Law firm

Croft Solicitors

Croft Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 21 UK judgments from 2016 to 2026, most often in civil fraud and asset recovery and public and administrative law.

21
judgments
13
in the last five years
1
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Civil fraud and asset recovery4
  • Public and administrative law2
  • Trusts, wills and private client2
  • Real estate1
  • Planning and environment1
  • Professional liability1
  • Insolvency and restructuring1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)1
  • High Court19
  • Upper Tribunal1

Counsel most often instructed

  • PATRICK GREEN4
  • Rachel Tandy4
  • Henry Warwick3
  • Jonathan Adkin3

Judgments by year

  • 20262
  • 20252
  • 20243
  • 20232
  • 20224
  • 20210
  • 20203
  • 20192
  • 20182
  • 20170
  • 20161

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Croft Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
3 Nov 2016
[2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Crown cannot use prerogative powers to give notice under Article 50 where that notice will alter domestic law or remove statutory rights. The European…
4
10 Feb 2023
[2023] EWHC 265 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Claims in deceit, breach of agency duties, dishonest assistance and unlawful-means conspiracy require proof of the particular representation, breach…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
10 Feb 2026
[2026] UKUT 51 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
On an application under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925, planning permission is a persuasive indicator that the proposed use is reasonable, but it…
1
15 Jul 2025
[2025] EWHC 1811 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Summary judgment is appropriate where a claim has no realistic, rather than fanciful, prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason for a trial.…
23 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 125 (SCCO) · High Court: Senior Courts Costs Office
Points of Dispute in a detailed assessment must identify the challenged items and state concisely the nature and grounds of each objection. The receiving party…
2
8 Aug 2024
[2024] EWHC 3566 (SCCO) · High Court: Senior Courts Costs Office
On a detailed assessment of costs, guideline hourly rates are guidance and a possible starting point, not a default entitlement. The appropriate starting point…
10 Feb 2023
[2023] EWHC 265 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Claims in deceit, breach of agency duties, dishonest assistance and unlawful-means conspiracy require proof of the particular representation, breach…
3
23 Dec 2022
[2022] EWHC 3374 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Indemnity costs require conduct sufficiently outside the ordinary and reasonable conduct of proceedings. A party’s failure to prove several issues, refusal to…
21 Nov 2022
[2022] EWHC 2947 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A fiduciary who has clear notice that trust property, or a fund in his possession, is claimed by another must not deal with it in disregard of that claim.…
27 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 1964 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An order for security for costs requires satisfaction of a threshold condition and a separate assessment of whether the order is just in all the circumstances.…
4 Mar 2020
[2020] EWHC 645 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to amend grounds of appeal should be granted where the proposed ground has a real prospect of success. An application to admit fresh evidence is…
26 Feb 2020
[2020] EWHC 440 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For limitation purposes, a proposed new claim may be added after expiry of the limitation period where it arises from the same or substantially the same facts…
2
4 Mar 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 304 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A court should not treat an advisory referendum as a binding election or import statutory consequences which Parliament has not provided. Where Parliament has…
23 Oct 2018
[2018] EWHC 2877 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For an amendment to add a new cause of action after limitation has expired, the claimant must show that it arises from the same or substantially the same facts…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Croft Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Croft Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.