by, voluntary arrangement proposed and approved) unless it is satisfied—
(a)that the debtor has failed to comply with his obligations under the voluntary arrangement, or
(b)that information which was false or misleading in any material particular or which contained material omissions—
(i)was contained in any statement of affairs or other document supplied by the debtor under Part VIII to any person, or
(ii)was otherwise made available by the debtor to his creditors in connection with a creditors' decision procedure instigated under that Part, or
(c)that the debtor has failed to do all such things as may for the purposes of the voluntary arrangement have been reasonably required of him by the supervisor of the arrangement.
(2)Where a bankruptcy order is made on a petition under section 264(1)(c), any expenses properly incurred as expenses of the administration of the voluntary arrangement in question shall be a first charge on the bankrupt’s estate.
Cases considering section 276 13
[2002] EWCA Civ 404 · 26 March 2002Limits
The subsection gives properly incurred arrangement expenses a first charge where bankruptcy follows a petition under section 264(1)(c). It does not establish that an individual voluntary arrangement trust terminates upon bankruptcy.
[2020] EWHC 1241 (Ch) · 22 May 2020Interprets
Identified as permitting a bankruptcy order where a debtor fails to comply with obligations under a voluntary arrangement (see paras [33], [36]-[38]).
Used to explain the statutory transparency obligation concerning false, misleading or materially incomplete information supplied in connection with a voluntary arrangement (see paras [33], [37]-[38], [94]).
Identified as addressing a debtor’s failure to do things reasonably required by the supervisor of a voluntary arrangement (see para [33]).
[2017] EWHC 111 (Ch) · 27 January 2017
The court confirmed that materially false or misleading information or material omissions may support a bankruptcy order notwithstanding an IVA. (see paras [78]-[80], [87], [93])
2 more judgments, and what each says about section 276, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.