Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jan 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 67 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A partnership agreement expressly providing that the partnership will continue while two or more partners are alive may create a partnership for joint lives…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1692 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Article 30 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, artificial arrangements fall outside a support scheme only where they are made to obtain an…
|
|
| 14 Apr 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 956 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority’s adopted practice may generate a legitimate expectation even where it is described as guidance or best practice. The relevant question is…
|
1 |
| 28 Jun 2007 |
[2007] EWCA Civ 620 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The Court of Appeal should set aside a preliminary-reference question only where the lower court took an incorrect view of Community law and the answer is…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 1833 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Member States may define minimum good agricultural and environmental requirements regionally under Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, provided…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2005 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 1461 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under Article 37 of the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road, a successive carrier may recover compensation only where it…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Barker Gotelee solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Barker Gotelee solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.