Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Fenwick Elliott LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Feb 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 282 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator must determine the essential disputed claim, rather than confining the reference to the parties’ pre-referral arguments or evidence. A…
|
62 |
| 23 Apr 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 837 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator must address the dispute referred, including any legitimate defence necessarily encompassed by a monetary claim. A deliberate and materially…
|
27 |
| 16 Mar 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 517 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s decision within jurisdiction and reached in broad accordance with natural justice must ordinarily be enforced, despite errors of fact or law.…
|
24 |
| 13 Apr 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 720 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Contractual adjudication provisions which materially fetter a party’s statutory right to refer a dispute at any time, including by imposing liability for the…
|
16 |
| 29 Jun 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 1855 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication decisions are generally enforced without reopening issues decided by the adjudicator. An exception arises where the issue is short, self-contained…
|
13 |
| 16 Jun 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1487 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Contractual notice provisions governing adjudication must be construed according to their wording. Where a clause requires delivery personally to a specified…
|
10 |
| 16 Dec 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 3104 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
The unsuccessful party will ordinarily pay the successful party’s costs. An issue-based costs order is appropriate only where the successful party’s failure on…
|
9 |
| 16 Mar 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 557 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Under a construction contract incorporating a statutory interim-payment regime, a contractor’s application must be an unambiguous statement of the sum…
|
7 |
| 8 Apr 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1058 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudication decision is enforceable despite an alleged error of fact or law, provided its terms are sufficiently certain. A party may reserve its…
|
7 |
| 4 Jul 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 1584 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
The court has an inherent, discretionary jurisdiction to stay proceedings brought in breach of a binding agreement to adjudicate. Where such an agreement…
|
6 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1404 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
In adjudication enforcement proceedings, a court may refuse enforcement where the adjudicator decides a material issue on a factual or legal basis that neither…
|
1 |
| 25 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 771 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Where both parties have addressed the court on interest, the court may depart from an adjudicator’s approach and determine the correct contractual basis…
|
|
| 16 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 612 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
In adjudication-enforcement proceedings, the court may consider related Part 8 proceedings only where the issue is short and self-contained, requires no…
|
|
| 30 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 152 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Summary enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision is inappropriate where there is a real prospect that the contract relied upon to found the adjudicator’s…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3209 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A freezing order may be continued where the claimant shows a good arguable case, a real risk that enforcement will be frustrated by unjustified dissipation of…
|
|
| 29 Aug 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2213 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A judge is not bound by expert evidence, including evidence from a single joint expert. The judge must consider relevant expert evidence and explain any…
|
|
| 28 Aug 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2896 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A contractual period expressed in months expires on the corresponding calendar date, unless the contract provides otherwise. A provision excluding public…
|
|
| 2 May 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1032 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s statutory power to correct a clerical or typographical error is narrow. It permits correction of an accidental error in the expression or…
|
|
| 12 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1142 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A contractor that has settled an employer’s claim may pursue a contribution from a subcontractor without proving its own actual liability, provided it would…
|
|
| 14 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2881 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s decision under a contractual adjudication regime remains binding and enforceable unless and until revised in the agreed final…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1842 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Contractual provisions are not void for uncertainty merely because they contain drafting infelicities, inconsistent dates or duplicated alternatives. The court…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2537 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A contractual reference to assigning a subcontract ordinarily transfers the assignor’s accrued and future rights, unless clear words limit the assignment. It…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Fenwick Elliott LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Fenwick Elliott LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.