Law firm

Dorsey & Whitney

Dorsey & Whitney is named as solicitors in at least 43 UK judgments from 2003 to 2024, most often in tax and public and administrative law.

43
judgments
4
in the last five years
6
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
10
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Tax21
  • Public and administrative law7
  • Crime6
  • Intellectual property5
  • Commercial disputes5
  • Trusts, wills and private client2
  • Cross-border disputes1
  • Company and partnership1

Courts

  • Privy Council6
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)10
  • High Court27

Counsel most often instructed

  • David Cavender15
  • Graham Aaronson14
  • Paul Farmer5

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20241
  • 20233
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20192
  • 20180
  • 20172
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20141
  • 20132
  • 20122
  • 20115
  • 20106
  • 20094
  • 20085
  • 20074

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Dorsey & Whitney acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
31 Jan 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 25 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A non-discrimination article in a double taxation convention was infringed where a United Kingdom subsidiary of a foreign parent could not make a group income…
28
31 Jan 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 57 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under rule 25.7(1)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, an applicant for an interim payment must satisfy the court, on the balance of probabilities, that it…
14
23 Feb 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 103 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Restitution under the Woolwich principle extends to tax unlawfully exacted through compulsory self-assessment. A formal demand is unnecessary. Community law…
12
27 Nov 2008
[2008] EWHC 2893 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A member state may use different systems to relieve economic double taxation of domestic and foreign dividends, but foreign dividends must not receive less…
7
7 Nov 2011
[2011] EWHC 2895 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In a contingent earn-out agreement, an obligation to seek regulatory approval diligently requires reasonable application, industry and perseverance. It does…
6
24 Nov 2003
[2003] EWHC 2813 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A double taxation agreement does not automatically become wholly part of domestic law when implemented under Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, section…
5
6 Sep 2019
[2019] EWHC 2371 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Permission to amend a defence or introduce a counterclaim should be granted where the proposed case has a real, rather than fanciful, prospect of success. The…
4
30 Jan 2007
[2007] EWHC 103 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For VAT purposes, a transaction must be analysed by reference to its economic reality and the objective features of what a typical customer receives. Supplies…
4
5 Nov 2008
[2008] EWHC 2679 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In a forum non conveniens application, the court must first determine whether the proposed foreign forum is available and suitable for the interests of all…
3
21 Jul 2009
[2009] EWHC 1817 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An employee may owe fiduciary duties in limited respects arising from the context of particular contractual responsibilities. Such duties do not automatically…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
20 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3325 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual right to terminate on reasonable notice is not inferred where the agreement, read as a whole, provides for indefinite duration and expressly…
6 Dec 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 1451 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For limitation by statutory acquiescence, the five-year period begins when the proprietor of the earlier trade mark knows of the use of the later mark and that…
2
27 Feb 2023
[2023] EWHC 411 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Statutory acquiescence under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 requires five years’ acquiescence in use of a registered trade mark. Time begins only when…
6 Sep 2019
[2019] EWHC 2371 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Permission to amend a defence or introduce a counterclaim should be granted where the proposed case has a real, rather than fanciful, prospect of success. The…
4
11 Apr 2019
[2019] EWHC 849 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For an opposition under section 5(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, the opponent must establish reputation, a link between the marks, and a relevant injury or…
11 Feb 2013
[2013] EWHC 205 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A national court should exercise restraint before making a preliminary reference where the questions may prove academic or the factual context is incomplete.…
31 Jan 2013
[2013] EWHC 108 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A non-test claimant in group litigation may seek an interim payment where the conditions in CPR rule 25.7(1)(c) are satisfied. The existence of a group…
31 Jan 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 57 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under rule 25.7(1)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, an applicant for an interim payment must satisfy the court, on the balance of probabilities, that it…
14
7 Nov 2011
[2011] EWHC 2895 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In a contingent earn-out agreement, an obligation to seek regulatory approval diligently requires reasonable application, industry and perseverance. It does…
6
14 Oct 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 1156 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Cross-border group relief for losses of a non-resident subsidiary is available where the paragraph 55 conditions are satisfied. Following the earlier Court of…
1
18 Feb 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 127 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
By a majority, the Court held that cross-border thin-capitalisation legislation does not unlawfully restrict Article 43 of the EC Treaty merely because it…
21 Dec 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 1480 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Article 49 required equal access to a group income election where its denial disadvantaged a UK subsidiary paying dividends to an EU-resident parent. The…

Earlier names

These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Dorsey & Whitney: Dorsey.

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Dorsey & Whitney is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Dorsey & Whitney. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.