Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Ashton Ross Law acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 346 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When an entry clearance officer proposes to find that an applicant acted dishonestly, it is arguable that procedural fairness requires an opportunity to…
|
5 |
| 12 Aug 2020 |
[2020] EWCA Civ 1072 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Reopening a final determination under CPR rule 52.30 is an exceptional jurisdiction. All three conditions in rule 52.30(1) must be met: reopening must be…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3299 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A challenge to cancellation of immigration leave on the ground of illegal working is determined by conventional public-law principles, including Wednesbury…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3033 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A challenge to cancellation of student leave for breach of a 20-hour work restriction is governed by ordinary judicial review principles. The court does not…
|
|
| 31 Oct 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2730 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An immigration interview must be procedurally fair. Where an applicant offers potentially relevant evidence, fairness may require the decision-maker to explore…
|
|
| 25 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 346 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When an entry clearance officer proposes to find that an applicant acted dishonestly, it is arguable that procedural fairness requires an opportunity to…
|
5 |
| 12 Aug 2020 |
[2020] EWCA Civ 1072 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Reopening a final determination under CPR rule 52.30 is an exceptional jurisdiction. All three conditions in rule 52.30(1) must be met: reopening must be…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Ashton Ross Law is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Ashton Ross Law. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.