Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2630 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A stay of execution following adjudication enforcement is exceptional. A party relying on the successful claimant’s financial position must prove probable…
|
|
| 3 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2241 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A restrictive covenant expressed to secure a personal financial share in development value is not annexed to land where it confers no benefit on other land.…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 511 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The residential occupier exception applies where a party occupies, or genuinely intends to occupy, a dwelling as a residence. Intention is assessed at contract…
|
|
| 12 May 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1134 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Costs ordinarily follow the event, but the court may make a different order where the successful party lost a significant issue which caused the unsuccessful…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 942 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A construction contract may be concluded through informal electronic communications where the objective circumstances show agreement on the scope, price and…
|
|
| 10 May 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1243 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An employee may owe fiduciary duties where the circumstances of employment place him in practical control of his employer’s financial affairs and create a…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2244 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A freezing injunction is a protective remedy, not security for a prospective judgment. The applicant must establish a good arguable case, assets within the…
|
|
| 10 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1418 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Where a contract imposes a single mandatory obligation but leaves the contract-breaker discretion over how to perform it, damages are assessed by asking how…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Archor LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Archor LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.