Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases EJ Winter & Son LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1236 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An independent higher-education complaints reviewer is not required to adjudicate disputed legal rights or make a formal finding of disability discrimination.…
|
17 |
| 23 May 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The exclusion of complaints concerning academic judgment from the jurisdiction of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator applies only to the extent that the…
|
4 |
| 13 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2520 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judicial review is a remedy of last resort where a suitable alternative remedy exists. The Office of the Independent Adjudicator scheme is such a remedy for…
|
4 |
| 6 Feb 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 207 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The statutory exclusion for academic judgement does not protect every decision made by an academic institution. It applies only to the extent that the…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2003 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A complaint outcome issued by the Office of the Independent Adjudicator is a discrete decision on the merits, distinct from later recommendations. A claimant…
|
|
| 13 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2520 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judicial review is a remedy of last resort where a suitable alternative remedy exists. The Office of the Independent Adjudicator scheme is such a remedy for…
|
4 |
| 30 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1971 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The question whether proceedings relate to the subject matter of a qualifying complaint under the Higher Education Act 2004 is an objective question of…
|
1 |
| 17 Jan 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 13 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In reviewing a university fitness-to-practise decision, the court must respect the specialist judgment of the panel and must not substitute its own view merely…
|
1 |
| 13 Nov 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3285 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review of a student-complaints review body requires a cautious approach. The court asks whether the decision was one which no reasonable…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 207 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The statutory exclusion for academic judgement does not protect every decision made by an academic institution. It applies only to the extent that the…
|
3 |
| 5 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 558 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review of an OIA decision is concerned with legality and rationality, not a rehearing of the underlying academic or factual dispute. The OIA has a…
|
|
| 23 May 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The exclusion of complaints concerning academic judgment from the jurisdiction of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator applies only to the extent that the…
|
4 |
| 6 Feb 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 172 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An error of fact in an adjudication will justify judicial review only if it is material to the outcome. Where the complaint would inevitably have been…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1614 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An ombudsman scheme funded by participating institutions is not thereby insufficiently independent. The question is whether a fair-minded and informed observer…
|
1 |
| 27 Oct 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1236 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An independent higher-education complaints reviewer is not required to adjudicate disputed legal rights or make a formal finding of disability discrimination.…
|
17 |
| 23 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1889 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Office of the Independent Adjudicator may consider disability discrimination law when deciding whether a higher education institution acted fairly and…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which EJ Winter & Son LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with EJ Winter & Son LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.