Law firm

Brindley Twist Tafft & James

Brindley Twist Tafft & James is named as solicitors in at least 12 UK judgments from 2005 to 2023, most often in insolvency and restructuring and commercial disputes.

12
judgments
2
in the last five years
3
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Insolvency and restructuring3
  • Commercial disputes3
  • Clinical negligence2
  • Personal injury2
  • Company and partnership1
  • Construction and engineering1
  • Planning and environment1
  • Public and administrative law1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)3
  • High Court9

Counsel most often instructed

  • Stephen Whitaker4

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20232
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20190
  • 20180
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20142
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20101
  • 20090
  • 20082
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Brindley Twist Tafft & James acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
10 Aug 2010
[2010] EWHC 2106 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator may inquire into his own jurisdiction, but his conclusion is not binding unless the parties expressly or impliedly agree that it will be. An…
7
2 Feb 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 39 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For the purposes of section 1(1)(a) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984, an occupier’s duty to a trespasser arises only where injury results from a danger due…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
4 Aug 2023
[2023] EWHC 2038 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Trade mark infringement through internet advertising must distinguish between invisible keyword use and visible use in advert text. Bidding on a competitor’s…
31 Oct 2017
[2017] EWHC 2655 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A representation is construed by asking what a reasonable recipient would understand from the words in their context, including any necessary implication. A…
23 Jul 2014
[2014] EWHC 2787 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where a qualifying floating charge holder appoints an administrator after a winding-up petition has been presented, the petition is suspended rather than…
1
26 Mar 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 1177 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In an estate claim for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, damages are assessed by the ordinary causation comparison between the actual course and the course…
23 May 2013
[2013] EWHC 1387 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An equity arising from a promise, reliance and detriment may constitute property for bankruptcy purposes even though its ultimate value or enforcement depends…
1
10 Aug 2010
[2010] EWHC 2106 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator may inquire into his own jurisdiction, but his conclusion is not binding unless the parties expressly or impliedly agree that it will be. An…
7
15 Dec 2008
[2008] EWHC 3252 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Green Belt boundaries are intended to be permanent. Under PPG2, an established boundary may be changed only where exceptional circumstances make the change…
1
7 Nov 2008
[2008] EWHC 2713 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An insolvency administration order is not automatically annulled because the original petitioner lacked standing. The court has a discretion under the…
6 Jul 2007
[2007] EWHC 1621 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Contractual meaning is determined objectively from the agreement read as a whole, its commercial context and the relevant background known to the parties.…
2
2 Feb 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 39 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For the purposes of section 1(1)(a) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984, an occupier’s duty to a trespasser arises only where injury results from a danger due…
4
8 Mar 2005
[2005] EWCA Civ 223 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An appellate court may intervene where a trial judge’s assessment of expert evidence was materially influenced by scientific literature that was not produced…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Brindley Twist Tafft & James is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Brindley Twist Tafft & James. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.