Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Sep 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 2366 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An equitable set-off prevents enforcement of connected cross-claims to the relevant extent, but neither its existence nor its exercise extinguishes or reduces…
|
17 |
| 9 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1708 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In assessing damages for trade mark infringement, passing off and related contractual breaches, the claimant bears the burden of proving loss, but damages are…
|
5 |
| 9 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 302 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The safeguarding regime for electronic money does not create a statutory trust over funds received by an electronic money institution. It protects electronic…
|
5 |
| 14 Feb 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 224 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An employer’s commercial reorganisation following an acquisition does not, without more, amount to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of mutual trust and…
|
3 |
| 11 Jul 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 1678 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On a summary judgment application, the court must determine whether a party has a real prospect of success without conducting a documentary trial. Where…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1466 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A failure to have a declaration of solvency made before a suitably qualified person is a fundamental non-compliance with the statutory requirements for a…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 302 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The safeguarding regime for electronic money does not create a statutory trust over funds received by an electronic money institution. It protects electronic…
|
5 |
| 14 Feb 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 224 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An employer’s commercial reorganisation following an acquisition does not, without more, amount to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of mutual trust and…
|
3 |
| 23 Sep 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 2366 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An equitable set-off prevents enforcement of connected cross-claims to the relevant extent, but neither its existence nor its exercise extinguishes or reduces…
|
17 |
| 9 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1708 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In assessing damages for trade mark infringement, passing off and related contractual breaches, the claimant bears the burden of proving loss, but damages are…
|
5 |
| 19 Feb 2008 |
[2008] EWCA Civ 99 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On an appeal against primary findings of fact, the Court of Appeal must give proper weight to the trial judge’s advantage in seeing witnesses and hearing the…
|
|
| 4 May 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 1039 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
In assessing costs, the court must identify the successful party by substance and reality. Costs generally follow the event, but the court retains a discretion…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 752 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Contractual exclusion clauses require clear words before removing common-law rights or remedies. A warranty preserving rights provided by law may coexist with…
|
1 |
| 11 Jul 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 1678 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On a summary judgment application, the court must determine whether a party has a real prospect of success without conducting a documentary trial. Where…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.