Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Nov 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 1694 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether an impairment has a substantial and long-term adverse effect is ordinarily a fact-sensitive assessment for the Employment Tribunal. A continuing…
|
17 |
| 8 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 941 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In determining whether adverse treatment was imposed because of a protected disclosure, a tribunal must identify the real reason operating in the relevant…
|
14 |
| 19 Oct 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2321 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employee may claim under section 47B(1A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against an individual co-worker who participated in a whistleblowing dismissal.…
|
10 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jun 2025 |
[2025] EAT 77 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Where an employment tribunal has statutory cause-of-action jurisdiction and the requisite territorial connection with Great Britain, the applicable employment…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1608 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
An anti-suit injunction may protect an employee’s statutory entitlement under Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 section 15 C to be sued only in the…
|
1 |
| 8 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 941 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In determining whether adverse treatment was imposed because of a protected disclosure, a tribunal must identify the real reason operating in the relevant…
|
14 |
| 16 Nov 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 1694 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether an impairment has a substantial and long-term adverse effect is ordinarily a fact-sensitive assessment for the Employment Tribunal. A continuing…
|
17 |
| 19 Oct 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2321 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employee may claim under section 47B(1A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against an individual co-worker who participated in a whistleblowing dismissal.…
|
10 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.