Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Crowell & Moring acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sep 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1190 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Implementation of an anti-competitive agreement made by others can itself amount to a concerted practice contrary to Article 101 where the undertaking acts…
|
10 |
| 19 Oct 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 2665 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A claim for damages for breach of competition law may proceed against a subsidiary alleged to form part of the same economic undertaking as an infringing…
|
5 |
| 26 May 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1413 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Expert evidence is permitted by the court and is subject to strict duties of independence, objectivity, transparency and equality of arms. Experts and…
|
4 |
| 28 Nov 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1559 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Follow-on damages claims under the Competition Act 1998 must be founded on a Commission infringement decision binding on the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Where…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 282 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A provisional liquidator’s powers depend on the appointment order and the facts. Protecting company assets may, in an unusual and urgent case, require selling…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2927 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
An anti-suit injunction will ordinarily be granted where the applicant establishes, to a high degree of probability, a binding jurisdiction agreement covering…
|
1 |
| 12 Aug 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2128 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In an English defamation claim, the public interest defence under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 is assessed primarily by reference to English law and…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3678 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Disclosure in English proceedings is governed by the lex fori. A foreign blocking statute does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to order disclosure…
|
1 |
| 26 May 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1248 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Applications for a preliminary issue trial or interim injunction should be assessed by their practical utility, including whether they will resolve or…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1247 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
On an application for a mandatory interlocutory injunction, the applicable approach is the conventional American Cyanamid analysis. There is no distinct…
|
|
| 26 May 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1413 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Expert evidence is permitted by the court and is subject to strict duties of independence, objectivity, transparency and equality of arms. Experts and…
|
4 |
| 23 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1027 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Permission to amend pleadings shortly before trial should be refused where the proposed case has no real prospect of success. Even if it is arguable, the…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2685 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In an application by office-holders for directions concerning remuneration, expenses and common costs, the court declined to grant declarations without a…
|
|
| 28 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3514 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Applications for strike-out or summary judgment should not determine difficult, fact-sensitive issues prematurely where the relevant evidence is substantially…
|
1 |
| 28 Nov 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1559 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Follow-on damages claims under the Competition Act 1998 must be founded on a Commission infringement decision binding on the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Where…
|
3 |
| 13 Sep 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1190 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Implementation of an anti-competitive agreement made by others can itself amount to a concerted practice contrary to Article 101 where the undertaking acts…
|
10 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Crowell & Moring is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Crowell & Moring. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.