Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Clyde & Co acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 26 May 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The General Medical Council may appeal under section 40A of the Medical Act 1983 against a tribunal's decision to give no direction, including where it has…
|
95 |
| 17 Jan 2019 |
[2019] EWCA Civ 10 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The good arguable case test for establishing jurisdiction is a single, flexible inquiry. The claimant must ordinarily show that it has the better argument on…
|
94 |
| 31 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKSC 58 · Supreme Court
An appellate court may reverse a trial judge’s findings of fact only where the judge was plainly wrong. It must respect the trial judge’s advantages in seeing…
|
83 |
| 2 Feb 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 163 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where a voyage charter treats waiting for charterers’ orders as laytime or demurrage, and its payment clause covers all charterers’ purposes so counted, any…
|
78 |
| 4 Mar 2015 |
[2015] UKSC 10 · Supreme Court
Accessory liability as a joint tortfeasor requires more than knowing facilitation. The defendant must provide assistance which is more than trivial and must do…
|
78 |
| 13 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 257 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A published Air Accident Investigation Branch report is admissible in civil proceedings for its factual evidence, including hearsay, and its opinions informed…
|
69 |
| 15 Jan 2021 |
[2021] UKSC 1 · Supreme Court
Business interruption cover must be construed objectively and as a coherent whole. A radius-limited disease clause covers cases of disease occurring within the…
|
63 |
| 9 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKSC 10 · Supreme Court
The Fairchild exception applies to mesothelioma caused by a single wrongful exposure to asbestos where environmental exposure is the only alternative source.…
|
47 |
| 29 Oct 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 2614 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court has jurisdiction under Insolvency Act 1986 to wind up an unregistered foreign company in the statutory circumstances. Its exercise is discretionary…
|
44 |
| 27 Mar 2017 |
[2017] EWCA Civ 195 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under Civil Procedure Rules 1998 r 36.14(3), enhanced interest after a claimant has bettered its Part 36 offer is not confined to compensation for litigation…
|
41 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2319 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Subject to jurisdiction and natural justice, the court takes a robust approach to enforcing an adjudicator’s decision. A decision remains binding if the…
|
|
| 9 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2324 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application to sanction a Part VII insurance business transfer under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the court must identify the nature and…
|
|
| 11 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2138 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a challenge under Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s. 288, the court reviews an inspector’s regulation 63 decision on ordinary public-law principles and…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1754 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For Unfair Contracts Act 1977 section 27(1), a choice of English law does not prevent disapplication where, absent that choice, Rome I would select foreign…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1714 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In a floating hire formula, a clause requiring TTF to be deducted from JKM produces a negative figure when TTF is higher. The signed result must be used in the…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1733 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 14 of Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023, the Secretary of State must address whether replacing assimilated law increases the…
|
|
| 7 Jul 2026 |
[2026] UKUT 258 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
Whether construction of a distinct part of a building qualifies for zero-rating under item 2, Group 5, Schedule 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 requires…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where a policy excludes damage directly or indirectly occasioned by, happening through, or in consequence of war, the causal link need not be proximate. War…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1429 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A statement of case must identify the facts, duties, breaches, causation and loss relied on against each defendant. General allegations of statutory…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1392 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
An arbitration agreement’s governing law is determined separately from the law governing the wider contract. Where the parties expressly select English law for…
|
|
| 5 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1365 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An appeal on a question of fact is a review, not a rehearing. The appellate court must not interfere merely because it might have reached a different…
|
|
| 26 May 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1260 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, contribution requires the parties to be liable for the same damage. A company is not jointly vicariously…
|
Earlier names
These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Clyde & Co: Berrymans Lace Mawer, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, BLM, Halliwells, Simpson & Marwick, Berrymans, Beaumont and Son, HBM Sayers.
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Clyde & Co is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Clyde & Co. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.