Law firm

Brains Solicitors

Brains Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 5 UK judgments from 2006 to 2020, most often in commercial disputes and family and children.

5
judgments
0
in the last five years
2
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes1
  • Family and children1
  • Insolvency and restructuring1
  • Company and partnership1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)2
  • High Court3

Counsel most often instructed

  • Hugh Sims4

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20201
  • 20192
  • 20180
  • 20170
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20140
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20100
  • 20090
  • 20080
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Brains Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
5 Feb 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 37 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In contractual remoteness, the ordinary rule remains that loss is recoverable where, at the time of contracting, a reasonable person would have regarded that…
4
30 Jan 2020
[2020] EWHC 104 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The “best evidence” rule is not a rule requiring production of an original document whenever it is available. It is guidance governing whether secondary…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
30 Jan 2020
[2020] EWHC 104 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The “best evidence” rule is not a rule requiring production of an original document whenever it is available. It is guidance governing whether secondary…
4
29 Oct 2019
[2019] EWHC 2896 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A judgment alleged to have been obtained by fraud cannot ordinarily be challenged within an appeal from that judgment. The allegation involves factual issues…
30 Jul 2019
[2019] EWHC 2086 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An appellate court should not interfere with factual findings unless the decision was one that no reasonable judge could have reached. Respect is required for…
1
5 Feb 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 37 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In contractual remoteness, the ordinary rule remains that loss is recoverable where, at the time of contracting, a reasonable person would have regarded that…
4

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Brains Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Brains Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.