Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 24 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1442 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A stay of execution pending appeal is discretionary. The court must consider all the circumstances and ask which outcome is less likely to cause injustice.…
|
|
| 16 Mar 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 378 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Nationality for registration purposes is a de jure question. It is determined by the foreign state’s law, established through expert evidence, rather than by…
|
|
| 7 Nov 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 2958 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application for a mandatory interim injunction, the governing test is the same as for a prohibitory injunction. The court must consider whether there is…
|
|
| 12 May 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1099 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A visitor who deliberately gives a misleading account of the intended length or purpose of stay may have obtained entry by deception, even where the visitor…
|
|
| 23 Sep 2015 |
[2015] UKUT 542 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
The test for apparent bias asks whether a fair-minded and properly informed observer, having considered all material circumstances, would conclude that there…
|
2 |
| 16 Nov 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 2966 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For an immigration application, the date of submission is the date on which a valid application is made. Where required photographs were enclosed with the…
|
|
| 29 Oct 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 3136 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Detention under section 36(1) of the UK Borders Act 2007 cannot run in parallel with imprisonment under a custodial sentence. The power arises only when the…
|
|
| 26 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1779 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under the seven-year child residence concession, the decision-maker must begin with a presumption that indefinite leave will normally be granted only in…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Bhogal Partners is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Bhogal Partners. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.