Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Cahill Gordon & Reindel (UK) LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2759 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Claims under section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 are postponed only until the claimant discovers, or could with reasonable diligence discover, enough facts…
|
10 |
| 17 Feb 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 140 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a novel negligence case, a duty of care must be developed incrementally and by analogy with established authority. Foreseeability, proximity and whether a…
|
5 |
| 10 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 1484 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Litigation privilege protects communications made for the sole or dominant purpose of conducting adversarial litigation, including secondary evidence which…
|
3 |
| 28 Feb 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 548 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Disclosure of documents held by a third party requires evidence of either a legally enforceable right of access or a standing or continuing practical…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2759 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Claims under section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 are postponed only until the claimant discovers, or could with reasonable diligence discover, enough facts…
|
10 |
| 28 Feb 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 548 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Disclosure of documents held by a third party requires evidence of either a legally enforceable right of access or a standing or continuing practical…
|
3 |
| 17 Feb 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 140 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a novel negligence case, a duty of care must be developed incrementally and by analogy with established authority. Foreseeability, proximity and whether a…
|
5 |
| 10 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 1484 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Litigation privilege protects communications made for the sole or dominant purpose of conducting adversarial litigation, including secondary evidence which…
|
3 |
| 13 May 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1136 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
The identity of a person communicating with a lawyer attracts legal professional privilege only where the communication itself is privileged and disclosure of…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 135 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An employer does not generally owe an employee a duty to protect against pure economic loss. A focused duty may arise in a novel case through incremental…
|
1 |
| 3 Dec 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 2684 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For summary judgment purposes, a claim relying on section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 fails where the claimant has no realistic prospect of proving that…
|
2 |
| 15 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1318 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Permission to serve a witness summary under CPR 32.9 requires proof that the party was unable to obtain a witness statement. The requirement should be applied…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3213 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Permission to amend a statement of case should be granted only where the proposed case has a real, rather than fanciful, prospect of success and is adequately…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 682 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Under CPR rule 44.2(8), where costs are subject to detailed assessment, the court will ordinarily order a reasonable payment on account unless there is good…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Cahill Gordon & Reindel (UK) LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Cahill Gordon & Reindel (UK) LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.