Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Feb 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 404 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
When awarding an interim payment on account of costs, the court must assess recoverable costs objectively. The relevant measure is the lowest sum reasonably…
|
32 |
| 6 Apr 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 466 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On a summary assessment, costs claimed at hourly rates substantially above the applicable guideline rates require a clear and compelling justification. It is…
|
26 |
| 23 Apr 2013 |
[2013] EWCA Civ 416 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Commercial contracts are construed objectively from their wording, read in context and against the relevant factual background. The text remains the starting…
|
20 |
| 18 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 714 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A claim governed by foreign law may be time-barred at the interlocutory stage where the disclosed evidence establishes that the claimant knew, or should have…
|
13 |
| 11 Oct 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 3073 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For jurisdiction purposes, a claimant need only establish the applicable jurisdictional basis to the required good arguable standard; the court need not…
|
12 |
| 13 Sep 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1190 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Implementation of an anti-competitive agreement made by others can itself amount to a concerted practice contrary to Article 101 where the undertaking acts…
|
10 |
| 5 Oct 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Under the ISDA Master Agreement, the contractual Default Rate is confined to the price of actual or hypothetical borrowing of the relevant amount for the…
|
9 |
| 1 Apr 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 423 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On an application for permission to serve a contribution claim outside the jurisdiction, the claimant must establish that England and Wales is clearly the…
|
9 |
| 18 Nov 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Keyword bidding is use of the searched trade mark, distinct from the consequences of the resulting advertisement. Infringement depends on whether the…
|
9 |
| 28 Feb 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 369 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A trial judge should not reopen issues already determined merely because a party later obtains new evidence or develops a new argument. Reconsideration is…
|
7 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2107 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A stay pending an intended appeal is discretionary and fact-sensitive. The court must weigh the risk of injustice in granting or refusing it, the effect of…
|
|
| 1 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 409 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a follow-on cartel damages claim, uncertainty does not justify a claimant-favouring or defendant-favouring bias. The court must use sound imagination and a…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3232 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where contractual terms govern the appointment and removal of a trustee, the court must construe the provisions together, giving effect to their language…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 213 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For an in-time application under CPR r. 7.6(2), the court exercises its discretion in accordance with the overriding objective. A claimant’s delay in preparing…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2717 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A contractual jurisdiction clause must be construed as a whole, giving effect to its natural and ordinary meaning and commercial purpose. An express submission…
|
3 |
| 25 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1909 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Where an appeal has been argued on the basis of particular applications and a later order superseding earlier orders, the consequential order normally follows…
|
|
| 14 May 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1138 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
On a challenge to discretionary case-management decisions, the appellate court must respect the first-instance judge’s broad evaluative margin. It may…
|
2 |
| 23 Feb 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 590 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
The jurisdictional threshold for security for costs under Civil Procedure Rules 1998, rule 25.13(2)(a), does not by itself justify an order. The court must…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 13 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In a follow-on competition damages claim, the claimant must prove loss caused by the infringement, but damages need not be quantified with mathematical…
|
2 |
| 5 Feb 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 208 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
When deciding whether to make or structure a Group Litigation Order, the court must exercise a flexible case-management discretion directed to proportionality…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 110 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A party’s actual or potential limitation defence is a material factor when the court decides whether there is a serious issue to be tried on an application for…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3309 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Summary judgment may be granted on declaratory issues where the defendant has no realistic prospect of showing that the underlying facts or matters are wrong…
|
5 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.