Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Barnes Harrild & Dyer Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Dec 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 4113 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Legacy Programme created no substantive entitlement to leave and was operational only. Cases were to be decided individually under the law and policy in…
|
12 |
| 8 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2483 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On an appeal against deprivation of citizenship obtained by fraud, the tribunal conducts a full reconsideration rather than judicial review. Once fraud is…
|
10 |
| 2 Feb 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 85 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A derivative right of residence arising from a child’s EU citizenship is not absolute. A primary carer may be expelled only following an individual and…
|
4 |
| 16 Dec 2020 |
[2020] UKSC 53 · Supreme Court
A third-country national whose residence is derived from a dependent Union citizen under article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2191 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Public interest immunity requires a case-specific balancing exercise. The court, rather than the minister, is the ultimate decision-maker. It must assess the…
|
|
| 20 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1922 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In managing judicial review proceedings, the court must balance expedition and efficient case management against each party’s opportunity to present its case…
|
|
| 16 Dec 2020 |
[2020] UKSC 53 · Supreme Court
A third-country national whose residence is derived from a dependent Union citizen under article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may…
|
3 |
| 8 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2483 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On an appeal against deprivation of citizenship obtained by fraud, the tribunal conducts a full reconsideration rather than judicial review. Once fraud is…
|
10 |
| 2 Feb 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 85 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A derivative right of residence arising from a child’s EU citizenship is not absolute. A primary carer may be expelled only following an individual and…
|
4 |
| 24 May 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1209 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A decision to vary leave to remain has no legal effect until valid written notice is given to the person affected. While an application remains undecided, a…
|
2 |
| 7 Aug 2015 |
[2015] UKUT 430 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
Country guidance remains authoritative where a later appeal depends on the same or similar evidence. It does not relieve a decision-maker of the duty to assess…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2386 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Current discriminatory consequences of historic nationality legislation may engage article 14 read with article 8, even where the original treatment occurred…
|
1 |
| 11 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 956 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Immigration decisions should ordinarily be determined under the law and policy in force when they are made. Inclusion in an operational legacy programme does…
|
2 |
| 10 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2109 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Legacy Programme was an operational process for reviewing unresolved immigration cases. It created no substantive rights, amnesty or distinct policy. A…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 4113 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Legacy Programme created no substantive entitlement to leave and was operational only. Cases were to be decided individually under the law and policy in…
|
12 |
| 13 Sep 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 2794 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A person who voluntarily leaves the United Kingdom cannot derive a legitimate expectation from selectively read policies that an earlier asylum claim will…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Barnes Harrild & Dyer Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Barnes Harrild & Dyer Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.