Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases DJM Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jul 2005 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 855 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Contractual security provisions for leveraged trading must be construed from the language of the agreement as a whole. Credit, deposits and margin payments may…
|
10 |
| 3 May 2019 |
[2019] EWCA Civ 754 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Part 36 offer may settle an existing claim together with a proposed counterclaim which has not yet been pleaded. A counterclaim is treated as a separate…
|
5 |
| 13 Jul 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 1687 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Summary judgment may be granted where the defendant has no realistic prospect of successfully defending the claim and no compelling reason for trial remains.…
|
3 |
| 23 Jul 2015 |
[2015] EWCA Civ 782 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Proprietary estoppel requires a holistic assessment of assurance or encouragement, reliance and detriment, and whether it would be unconscionable to permit…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 484 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A written statement in a skeleton argument may constitute an admission under CPR rule 14.1 where it accepts the truth of the opponent’s claimed entitlement…
|
1 |
| 8 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1368 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Summary judgment is inappropriate where the construction of a remediability clause depends on disputed facts and the contractual context. “Capable of remedy”…
|
|
| 13 Nov 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3028 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An interim payment application under a construction subcontract must be clear in substance, form and intent. It must identify the sum claimed, the basis of…
|
|
| 7 Oct 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2588 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For permitted development height restrictions, the relevant ground level is generally the level that would exist when the proposed development is completed in…
|
|
| 3 May 2019 |
[2019] EWCA Civ 754 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Part 36 offer may settle an existing claim together with a proposed counterclaim which has not yet been pleaded. A counterclaim is treated as a separate…
|
5 |
| 17 Apr 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 989 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A contractual notice deeming defects to have been made good may conclusively end the contractual defects-liability machinery without conclusively determining…
|
|
| 15 Aug 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2192 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A collateral warranty may operate retrospectively where its wording and factual matrix show that the parties intended the beneficiary to have rights…
|
2 |
| 19 Apr 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 869 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A contractual obligation to act in good faith may be breached by covert and opportunistic conduct, even where the contract contains no exclusivity or…
|
|
| 11 May 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1066 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A party to an adjudication cannot ordinarily approbate and reprobate the adjudicator’s decision. Where, without an express reservation of rights, it invites…
|
1 |
| 10 May 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1087 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The tort of misfeasance in public office requires an exercise of public power, unlawfulness, the requisite bad faith or mental state, and actual loss caused by…
|
1 |
| 11 Feb 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 236 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A non-exclusive English jurisdiction clause creates a strong prima facie case for retaining English jurisdiction. The party seeking to avoid that contractual…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2015 |
[2015] EWCA Civ 782 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Proprietary estoppel requires a holistic assessment of assurance or encouragement, reliance and detriment, and whether it would be unconscionable to permit…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which DJM Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with DJM Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.