Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Nov 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 393 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
The First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction under section 4 of the Mobile Homes Act 1983 to determine whether a site owner has breached an agreement by enforcing…
|
|
| 12 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1442 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A caravan site licence must operate in harmony with the express planning permission relied on to obtain it. The licensing authority may impose tighter controls…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 18 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
Under paragraph 18(1)(aa) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, a decrease in the amenity of a protected site may relate to a single pitch. It need not affect the…
|
|
| 22 Aug 2024 |
[2024] UKUT 237 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
A tribunal determining whether a caravan-site licence condition is unduly burdensome must not impose conditions which undermine settled planning enforcement…
|
|
| 8 Jan 2024 |
[2024] UKUT 11 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
An occupier’s entitlement to occupy a mobile home as an only or main residence for the purposes of Mobile Homes Act 1983 section 1(1) is not determined solely…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2021 |
[2021] UKUT 309 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
Where a protected-site agreement requires an occupier to pay for electricity but does not fix the price or method of calculation, the agreement contains an…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Apps Legal Limited is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Apps Legal Limited. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.